Skip to content

The RISMUS Cohort Study: Risk Among Music Students.

A Longitudinal Investigation of the Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Playing-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Music Students

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622190
Acronym
RISMUS
Enrollment
500
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-10-31
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2018-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Limb Injury

Keywords

playing-related musculoskeletal disorder (PRMD), music students, pain, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorder

Brief summary

This observational cohort study involves repeated cross-sectional observations in order to identify those factors associated with increased risk of PRMDs among music students. All pre-college and university-level students from several European music academies will receive an invitation to complete a web-based questionnaire survey at each of three occasions (baseline; 6-months follow-up; 12-months follow-up).

Detailed description

Professional musicians are exposed to chronic high volume of continuous and repeated physical movements, sometimes in challenging and ergonomically unfavourable anatomical body positions, in order to acquire and improve technical playing skills. As a consequence, musicians are vulnerable to developing adverse playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs) that may affect the manner in which and the extent to which music can be practised and performed. In order to find out effective solutions for PRMDs and to develop future preventive measures, it is fundamental to firstly identify the main risk factors that play a significant role in the development of adverse musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and symptoms. The longitudinal cohort study will be conducted through the following three phases: 1. a baseline cross-sectional survey (i.e. web-based questionnaire) to characterise the study population and subgroups, and form the basis for the evaluation of associated factors and relationships with the development of PRMDs; 2. a 6-months follow-up survey, and 3. a 12-months follow-up survey. After the first baseline data collection (Phase 1), the cohort of students will be broken down into: * Cohort 1: music students (both pre-college and university-level) who are free of pain and PRMDs at baseline data collection * Cohort 2: music students (both pre-college and university-level) who aren't free of pain and PRMDs at baseline data collection Afterwards, the two cohorts will be followed and invited for reassessment at 6 months (Phase 2) and 12 months (Phase 3). Both the follow-ups will permit longitudinal change in outcome scores to be generated and compared (longitudinal comparisons) for strength and progression of association, alongside those from absolute outcome scores at several cross-sectional analyses. The web-based survey will include questions about any pain, PRMD and/or MSK problem they may have due to their musical practice, and different outcome measures (i.e. lifestyle and physical activity, practice habits, behaviour toward prevention and health history, level of stress, perfectionism, fatigue and disability). The outcome measures have been selected according to the relevant findings of previous cross-sectional studies and systematic reviews among the performing arts literature. Each outcome measure correspond to a suspected factor that may be associated with the development of a PRMD. To the best of our knowledge, no other longitudinal studies on risk factors for PRMDs have been conducted so far. Therefore, the study can be considered as an opportunity to fill the gaps of current research on PRMDs and generate new knowledge in educational and employment musical contexts.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Queen Margaret University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All pre-college and university-level students from music academies, with a classical instrument as main subject.

Exclusion criteria

* Music students without a classical instrument as main subject (composers and conductors) * Positive history for neurological, rheumatic, psychological disorders or emotional distress, as well as surgery of the upper limbs and/or the spine in the last 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-rated health (SRH)12 monthsThe SHR is a simple measure which is usually assessed as a single-item: In general, would you say your health is, with the response items excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor to assess health status.
Severity of pain or MSK disorderone monthRespondents are asked to assign a number, from zero (no pain) to ten (the worst possible pain), to the severity of their pain.
Location of painone monthRespondents are asked to indicate where they have pain and/or MSK disorders by clicking on the part(s) in which they have or have had their pain and/or MSK problem during the last month.
Pain Disability Indexone monthA short, self-report instrument for measuring the degree of interference with normal role functioning caused by pain. The respondent uses an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 10 (total disability) to rate the degree to which pain interferes with functioning in the following seven areas: family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activity. The total score can range from 0 to 70.to participate in essential life activities.
A 2-item short form of the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)one monthRespondents are asked to rate how confidently they can perform work and normal life activities, despite their pain. They answer by circling a number on a 7-point Likert scale under each item, where 0 = not at all confident and 6= completely confident in the last month.
Quick Dash - Performing Arts Sectionone weekThis questions relate to the impact of your pain on playing students' practice. Respondents rate each item based on their experience over the preceding week on a 5-point Likert-type scale, increasing from 1 to 5 in level of difficulty/severity.
Presence of pain or musculoskeletal (MSK) disorderup to 12 monthsThe presence of pain and/or MSK problems will be assessed through the following question: When did you last experience a bout of significant pain and/or musculoskeletal problem?
Presence of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs)one monthSelf reported PRMDs according to the definition: any pain and/or musculoskeletal problem interfered with students' ability to play their musical instrument at the level to which they are accustomed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Internation Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF)one weekIPAQ-SF investigates the physical activity of four intensity levels (i.e. vigorous-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, walking, and sitting) in the past week.
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)four weeksA brief measure of non-specific psychological distress in the anxiety-depression spectrum. The K10 comprises ten questions about psychological distress designed to measure anxiety and depression. Each question is related to a specific emotional state and each has a five-level response scale. It is designed to quantify the frequency and severity of anxiety- and depression-related symptoms experienced in the past four weeks.
Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale - short form (HFMPS-SF)12 monthsThe HFMPS-SF is a 15-item questionnaire to measure trait perfectionism. Respondents rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, increasing in level of agreement (from 1 disagree to 7 agree). Items are structured according to three subscales: self-oriented (SOP), other-oriented (OOP), and socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP), where higher scores on each scale, indicating higher levels of perfectionistic attitudes and behaviours.
The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11)one monthThe CFQ-11 is a reliable measure (Cronbach α = 0.90) to assess the severity of tiredness among population (Chalder et al. 1993). Each of the eleven items are answered on a 4-point Likert-type, from 1 (asymptomatic) increasing to 4 as responses become more symptomatic. The respondent's global score can range from 0 to 33, where higher scores indicate greater tiredness. The global score also includes two dimensions-physical fatigue (measured by items 1-7) and psychological fatigue (measured by items 8-11).
Standardised Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ)12 monthsA general questionnaire on 12-months prevalence of troubles in nine symptom sites being neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, low back, wrist/hands, hips/thighs, knees and ankles/feet.

Contacts

Primary ContactCinzia Cruder, MA
Ccruder@qmu.ac.uk0041766938039

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026