Skip to content

Precision Approach to PPI Therapy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Precision Approach to PPI Therapy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03619811
Enrollment
43
Registered
2018-08-08
Start date
2018-07-13
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Keywords

esophageal disorders

Brief summary

This study plans to learn more about reflux associated laryngeal symptoms, and more efficient ways to diagnose and treat this condition.

Detailed description

Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms, coined laryngopharyngeal reflux, occurs when gastro-esophago-pharyngeal reflux contributes to chronic laryngeal symptoms such as throat clearing, sore throat and dysphonia. Over the past 25 years, Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms has been increasingly, and often incorrectly, diagnosed and has emerged as a point of controversy and confusion.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTReflux Band® Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Assist Device

UES augmentation via the UES assist device is effective in true Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms. In our first pilot trial with the UES assist device, patients had significant symptom reduction following 2 weeks of UES assist device use. Based on our preliminary work, we theorize that the UES assist device is effective in Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms.

Sponsors

University of California, San Diego
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-89 years male and female, * \>8 weeks of symptoms of sore throat, throat clearing, and/or voice hoarseness, * naïve to PPI or able to stop for 8 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Laryngeal mass lesion on laryngoscopy; * Pregnant; * Unable to consent in English; * Imprisoned; * PPI intolerance; * Contraindication to UESAD use per manufacturer guidelines which include: * Patients with implants or implant parts that reside in the area where UESAD is applied. * Patients with an implanted pacemaker, implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), vagus nerve stimulator, or other such similar devices implanted in the neck. * Patients diagnosed with glaucoma. * Patients who had a malignancy of the neck, including neck surgery. * Patients that may have an altered mental status including due to the use of sedative drugs or narcotics. * Patients with carotid artery disease, thyroid disease, a history of cerebrovascular disease, or any disorder of connective tissues (e.g., Marfan's Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome). * Patients who use nocturnal NIV machines such as CPAP or BiPAP.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported Symptom Response to Treatment Measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) ScoreWeek 8 (Completion)Response will be assessed binary as positive or negative where a positive response is defined by a post-treatment reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and a 33% change from comparator RSI. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 45. The lower the score means less reported symptoms and the higher the score means more reported symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Symptomatic
This study examines the efficacy of the upper esophageal sphincter assist device as an adjunct to Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy in symptomatic subjects. (Reflux Band® Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Assist Device) Reflux Band® Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Assist Device: UES augmentation via the UES assist device is effective in true Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms. In our first pilot trial with the UES assist device, patients had significant symptom reduction following 2 weeks of UES assist device use. Based on our preliminary work, we theorize that the UES assist device is effective in Reflux associated laryngeal symptoms.
43
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSymptomatic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
33 Participants
Age, Continuous50.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White / Caucasian
26 Participants
Reflux Symptom Index Baseline24.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Patient-reported Symptom Response to Treatment Measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score

Response will be assessed binary as positive or negative where a positive response is defined by a post-treatment reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and a 33% change from comparator RSI. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 45. The lower the score means less reported symptoms and the higher the score means more reported symptoms.

Time frame: Week 8 (Completion)

Population: This analysis includes the participants that completed phase 1 \& 2 of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SymptomaticPatient-reported Symptom Response to Treatment Measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score15.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Primary

Patient-reported Symptom Response to Treatment Measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score

Response will be assessed binary as positive or negative where a positive response is defined by a post-treatment reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and a 33% change from comparator RSI. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 45. The lower the score means less reported symptoms and the higher the score means more reported symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: This population completed phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SymptomaticPatient-reported Symptom Response to Treatment Measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score21.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026