Skip to content

Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants for Nerve Blocks

A Randomized Comparison Between Perineural Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Blocks

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03610893
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-08-01
Start date
2018-08-16
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2019-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Acute, Pain, Postoperative, Upper Extremity Injury

Keywords

nerve block adjuvants, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, nerve block duration

Brief summary

When used as perineural (PN) adjuvants to local anesthetics (LAs), dexamethasone (DX) and dexmedetomidine (DXD) have been well documented to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. These drugs have important differences in terms of cost and safety profiles. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare PN DX and PN DXD for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (ICBs). Since analgesic and sensory duration can be influenced by factors different to block, motor block duration is the main outcome. The protocol is designed as an equivalency trial and hypothesize that both drugs result in similar durations. The equivalency margin is set at 3 hrs.

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone as perineural local anesthetic adjuvant

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine as perineural local anesthetic adjuvant

Sponsors

University of Chile
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 18 and 75 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3 * body mass index between 20 and 35

Exclusion criteria

* adults who are unable to give their own consent * pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) * coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50) * renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100) * hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100) * allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) * pregnancy * prior surgery in the infraclavicular region * chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor block duration24 hours after blockElapsed time since the end of LA injection until return of hand and fingers movement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic block duration24 hours after blockElapsed time since the end of LA injection until first sensation of pain in surgical area
Block performance time1 hour before surgeryElapsed time from skin desinfection until the end of LA injection
Intensity of pain during block procedure1 hour before surgeryEvaluated with a numeric rating score from 0 to 10
Block onset time1 hour before surgeryTime required to reach a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points
Sensory and motor block score30 minutes post injectionSensorimotor block assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneus, medium, radial and ulnar nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, patient cannot feel cold or touch. Motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis. Succesfull blocks at 30 minutes correlate with a final score ( sum of all individual sensory and motor scores) of at least 14 points out of 16.
Incidence of complete block30 minutes post injectionPercentage of blocks with a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points at 30 minutes post injection
Sensory block duration24 hours after blockElapsed time since the end of LA injection until return of hand and fingers sensation
Perioperative median artery pressure (MAP)2 hours after surgeryAverage of MAP and HR registered during preblock, intraoperative and up to 2 hours of postoperative period
Perioperative heart rate (HR)2 hours after surgeryAverage MAP registered during preblock, intraoperative and up to 2 hours of postoperative period
Postoperative persistent sedation2 hours after surgeryPersistent sedation after surgery using Ramsay sedation scale. 1= anxious agitated or restless; 2= co-operative, oriented and tranquil; 3= responds to command only; 4= brisk response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 5= sluggish response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 6= no response.
Respiratory depression2 hours after surgeryLow respiratory rate (lower than 8 breaths per minute) or persistent oxygen requirement (pulse oximetry lower than 90% without supplementary oxygen)
Incidence of block side effects2 hours after surgeryPresence of paresthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, pneumothorax, hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, Horner syndrome or hoarseness
Persistent neurologic deficit7 days post surgeryPresence of persistent sensory or motor postoperative deficit
Perioperative glycemic levelsPerioperative periodCapillary dextrose measurements at pre block, 1 hour post-surgery and 6 hours post-surgery

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026