Skip to content

Does the Suture-spanning Augmentation of Single-row Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reduce the Retear Rate?

Does the Arthroscopic Suture-spanning Augmentation of Single-row Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reduce the Retear Rate?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03609164
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-08-01
Start date
2015-05-01
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tear

Keywords

arthroscopic surgery, massive rotator cuff repair, single-row repair, suture-spanning augmentation

Brief summary

There are several associated structural changes when dealing with massive rotator cuff repair, which include tendon retraction and fragility, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration, as well as osteoporosis over the tendon insertion. Those changes may lead to difficult in applying double-row repair, suture cutting through the tendon, too much tension over the repair and loosening or pull-out of anchors, which may results in poor tendon-bone healing and subsequent high re-tear rate. Therefore decreasing the tension over the repair site may increase the healing over tendon bone junction as well as decrease the risk of anchors loosening. A suture-spanning augmentation with two set of suture loops passing over musculotendinous junction medially and fixed with anchor at the lateral cortical wall may solve the problem. In order to define the clinical benefit of this adjuvant procedure, a prospective randomized control study is designed to compare the adjunctive reinforce suture with the single-row simple suture repair in massive rotator cuff tear. Around sixty patients were randomized divided into two groups. The study group was used adjunctive reinforce suture repair technique, which was one lateral cortical anchor holding 2 separated set of transverse looping sutures over the medial musculotendinous junction in addition to single row repair, while the control group was used single row repair technique in simple stitch fashion. All patients will have clinical evaluation in pain (VAS score) and functional recovery (ASES and UCLA score) as well as MRI image for the tendon integrity. If the suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair can yield an improved healing rate and fewer complications, massive rotator cuff tear should be repaired earlier in order to prevent the late development of irreparable tear.

Interventions

PROCEDURESuture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the pre-operative image (MRI) showing the massive rotator cuff tear (fulfilling one of the following definition a tear with a diameter of 5 cm or more; a complete tear of two or more tendons; one with a coronal length and sagittal width greater than or equal to 2 cm) * patient was willing and able to provide scores for the study

Exclusion criteria

* irreparable rotator cuff tear which was identified pre-operatively or intra-operatively * glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis * stage III or more of the fatty degenerative of supraspinatus in Goutallier classification * revision surgery * patients with bacteremia, a systemic infection, or an infection at the surgical site * patients who previously attempted or failed a treatment program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retear rate6 monthsUsing MR imaging to determine the presence or absence of rotator cuff retears

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Score (VAS)2 yearsRecord the VAS (pain level from 0-10) by the questionnaire, pre-op/post-op 2-year
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score2 yearsRecord the ASES score by the questionnaire, focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living, pre-op/post-op 2year
University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA Shoulder Score)2 yearsRecord the UCLA shoulder score by the questionnaire, focusing on five sub-scales made up of: active forward elevation and strength (physician reported), pain, satisfaction, and function (patient reported), pre-op/post-op 2-year
Shoulder constant score2 yearsRecord the shoulder constant score by the questionnaire, focusing on ROM, functional assessment, strength measure, pre-op/post-op 2-year

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026