Skip to content

Patient Specific Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures

Patient Specific Three-Dimensional Titanium Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures. (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03608891
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-08-01
Start date
2018-07-31
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2018-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Brief summary

The aim of the current study is to evaluate and assess the clinical stability and efficacy of patient specific computer guided titanium plates versus the conventional titanium mini plates regarding accurate reduction and fixation of mandibular body fractures, reducing the operating time, achieving precise bone alignment and reducing the plate palpability.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted on two groups: Intervention group: patient specific three-dimensional titanium plates CBCT or CT scan will be performed for the patient, the dicom files will be imported into a surgical planning software , plates will then be designed virtually and sent for three-dimensional (3D) printing. Control group: Conventional miniplates: In this group two miniplates of titanium Mini-System 2.0 mm will be used. The plate has profile height 1.0 mm whereas the screw length varies according to the site of the plate. According to Champy osteosynthesis lines for fixation of the posterior mandibular fracture ,the first plate will be placed at the inferior border from the buccal side, using bicortical screws engaging the buccal and lingual cortices to achieve rigid fixation, while the second plate will be placed at about 5mm superior to the inferior plate in the subapical region, using monocortical screws engaging only the buccal cortex to avoid injuring the teeth roots.

Interventions

DEVICEComputer guided patient specific 3D titanium plate

CBCT or CT scan will be done preoperatively and dicom files will be imported to mimics software to design and print the patient specific 3D titanium plate.

In this group two miniplates of titanium Mini-System 2.0 mm will be used. The plate has profile height 1.0 mm whereas the screw length varies according to the site of the plate. According to Champy osteosynthesis lines for fixation of the posterior mandibular fracture ,the first plate will be placed at the inferior border from the buccal side, using bicortical screws engaging the buccal and lingual cortices to achieve rigid fixation, while the second plate will be placed at about 5mm superior to the inferior plate in the subapical region, using monocortical screws engaging only the buccal cortex to avoid injuring the teeth roots.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with unilateral mandibular body fractures, not associated with other mandibular and maxillofacial fractures

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral mandibular fractures * Patients with other mandibular or maxillofacial fractures * Comminuted fractures * Medical problem that may interfere with the procedure such as bleeding disorder and pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction measured with visual analogue scale (0-10)Measured immediately after the surgerypatient satisfaction is defined as patient-reported outcome measure while the structures and processes of care can be measured by patient-reported experiences (30). Measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (29) of 0-10 ,with zero being unsatisfied and 10 being satisfied. Patient Satisfaction is assessed regarding prescence of pain, occlusal discrepencies and overall patient satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture gap distance0 and 3 monthsThis is done using CBCT through measuring the fracture gap distance in millimeters to evaluate proper reduction and fixation
Occlusal bite force0 and 3 monthsThe biting force will be measured through the follow up visits (1 week,3 months) by the bite force recorder at the incisor region, right and left molar region. The measurement of the bite force will be undertaken using a portable type of occlusal force gauge (GM10, Nagano Keiki, Japan) called OCCLUSAL FORCE-METER GM10. (36)
Operating timetime of the surgeryThe time of the surgery will be recorded using a stopwatch.
Plate palpability0 and 3 monthsMeasured during all follow up visits, by questioning the patient ,where the patient will be informed of the site of the plates ,and asked if he feels the plates are palpable ,and will be measured by binary measuring unit (yes/no) , also the plates will be palpated by the operator at follow up visits.

Contacts

Primary ContactDina A Alei El Dine, Postgraduate
dinaadelta3lab@gmail.com01285568850

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026