Skip to content

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon After Bare Metal Stent Implantation vs. Drug-Eluting Stent in St Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon After Bare Metal Stent Implantation Versus Drug-eluting Stent in St Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03610347
Acronym
PEBSI-2
Enrollment
199
Registered
2018-08-01
Start date
2016-06-29
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2020-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Brief summary

Study objective is the evaluation of safety and efficacy at 12 months of the combination treatment of bare metal Stent plus Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon vs drug eluting stent in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with less than 12 hours of evolution.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open study After the permeabilization of the clinical event responsible artery patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: Group 1: insertion of a bare metal stent with post-dilatation with a paclitaxel eluting balloon (Pantera Lux ®) Group 2: insertion of a drug elution stent Patients (or their legal representative) must sign the consent before randomization. Patients will be monitored 30 days after surgery, at 6 and 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint is Target Vessel Failure (TVF) at 12 months This study will involve patients over 18 years old with STEMI, or new left bundle branch block or posterior AMI (ECG) that occur within 12 hours of onset of symptoms. A total of 516 patients will be included.

Interventions

DEVICEDrug Eluting Stent

Sponsors

Effice Servicios Para la Investigacion S.L.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Fundacion Investigacion Interhospitalaria Cardiovascular
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged equal or older than 18 years. * Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 12 hours of evolution (from the onset of symptoms) systolic time elevation of at least 1 mm (recorded in two or more contiguous leads), new left bundle branch block, or true posterior infarction. * Patients candidates for primary angioplasty as medical criteria * Written informed consent according to International Conference on Harmonization / Guide Clinical Practice and local legislation, obtained before any study procedure. * Diameter vascular coronary artery to treat between 2 mm and 4 mm. * Patients with 85-100% stenosis and TIMI Score (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) of 0-I.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who refuse to participate in the study * Cardiogenic shock (defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg for more than 30 minutes or need for vasopressors or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation) * Concomitant diseases associated with a life expectancy of less than one year * Angiographic variables: * Trunk unprotected * Branching (side branch greater than 2.5 mm) * Sinus tachycardia segment elevation myocardial infarction thrombosis secondary to stent * If more than one stent to treat a single segment (overlapping stents) * Patient candidate for surgical revascularization within 30 days * Stenosis of greater than 30 mm in length (corresponding with the ball longer available) * More severe stenosis in the same artery in which is expected to be addressed in the next 9 months * Women at childbearing age, where there is the possibility of pregnancy during the first year of follow-up, or nursing. * Any clinical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, is considered clinically significant as to participate in the study. * Subjects who are participating in any study drug or medical. * Individuals who show inability to follow instructions or help during the course of the study. * Bleeding diathesis or other disorders such as gastrointestinal ulceration or cerebral circulatory disorders, restricting the use of treatments platelet aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulants. * Patients with an ejection fraction \<30% (if known). * Allergy or hypersensitivity to paclitaxel intolerance, or compounds structurally related to the Butyryl tri-n-hexyl citrate (BTHC) matrix of administration. * Severe allergy to contrast media. * Coronary artery spasm in the absence of significant stenosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)1 yearEfficacy: TVF define as a the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)1 yearEfficacy: ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)1 yearSafety: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 12 months (death, re-infarction, acute cardiovascular disease, hemorrhagy and/or stent thrombosis).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic Substudy9 monthsQCA late loss
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Substudy3 and 6 monthsStent struts coverage by intravascular OCT

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026