Skip to content

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03613545
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-08-03
Start date
2018-08-10
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2021-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Brief summary

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a strategy that infuses a fecal suspension containing a healthy donor's microbiota into a patient's gut to restore his/her intestinal microbiome. FMT has a higher cure rate than standard antibiotic treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infections,and shows promising results in Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD).However, few studies have evaluated whether FMT is effective to treat Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS).The investigators propose to determine the efficiency and safety of FMT in patients with Irritable bowel syndrome.

Detailed description

The present clinical trial aims to re-establish a gut functionality state of intestinal flora through FMT as a therapy for Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS). We established a standard microbiota isolation from donated fresh stool in lab. Then the microbiota is transplanted to the whole colon through a tube. Patients from Guangzhou First People's Hospital in this study will be assigned to receive FMT at least two times according to associated guidelines and follow-up for at least six months. Questionnaires will be used to assess participants at study start and at study completion.

Interventions

PROCEDUREfecal microbiota transplantation

200 mL of prepared fecal microbiota suspension from heathy donors' fresh feces was injected into the colon

PROCEDUREInfusion of sham

Infusion of sham

DRUGprobiotics, antibiotics or antidepressants

Drugs such as probiotics, antibiotics, antidepressants

Sponsors

Guangzhou First People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Masking only Participant

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be considered eligible for enrolment into the study, subjects must: * Be able to give written informed consent. * Males and females aged \>18 and \<75 * Have IBS as defined by the Rome IV criteria

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the below criteria: * pregnant or having a follow-up of less than 6 months; * unable to give informed consent; * suffering from other severe disease ,including liver and kidney failure, cancers, intestinal diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, C difficile infection; * unable to undergo endoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome assessed by Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)baseline; one month;three months;six monthsThis questionnaire was used for assessing IBS severity. Scores of five questions were calculated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale: the severity of abdominal pain, the frequency of abdominal pain, the severity of abdominal distention, dissatisfaction with bowel habits and interference with quality of life. The scores ranged from 0 to 500, a higher score indicating worse condition :\<75 indicated remission; 75-175 indicated mild IBS;176-300 indicated moderate IBS; and \> 300 indicated severe IBS .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome assessed by Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) Questionnaire Scoresbaseline; one month;three months;six monthsThe IBS-QOL questionnaire consisted of 34 items, covering eight aspects (dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance,social reaction, sexual dysfunction, and relationships). Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale(1 = not at all, 5 = a great deal). Total scores were transformed to a 0±100 scale ranging from 0 (maximum quality of life) to 100 (poor quality of life).
Change in Depression and Anxiety assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale(HAMA)baseline; one month;three months;six monthsThe Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) were used to evaluate the mental and psychological states of patients. HAMD scores were graded as follows: 8-19, mild depression; 20-34, moderate depression; ≥35, severely depression. HAMA scores were graded as follows: 14-20, mild anxiety; 21-28, moderate anxiety;≥29 , severe anxiety.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHongli Huang, MM
honglisums@126.com86-13631316718
Backup ContactHuiting Chen, MM
gracy1977@tom.com86-13926055294

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026