Skip to content

Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft In Root Coverage of Gingival Recessions With Previously Restored Cervical Lesions

Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft In Root Coverage of Gingival Recessions With Previously Restored Cervical Lesions. A Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03615092
Enrollment
17
Registered
2018-08-03
Start date
2011-01-30
Completion date
2018-07-13
Last updated
2018-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

Acellular dermal matrix graft, Clinical Trial, Root coverage, Noncarious cervical lesion

Brief summary

Patients with high standards of oral hygiene frequently search for buccal gingival recession (GR) treatment due to cervical wear, root sensitivity and compromising aesthetics. The cervical lesion (NCCL) is commonly produced by improper toothbrushing techniques, sharing the same etiology of GR. Many different surgical approaches have been described. The association of a graft to the coronally advanced flap had demonstrated the best long-term outcome for root coverage. But, substitutes for the autogenous graft must be studied. Therefore, the aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the effectiveness of the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) in root coverage associated with a previous restored cervical lesion or not. Material and methods: Seventeen individuals with bilateral GR were included in the study. At one side, the GR must present a previously restored cervical lesion, as the test group (TG). The contralateral arch, must present GR with an intact root surface (CG). All patients were treated with the extended flap technique associated with the ADMG. All clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 6-months postoperative.

Interventions

PROCEDURERoot coverage with extended flap technique and acelular dermal matrix

At one side, the root coverage have been done with a extended flap technique and acellular dermal matrix and there was no cervical lesion. At the other side, the same technique was performed, but the gingival recession was associated with a noncarious cervical lesion.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The clinical parameters were screened by one single examiner that was not aware of the procedures

Intervention model description

Controlled Split-mouth clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* CEJ without significant damage; * localized bilateral RT112 gingival recession ≥3 mm in the same arch, in which one had a non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) restored with composite and the opposite one was intact

Exclusion criteria

* previous periodontal surgical treatment on the involved sites; * smokers * pregnants or lactating * compromised systemic health and contraindications for periodontal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Root coverage6 monthsRoot coverage is measured by the difference between the gingival recession height at 6 months and baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Keratinized tissue6monthsThe difference between keratinized tissue width and depth at 6 months and at baseline.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026