Urethral Catheter; Complications
Conditions
Keywords
Painless indwelling urethral catheter, uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Lobectomy, Lung cancer
Brief summary
This study is a prospective cohort study.The main study content is the feasibility and advantages of painless indwelling catheter in perioperative period of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lobectomy of lung cancer,divided into exposed and non-exposed groups.The exposed group was painless indwelled urethral catheter, the non-exposed group was indwelled urethral catheter routinely.
Detailed description
This study is a prospective cohort study.The main study content is the feasibility and advantages of painless indwelling catheter in perioperative period of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in radical resection of lung cancer,divided into exposed and non-exposed groups,divided into exposed and non-exposed groups.Communicating with the surgeon and patients who meet the inclusion criteria, decide whether to enter the exposed or non-exposed group.The exposed group was painless indwelled urethral catheter, the non-exposed group was indwelled urethral catheter routinely.By collecting personal information of two groups of patients and the corresponding observation indicators to analyze whether the painless indwelling urethral catheters in lobectomy of lung cancer is more beneficial than the indwelled urethral catheter routinely in lobectomy of lung cancer, and it is safe and feasible.
Interventions
PROCEDUREpainless indwelling catheter
Catheterization after anesthesia (14 F Foley's urinary catheter), the patient was removed before the anesthesia was awakened and the catheter was removed(Fully lubricate the anterior end of the catheter with a lidocaine ointment 2.5g before catheterization).
PROCEDUREindwelling catheter
The patients underwent catheterization(14 F Foley's catheter) after anesthesia,and the catheter was indwelled(Fully lubricate the anterior end of the catheter with a lidocaine ointment 2.5g before catheterization). The patient was routinely removed for 24 to 72 hours after surgery.
Sponsors
Xueying Yang
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
This study is a prospective cohort study.Participants,Care Provider, and Investigator all know the grouping situation. The Investigator collect the information and observation indicators of the two groups of participants and send to the Outcomes Assessor . The Outcomes Assessor does not know the grouping situation of each participant.
Intervention model description
This study is a prospective cohort study.The main study content is the feasibility and advantages of painless indwelling catheter in perioperative period of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lobectomy of lung cancer,divided into exposed and non-exposed groups.The exposed group was painless indwelled urethral catheter, the non-exposed group was indwelled urethral catheter routinely.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1.18 to 75-year old patient with lung cancer who is eligible for Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in lobectomy. 2.The result of rapid pathology is primary lung cancer. 3.Electrocardiogram, pulmonary function, color Doppler echocardiography, arteriovenous color Doppler ultrasound and other preoperative examination results are normal. 4.The patient agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients have severe urinary system diseases (medium-to-severe BPH, urethral stricture, urinary calculi, infections, tumors, etc.) ,and/or have undergone abdominal and pelvic surgery before surgery. 2. There is a potential infection before surgery. 3. Heart and lung serious organic diseases. 4. Combined thoracic adhesions, patients with severe coagulation insufficiency. 5. The time of anesthesia is more than 4 hours. \-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Urine retention rate | 10 days | Urine retention rate |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary tract infection | 10 days | The two groups of patients were each examined for middle urine after extubation. Refer to the clinical diagnostic criteria of the 2006 Hospital Infection Diagnostic Criteria (Trial): If the urinary leukocyte male ≥ 5 / high power field, female ≥ 10 / high power field, accompanied or not accompanied by urinary frequency, urgency, dysuria, etc. Symptoms of urinary tract irritation; or pain in the lower abdomen, pain in the kidney area, with or without fever. |
| Postoperative bedtime | 2 days | The time from the patient's postoperative pushback to the first bedtime |
| Postoperative hospital stay | 15 days | Postoperative hospital stay |
| The total cost of hospitalization | 15 days | The total cost of hospitalization |
| Postoperative pain level | 3 days | Using visual analogue scale/score (VAS), the degree of discomfort (pain and urinary sensation) is represented by 11 numbers from 0 to 10, with 0 being painless and no urine, and 10 being the most painful. (or) The sense of urinary sensation is strong, so that the patient can choose the number according to the feeling of self, indicating the degree. 0 degree: 0 points, no discomfort; I degree (mild): 1 to 3 points, with slight pain and/or urinary sensation, can tolerate; II degree (moderate): 4 to 7 points, patient pain And/or urinary sensation and affect sleep, can tolerate; III degree (severe): 8 to 10 points, the patient has progressively strong pain and/or urinary sensation, pain is unbearable, affecting appetite, affecting sleep. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactXueying Yang, M.D.
Backup ContactLei Zhang, M.M.
Outcome results
None listed