Septic Shock
Conditions
Keywords
passive leg raising, fluid responsiveness, pulse contour analysis, transthoracic ultrasound, velocity time integral
Brief summary
The objective of the present study is to investigate accuracy of changes in cardiac output following passive leg raising as estimated by transthoracic ultrasound as method to predict fluid responsiveness and compare that to changes in cardiac output following PLR as estimated by calibrated pulse contour analysis as method to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
Detailed description
One method to predict fluid responsiveness is to increase preload by transferring blood from the lower extremities to the central compartment through a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver and then measure the resulting change in cardiac output. It was recently suggested that an increase in cardiac output following PLR had a high accuracy compared other methods to test fluid responsiveness. Different methods to estimate change in cardiac output have been used in studies investigating accuracy of PLR. Most commonly calibrated pulse contour analysis has been used in mechanically ventilated patients whereas transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)has been used in spontaneously breathing patients. While TTE offers the advantage of being less invasive than calibrated pulse contour analysis it is technically challenging and user dependent and the accuracy of the two methods has not been compared.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Region Skane
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Septic shock according to the sepsis-3 criteria 2. The treating physician plans to administer fluid to improve organ perfusion and oxygenation due to signs of inadequate organ perfusion and hypoxia (skin mottling, tachycardia (\>100), urine output below 0.5 ml/kg/h, lactate persistently \> 2 mmol/l and central venous oxygen saturation \< 70%, increasing doses of vasoconstrictors to maintain mean arterial pressure \>65 mmHg. 3. Hemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution initiated as part of routine clinical monitoring.
Exclusion criteria
1. Any condition that will affect the reliability of the PLR procedure or is a contraindication to PLR (compression stockings or intraabdominal pressure \> 12 mm Hg, raised intracranial pressure). 2. PaO2/FiO2 \< 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa) or suspicion of cardiogenic edema 3. Transthoracic echo does not allow recording of VTI. 4. Age \>18 years. 5. No informed consent 6. Prior inclusion in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for prediction of fluid responsiveness. | Cardiac output will be measured immediately prior to passive leg raising and 1 minute after completion of passive leg raising | Prediction of fluid responsiveness by evaluation change in cardiac output using either transthoracic ultrasound or calibrated pulse contour analysis after a passive leg raising. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive and negative likelihood ratios | Cardiac output will be measured immediately prior to passive leg raising and 1 minute after completion of passive leg raising | Prediction of fluid responsiveness by evaluation change in cardiac output using either transthoracic ultrasound or calibrated pulse contour analysis after a passive leg raising. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Usefulness | During screening or during examination | Number of eligible patients in which respective method could not be used |
Countries
Sweden
Outcome results
None listed