Skip to content

Teaching Academic Success Skills to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders in Clinical Setting

Teaching Academic Success Skills to Middle School Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) With Executive Functioning Deficits - in Clinical Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03606343
Acronym
TASK-R21
Enrollment
21
Registered
2018-07-30
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits. Aim 1: Use focus group methodology and advice from expert consultants to develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD). Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials to assess initial feasibility and efficacy.

Detailed description

The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits. Aim 1: Develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD). A methodologically rigorous, well-integrated iterative and collaborative design process with input from multiple stakeholders, including school mental health professionals, teachers, parents, and youth with ASD, will be utilized. Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials including the feasibility of: 1) implementing the measurement protocol, 2) operationalizing intervention delivery, 3) assessing both trained and untrained areas of functioning, 4) assessing whether improvements in academic EF skills (proposed mechanism of treatment) are related to functional educational outcomes (e.g., homework behaviors, grades), and 5) exploring the data for potential treatment moderators (e.g., gender, severity). It is hypothesized that TASK will be feasible, acceptable (attendance, satisfaction), and will result in improved academic EF skills associated with reduced academic impairment and homework problems.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTeaching Academic Skills to Kids

Group treatment

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder * IQ \>80 * 7th grade at time of intervention * mainstreamed classroom * executive functioning problems identified on parent or teacher BRIEF-2

Exclusion criteria

* danger to self or others

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Children's Organizational Skills Scalebaseline, 3 monthsThe Children's Organizational Skills Scale is a rating scale of organization and executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer organization/executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores as rated by the parent.
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Editionbaseline, 3 monthsThe Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition is a parent rating scale of executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.
Homework Problem Checklistbaseline, 3 monthsThe Homework Problem Checklist is a rating scale of homework behavior completed by the parent. There are two subscales generated: Homework Completion Behaviors & Homework Management Behaviors. Scale is rated on a 0 = never to 3 = very often scale and a sum of scores is computed for each subscale. Range of scores for Homework Completion Behaviors is 0 to 36. Range of scores for Homework Management Behaviors is 0 to 21. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) scores for each subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtestbaseline, 3 monthsThe Woodcock Johnson is an academic performance measure administered to the child. A standard score of 100 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 15 (range of 40 to 170). Lower standard scores are worse. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) for the Basic Writing subtest.
Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscalebaseline, 3 monthsThe Parenting Relationship Questionnaire is completed by parents to describe their parenting relationship with the teen. A T-score is reported for the Communication subscale. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Lower T-scores indicate poorer communication. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.
Classroom Performance Surveybaseline, 3 monthsThe Classroom Performance Survey is a teacher rating scale of classroom behavior. The scale is rated 1 = always to 5 = never. An academic competence mean score is computed (range 1 to 5) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) total mean score.
Academic Performance Rating Systembaseline, 3 monthsThe Academic Performance Rating System is a teacher rating scale of academic performance. Items are rated 1 = Never to 5 = Very often and the items are summed to generate a Total Score (range 19 to 95) with higher scores worse indicating a worse outcome. We present the Total score at baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Youth with ASD without ID attending middle school and their parents were recruited in the 2018-2019 academic school year via letters, flyers, and emails targeted at individuals who had received services at a hospital outpatient clinic specializing in assessment and treatment of autism.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open Trial
Group based treatment targeting academic executive functioning skills such as organization, planning, and study skills. Likely to be 7 90-minute sessions attended weekly by parents and teens Teaching Academic Skills to Kids: Group treatment
21
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen Trial
Age, Continuous12.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Kauffman Brief Intelligence Test - Second Edition109.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition is a parent rating scale of executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second EditionBaseline Parent General Executive Composite T-Scor71.86 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.62
Open TrialBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition3 month Parent General Executive Composite T-Scor66.57 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.78
Primary

Children's Organizational Skills Scale

The Children's Organizational Skills Scale is a rating scale of organization and executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer organization/executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores as rated by the parent.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialChildren's Organizational Skills ScaleBaseline Parent Total COSS T-Score66.14 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 9.43
Open TrialChildren's Organizational Skills Scale3 months Parent Total COSS T-Score57.24 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 9.96
Primary

Homework Problem Checklist

The Homework Problem Checklist is a rating scale of homework behavior completed by the parent. There are two subscales generated: Homework Completion Behaviors & Homework Management Behaviors. Scale is rated on a 0 = never to 3 = very often scale and a sum of scores is computed for each subscale. Range of scores for Homework Completion Behaviors is 0 to 36. Range of scores for Homework Management Behaviors is 0 to 21. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) scores for each subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialHomework Problem ChecklistBaseline Homework Completion Behaviors24.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.58
Open TrialHomework Problem Checklist3 Month Homework Completion Behaviors15.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Open TrialHomework Problem ChecklistBaseline Homework Management Behaviors8.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09
Open TrialHomework Problem Checklist3 Month Homework Management Behaviors4.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Academic Performance Rating System

The Academic Performance Rating System is a teacher rating scale of academic performance. Items are rated 1 = Never to 5 = Very often and the items are summed to generate a Total Score (range 19 to 95) with higher scores worse indicating a worse outcome. We present the Total score at baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention).

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialAcademic Performance Rating SystemBaseline APRS Total45.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.14
Open TrialAcademic Performance Rating System3 Month APRS Total52.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.58
Secondary

Classroom Performance Survey

The Classroom Performance Survey is a teacher rating scale of classroom behavior. The scale is rated 1 = always to 5 = never. An academic competence mean score is computed (range 1 to 5) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) total mean score.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialClassroom Performance SurveyBaseline Academic Competence2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Open TrialClassroom Performance Survey3 Month Academic Competence1.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Secondary

Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale

The Parenting Relationship Questionnaire is completed by parents to describe their parenting relationship with the teen. A T-score is reported for the Communication subscale. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Lower T-scores indicate poorer communication. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialParenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication SubscaleBaseline Communication T-Score41.1 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 8.7
Open TrialParenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale3 Month Communication T-Score43.2 T-ScoreStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest

The Woodcock Johnson is an academic performance measure administered to the child. A standard score of 100 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 15 (range of 40 to 170). Lower standard scores are worse. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) for the Basic Writing subtest.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open TrialWoodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing SubtestBaseline WJ-III Basic Writing103.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.91
Open TrialWoodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest3 Month WJ-III Basic Writing105.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026