Skip to content

The Effectiveness of the Push-Pull-Hold Program on Improving Self-Care in Patients With Heart Failure

The Effectiveness of the Push-Pull-Hold Program on Improving Self-Care in Patients With Heart Failure: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03612765
Acronym
PPHP
Enrollment
144
Registered
2018-08-02
Start date
2018-09-12
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

heart failure, self-care, behavio*, intervention, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial that tests the effectiveness of a novel intervention called the Push-Pull-Hold program on improving self-care in patients with heart failure. This intervention was developed based on our previous quantitative and qualitative findings and existing psychological concepts. Results would inform current understanding of the intention-behavior link in self-care and inform future policy and intervention development to improve patient and caregiver outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPush-Pull-Hold Program

Developed based on concepts of motivational interviewing, temporal framing, empowerment. It is tailored to Singaporean patients and includes contextual self-care information and tips.

Sponsors

National Heart Centre Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically diagnosed with chronic heart failure for at least 1 month * More than 21 years old * Able to read and understand English or Chinese

Exclusion criteria

* Dependent on caregivers * Awaiting implantable devices or surgery * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) maintenance subscaleweeks 1, 12 and 24SCHFI maintenance subscale is a 10-item, self-administered instrument that measures self-care maintenance behaviours such as medication adherence. Each item of the instrument is rated on a 4-point Likert scale and each subscale score is rescaled to range from 0 to 100 where a score of more than or equal to 70 represents adequate self-care.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in intention to change behavioursweeks 1, 12 and 24Intention will be measured using a self-developed 3-item, self-administered instrument. Responses will be measured on a 7-point Likert scale where a higher score indicates a higher intention to change behaviours.
Changes in the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI)weeks 1, 12 and 24SRHI is a 12-items, self-administered instrument that measures automaticity; behaviour frequency; and self-identity on a 7-point Likert scale. Scores will be averaged and a higher score indicates higher habit strength.
Changes in Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)weeks 1, 12 and 24MAAS is a 15-items, self-administered instrument measured on a 6-point Likert scale. A mean score will be computed and a higher score indicates higher level of mindfulness.
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)weeks 1, 12 and 24MLHFQ is a 21-items, self-administered instrument measured on a 6-point Likert scale and includes components of physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life. Scores will be summed up and ahigher score indicates poorer quality of life.
Changes in the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFCS)weeks 1, 12 and 24CFCS is a 14-items self-administered instrument that measures the degree to which one considers about and is influenced by the potential consequences of their present behaviours. Each item is measured using a 7-point Likert scale where 1 represents extremely uncharacteristic and 7 represents extremely characteristic of the participant. The average scores of the items will be calculated, where a higher score indicates a higher consideration of future consequences.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityWeek 24Incidence of mortality.
Changes in emergency department visitsWeeks 1 and 24Measures the changes in the incidence of emergency department visits.
Changes in readmissionWeeks 1 and 24Measures the changes in readmission incidences.

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026