Skip to content

Genetic Influences on Response to Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease

Genetic Influences on Response to Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03607695
Acronym
Gen-Ex
Enrollment
19
Registered
2018-07-31
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2021-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

gait, exercise, cognition, genetics

Brief summary

The aging Veteran population, together with high exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicides during military service, has made diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD), currently affecting more than 80,000 Veterans, a major health issue in the Veterans' health system. Mobility and cognitive limitations are a common problem in PD and are associated with significant disability, increased fall risk, reduced quality of life, and increased caregiver burden. While less is known about its benefit on cognition, physical therapy has proven to be an effective treatment to mitigate mobility limitations, though the response to rehabilitation interventions is highly variable. The proposed research will inform the investigators' understanding of the impact of certain genetic profiles associated with learning impairments on motor and cognitive benefits in response to gait rehabilitation, and will provide an important foundation for more personalized and improved gait rehabilitation programs for different subgroups of PD patients.

Detailed description

The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 marked the beginning of the genomic era and the birth of personalized (precision) medicine. In the last decade, genetics have provided a new understanding of predicting, diagnosing, and treating individual health conditions. Indeed, such precision medicine has begun to impact virtually all areas of medicine, with significant potential to influence the timing, dosage, and intensity of physical rehabilitation. The long-term goals of this research are: (1) to determine if certain genetic variants associated to learning impairments impact the motor and cognitive benefit experienced in response to physical rehabilitation in Veterans with Parkinson's disease (PD), and (2) to use that knowledge to identify subpopulations of patients that may require rehabilitative strategies tailored to their genotype to optimize physical rehabilitation. To achieve these goals the investigators will enroll 30 Veterans with PD in a 10-week moderate intensity gait training program consisting of 2 times per week treadmill training with verbal cues for gait quality. Aim 1 will examine the association between variants in 2 genes known to affect cognition and motor learning (APOE- 4 and BDNF-Met66), and motor improvements after gait training. Specifically, changes in walking from during and after training will be sensitively and objectively assessed using state-of-the-art quantitative gait analysis, and compared between three genotype groups (carriers of BDNF-Met66 (N=10), carriers of APOE- 4 (N=10) and those not carrying either of those variants (N=10)). Aim 2 will examine the effect of APOE- 4 and BDNF-Met66 genetic variants on cognitive changes in response to this training program. In order to do this the investigators will measure cognitive performance pre- and post-training using a brief, targeted battery aimed at assessing attention, processing speed, executive function, and learning/memory, the domains more affected, and more likely to improve with physical exercise in PD. The investigators will test the hypothesis that Veterans with PD who carry an APOE- 4 or BDNF-Met66 allele will demonstrate smaller improvements in gait (Aim 1) and cognition (Aim 2) in response to a 10-week gait training program. Overall the results of this project will enhance the investigators' knowledge regarding the influence of different genetic profiles in the response to physical rehabilitation in Veterans with PD, and will generate supporting data that will translate to more personalized and effective rehabilitation programs for people with PD.

Interventions

OTHERGait training

Walking on a treadmill and receiving audio cues to improve gait

Sponsors

University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The intervention is a 10-week gait, treadmill-training program. The sessions are 1 hour long, twice a week.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet UK Brain Bank (UKBB) criteria for the diagnosis of PD (modified so that having more than one affected relative was not considered an

Exclusion criteria

) * Have a Hoehn & Yahr score of 3 * Have the ability to walk 400 m without physical assistance from a device or another person * Do not have other health conditions (e.g., orthopedic, cardiopulmonary) that impact the ability to safely participate in a moderately intense gait training program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait Speed (m/s)measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 10 weeks and 16 weeksThe investigators will use the APDM Movement Monitoring system to assess gait speed (m/s) during straight-line walking as a measure of gait function.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scoremeasured at baseline and at 10 weeksThe investigators will use the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; score range=0-30, with 30 indicating better cognitive function) as a reflection of global cognitive function

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gait Training
1 hour walking exercise on a treadmill Gait training: Walking on a treadmill and receiving verbal cues to improve gait quality
19
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
10 WeekLocal and institutional restrictions on research enacted due to COVID-19 pandemic1
16 WeekLocal and institutional restrictions on research enacted due to COVID-19 pandemic2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGait Training
Age, Continuous66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Gait Speed (m/s)

The investigators will use the APDM Movement Monitoring system to assess gait speed (m/s) during straight-line walking as a measure of gait function.

Time frame: measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 10 weeks and 16 weeks

Population: Three participants did not complete the 16 week (follow-up) visit due to local and institutional restrictions on research implemented early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait TrainingGait Speed (m/s)Baseline1.14 m/sStandard Deviation 0.16
Gait TrainingGait Speed (m/s)2 week1.21 m/sStandard Deviation 0.16
Gait TrainingGait Speed (m/s)10 week1.22 m/sStandard Deviation 0.17
Gait TrainingGait Speed (m/s)16 week1.20 m/sStandard Deviation 0.12
Primary

Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score

The investigators will use the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; score range=0-30, with 30 indicating better cognitive function) as a reflection of global cognitive function

Time frame: measured at baseline and at 10 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gait TrainingMontreal Cognitive Assessment ScoreBaseline27.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Gait TrainingMontreal Cognitive Assessment ScoreWeek 1027.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026