Skip to content

Effect of Functional Foods on Gut Microbiota in Metabolic Syndrome

Effect of a Dietary Portfolio (PD) (Nopal, Chia, Soy, Oat and Inulin) and Physical Activity on Gut Microbiota in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03611140
Acronym
MetS
Enrollment
72
Registered
2018-08-02
Start date
2014-01-10
Completion date
2018-07-15
Last updated
2018-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

metabolic syndrome, gut microbiota, metabolic endotoxemia, functional foods

Brief summary

Aim: To study the effect of a combination of functional foods on gut microbiota in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Subjects that met the metabolic syndrome criteria were enrolled in a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-control study. The subjects were randomized to receive a dietary portfolio (DP) or placebo (P) treatment for 2 mo. The primary endpoint was to study the effect of a DP on gut microbiota. Secondary endpoints were biochemical and anthropometric parameters, LPS, insulin, leptin, area under the curve for glucose and insulin.

Detailed description

This study was a single-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel versus placebo that consisted of five visits. The first visit was a screening evaluation to determine whether subjects met the inclusion criteria. The selected subjects were invited to a second visit that consisted of a medical history, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the collection of stool samples for DNA isolation and collection of 5 ml blood sample. The participants received during the first stage, a low saturated fat diet (LSFD) for 15 days. In the third visit and second stage of dietary treatment, subjects were randomized to receive the dietary portfolio (DP) or placebo (P) treatment + an LSFD accompanied of a reduced energy diet for 1 mo. In the fourth visit, with a 1 mo interval, dietary assessment and compliance to the DP or P were evaluated. During each follow-up visit, a 24-h dietary recall was collected, a physical activity questionnaire was filled out and anthropometric and clinical parameters were assessed. In the fifth visit, a 2 -h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed, and a stool sample for DNA isolation and 5 ml blood were collected. Dietary intervention in the first stage, the participants consumed a reduced-energy diet tailored to provide a 500-kcal/d deficit as recommended by NIH with respect to their habitual diet for 15 days. The diet plan consisted in 50-60% carbohydrates, 15% protein, 25-35% fat, \<7% saturated fat, ≤ 200 mg, 20-35 g fiber, 2000 mg/d sodium based on total energy. In the second stage, the participants continued to consume the reduced energy diet with the addition of a combination of functional foods (DP). The DP provided 200 kcal that were subtracted from the diet. The DP consisted of a mixture of 14 g de dehydrated nopal, 4 g of chia, 25 g of soy protein, 14 g of oat, 4 g of inulin, 0.15 of flavoring. The placebo (P) consisted of 30 g of calcium caseinate, 30 g of maltodextrin and 0.2 g of flavoring. The kcal, appearance, and flavor were similar in DP and P. The DP and P were given in a package in the dehydrated form ready to be dissolved in water. The DP was divided into two packages, the first package contained 17.3 g of DP or P given in the breakfast and dissolved in 250 ml and the second package was given at the dinner time, and contained 34.7 g of P and DP dissolved in 300 ml of water. Dietary compliance. Dietary compliance was assessed with a 24-h dietary recall and 3-d food record (food lo), during each visit that was analyzed by food processor nutrition analysis software. The compliance of the consumption of the DP or P was evaluated with the number of empty packages returned at the following visit. Physical activity was assessed using the International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDP

a package containing a mix of functional foods

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

a package containing maltodextrins and caseinate calcium to mimic the DP

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

PD and placebo interventions were packaged identically in appearance, both the researcher and the participant did not know what type of maneuver was assigned. The packages were distributed by a person outside the study who was the same person who performed the randomization

Intervention model description

In the first stage, the participants with metabolic syndrome consumed a reduced-energy diet tailored to provide a 500 kcal/d deficit as recommended by NIH with respect to their habitual diet for 15 days. In the second stage, the participants continued to consume the reduced energy diet with the addition of a combination of functional foods (dietary portfolio; DP). The DP provided 200 kcal that were subtracted from the diet. The kcal, appearance, and flavor were similar in DP and P. The DP and P were given in a package in a dehydrated form ready to be dissolved in water. The DP was divided into two packages, the first package contained 30 g of DP o P given in the breakfast and dissolved in 250ml and the second package was given at the dinner time and contained 30 g of P and DP dissolved in 250 mL of water.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria for controls (healthy) * Male or female * Adults between 20 and 60 years old * BMI ≥ 20 to ≤ 25 kg/m2 * Patients with no criteria positive metabolic syndrome * Patients who knew how to read and write * Signature of informed consent Inclusion Criteria of cases * Male or female * Adults between 20 and 60 years old * BMI ≥ 25to ≤ 50 kg/m2 * Patients with 3 positive criteria of the metabolic syndrome * Glucose \> 100 to \< 126 mg / dl * Triglycerides \> 150 mg / dl * HDL-cholesterol: men \< 40mg / dl and women \<50 mg / dl * Waist circumference \> 80cm in women and\> 90 cm in men * Blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg (in two different days) * Patients who knew how to read and write * Signature of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* \- Patients with any type of diabetes. * Diseases that produce secondary obesity or diabetes * Cardiovascular event * Weight loss \> 3 kgs in the last 3 months after the evaluation of the criteria * Catabolic diseases such as cancer and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome * Gravity status * Positive smoking * Treatment with medications * Treatment with antihypertensive drugs * Treatment with hypoglycemic agents or insulin and antidiabetics. * Treatment with statins, fibrates or other drugs to control the dyslipidemia. * Use of steroid medications, chemotherapy, immunosuppressants or radiotherapy. * Anorexigens or accelerate weight loss. * Any drug or medication that activates intestinal motility * Laxatives or antispasmodics 4 weeks before the study * Treatment with antibiotics 2 months before the study * Patients with a digestive functional disorder (constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, functional abdominal distension) (determined by questionnaire based on the classification of Rome II). * Inflammatory bowel disease * Irritable bowel syndrome or other chronic gastrointestinal diseases * Major surgery * Treatment with pro / pre / symbiotic * High fiber foods consumption (more than 15 grams of fiber)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intestinal microbiotachange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineFecal samples were collected to isolate DNA and sequenced using the Illumina platform

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
insulinchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum insulin (µU/ml)
glycated hemoglobinchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineplasma glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)
triglycerideschange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum triglycerides (mg/dl)
cholesterolchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum total cholesterol (mg/dl)
glucosechange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum glucose (mg/dl)
HDL cholesterolchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum HDL- cholesterol (mg/dl)
LPSchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselinelipopolysaccharide (LPS) (ng/ml)
CRPchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum C reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dl)
LDL cholesterolchange after 2.5 months of dietary intervention with respect to baselineserum LDL- cholesterol (mg/dl)

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026