Autism Spectrum Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits. Aim 1: Use focus group methodology and advice from expert consultants to develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD). Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials to assess initial feasibility and efficacy.
Detailed description
The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits. Aim 1: Develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD). A methodologically rigorous, well-integrated iterative and collaborative design process with input from multiple stakeholders, including school mental health professionals, teachers, parents, and youth with ASD, will be utilized. Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials including the feasibility of: 1) implementing the measurement protocol, 2) operationalizing intervention delivery, 3) assessing both trained and untrained areas of functioning, 4) assessing whether improvements in academic EF skills (proposed mechanism of treatment) are related to functional educational outcomes (e.g., homework behaviors, grades), and 5) exploring the data for potential treatment moderators (e.g., gender, severity). It is hypothesized that TASK will be feasible, acceptable (attendance, satisfaction), and will result in improved academic EF skills associated with reduced academic impairment and homework problems.
Interventions
Group treatment
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Open trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder * IQ \>80 * 7th grade at time of intervention * mainstreamed classroom * executive functioning problems identified on parent or teacher BRIEF-2
Exclusion criteria
* danger to self or others
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Children's Organizational Skills Scale | baseline, 3 months | The Children's Organizational Skills Scale is a rating scale of organization and executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer organization/executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores as rated by the parent. |
| Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition | baseline, 3 months | The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition is a parent rating scale of executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores. |
| Homework Problem Checklist | baseline, 3 months | The Homework Problem Checklist is a rating scale of homework behavior completed by the parent. There are two subscales generated: Homework Completion Behaviors & Homework Management Behaviors. Scale is rated on a 0 = never to 3 = very often scale and a sum of scores is computed for each subscale. Range of scores for Homework Completion Behaviors is 0 to 36. Range of scores for Homework Management Behaviors is 0 to 21. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) scores for each subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest | baseline, 3 months | The Woodcock Johnson is an academic performance measure administered to the child. A standard score of 100 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 15 (range of 40 to 170). Lower standard scores are worse. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) for the Basic Writing subtest. |
| Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale | baseline, 3 months | The Parenting Relationship Questionnaire is completed by parents to describe their parenting relationship with the teen. A T-score is reported for the Communication subscale. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Lower T-scores indicate poorer communication. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores. |
| Classroom Performance Survey | baseline, 3 months | The Classroom Performance Survey is a teacher rating scale of classroom behavior. The scale is rated 1 = always to 5 = never. An academic competence mean score is computed (range 1 to 5) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) total mean score. |
| Academic Performance Rating System | baseline, 3 months | The Academic Performance Rating System is a teacher rating scale of academic performance. Items are rated 1 = Never to 5 = Very often and the items are summed to generate a Total Score (range 19 to 95) with higher scores worse indicating a worse outcome. We present the Total score at baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Youth with ASD without ID attending middle school and their parents were recruited in the 2018-2019 academic school year via letters, flyers, and emails targeted at individuals who had received services at a hospital outpatient clinic specializing in assessment and treatment of autism.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Open Trial Group based treatment targeting academic executive functioning skills such as organization, planning, and study skills. Likely to be 7 90-minute sessions attended weekly by parents and teens
Teaching Academic Skills to Kids: Group treatment | 21 |
| Total | 21 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Open Trial |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 12.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 20 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Kauffman Brief Intelligence Test - Second Edition | 109.7 scores on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 21 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 16 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 21 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 21 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 21 |
Outcome results
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition is a parent rating scale of executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition | Baseline Parent General Executive Composite T-Scor | 71.86 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
| Open Trial | Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition | 3 month Parent General Executive Composite T-Scor | 66.57 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.78 |
Children's Organizational Skills Scale
The Children's Organizational Skills Scale is a rating scale of organization and executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer organization/executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores as rated by the parent.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Children's Organizational Skills Scale | Baseline Parent Total COSS T-Score | 66.14 T-Score | Standard Deviation 9.43 |
| Open Trial | Children's Organizational Skills Scale | 3 months Parent Total COSS T-Score | 57.24 T-Score | Standard Deviation 9.96 |
Homework Problem Checklist
The Homework Problem Checklist is a rating scale of homework behavior completed by the parent. There are two subscales generated: Homework Completion Behaviors & Homework Management Behaviors. Scale is rated on a 0 = never to 3 = very often scale and a sum of scores is computed for each subscale. Range of scores for Homework Completion Behaviors is 0 to 36. Range of scores for Homework Management Behaviors is 0 to 21. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) scores for each subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Homework Problem Checklist | Baseline Homework Completion Behaviors | 24.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| Open Trial | Homework Problem Checklist | 3 Month Homework Completion Behaviors | 15.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.63 |
| Open Trial | Homework Problem Checklist | Baseline Homework Management Behaviors | 8.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.09 |
| Open Trial | Homework Problem Checklist | 3 Month Homework Management Behaviors | 4.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Academic Performance Rating System
The Academic Performance Rating System is a teacher rating scale of academic performance. Items are rated 1 = Never to 5 = Very often and the items are summed to generate a Total Score (range 19 to 95) with higher scores worse indicating a worse outcome. We present the Total score at baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention).
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Academic Performance Rating System | Baseline APRS Total | 45.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.14 |
| Open Trial | Academic Performance Rating System | 3 Month APRS Total | 52.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.58 |
Classroom Performance Survey
The Classroom Performance Survey is a teacher rating scale of classroom behavior. The scale is rated 1 = always to 5 = never. An academic competence mean score is computed (range 1 to 5) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) total mean score.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Classroom Performance Survey | Baseline Academic Competence | 2.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Open Trial | Classroom Performance Survey | 3 Month Academic Competence | 1.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale
The Parenting Relationship Questionnaire is completed by parents to describe their parenting relationship with the teen. A T-score is reported for the Communication subscale. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Lower T-scores indicate poorer communication. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale | Baseline Communication T-Score | 41.1 T-Score | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Open Trial | Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale | 3 Month Communication T-Score | 43.2 T-Score | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest
The Woodcock Johnson is an academic performance measure administered to the child. A standard score of 100 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 15 (range of 40 to 170). Lower standard scores are worse. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) for the Basic Writing subtest.
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Trial | Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest | Baseline WJ-III Basic Writing | 103.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.91 |
| Open Trial | Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest | 3 Month WJ-III Basic Writing | 105.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.51 |