Skip to content

Evaluating Barriers to Stroke Screening and Prevention in Children With Sickle Cell Disease

DISPLACE: Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (Part 1 and 2)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03621826
Acronym
DISPLACE
Enrollment
5247
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-02-12
Completion date
2019-06-28
Last updated
2019-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease, Stroke Ischemic

Keywords

sickle cell anemia, TCD, screening, dissemination, implementation

Brief summary

DISPLACE is a three part, multi-center U.S. based study to evaluate the barriers to stroke screening and prevention in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). In the United States, TCD (Transcranial Doppler ultrasound) is a proven method of screening children with SCA for stroke. However, many children are not getting the screening they need. This study will examine the issues that hinder and help children get the screening at 28 different hospitals and sickle cell centers to improve care for all children with sickle cell anemia. The investigators will then plan a study (part 3) aimed to improve stroke screening and prevention in sickle cell anemia.

Detailed description

DISPLACE (Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention: Looking At the Care Environment) is a multi-center, national NHLBI-funded grant to evaluate the real world implementation of the STOP protocol in which transcranial Doppler (TCD), a measure of cerebral blood vessel velocity, is used to screen for stroke risk in children ages 2-16 with sickle cell anemia (SCA). Based on the STOP (Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia) protocol, children identified as high risk of stroke by TCD are initiated on chronic red cell transfusion therapy (CRCT) for stroke prevention. Children with normal TCD are screened annually from the age of 2 until they are 16 years of age. This will be a THREE-part study beginning with Part 1 - a retrospective case record review followed by Part 2 - a multi-level qualitative assessment of barriers and enablers to TCD screening and initiation of chronic red blood cell transfusions and later adding Part 3 - a multi-center implementation clinical trial.The investigators will compare two implementation interventions to improve TCD screening. There are three aims of the grant and each aim is equivalent to the respective parts of the grant (i.e. Part 1 covers 1 aim). There are a total 28 consortium sites. The Medical University of South Carolina is the lead institution for this study.

Interventions

A convenience sample of patients/parents and stakeholders will be asked to participate in a survey and/or interview to evaluate barriers to care in sickle cell.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age is \>2 and \<16 at time of review (from 2012-2016) * have documented sickle cell anemia * primary language is English * patient at a DISPLACE consortium institution Caregiver Characteristics: Parent or guardian of patient who meets above criteria Primary language is English Has the cognitive capacity to complete questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Child Characteristics: Experiencing current acute complications of sickle cell disease requiring hospitalization or an acute care visit (e.g., pain crises, acute chest syndrome, acute cerebrovascular events/stroke or active infection/fever) Caregiver Characteristics: Has a child experiencing current acute complication of sickle cell disease, such as pain crisis, acute chest syndrome, stroke, or infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual TCD screening rates (retrospective data assessment)2 yearsCurrent rate of TCD screening over the last 5 years
Identify the barriers and enablers to TCD screening2 yearsThis study will assess two different implementation strategies to improve TCD screening. To determine which strategy is more effective, a difference in TCD screening rates of at least 17% between intervention arms is necessary. If there is not at least a 17% difference in annual TCD screening rates, it will be impossible to determine the optimal implementation procedures
Retrospective assessment of initiation of chronic transfusion therapy in patients over the last 5 years in those children at risk of stroke2 yearsPatients with abnormal TCD should be started on chronic transfusion therapy. The goal of the intervention is to increase institutional initiation of CRCT in at least 95% of patients noted to have abnormal TCD

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate patient and stakeholder reported barriers to CRCT2 yearsThe investigators will asses barriers to CRCT

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026