Skip to content

68Ga-RM2 Compared to 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Imaging According to Various Metastatic Risks

Exploratory, Single-institution Study, Comparing 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT Versus 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in Patients Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer of Various Metastatic Risks Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy - "UROPET"

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03604757
Acronym
UROPET
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-07-27
Start date
2018-04-25
Completion date
2019-12-19
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate Cancer, 68Ga-RM2, bombesin, GRP-R, 68Ga-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen, PSMA, PET/CT

Brief summary

Patients with primary prostate cancer (low, intermediate or high metastatic risk) for whom radical prostatectomy is indicated, will be invited to participate to the present study. Positron Emission Tomography coupled with scanner (PET-CT) using a radiotracer : 68Ga-RM2 and Positron Emission Tomography coupled with scanner (PET-CT) using another radiotracer : 68Ga-PSMA-617, will be scheduled.

Detailed description

Approximately 15% of men with prostate cancer have high-risk disease at diagnosis. For these patients the accuracy of initial staging is of critical importance for treatment decision-making. Recommended imaging modalities for initial staging include computerized tomography (CT) scan, bone scan, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). In addition to initial work-up, 18F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography coupled with scanner (PET-CT) may be proposed in some high-risk patients but its sensitivity for lymph node detection remains limited. Nowadays, new radiotracers are becoming available for prostate cancer imaging. Among them, PET-CT imaging with radiolabeled ligands of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) could be more sensitive and more specific for the detection of lymph node metastasis in high-risk cancers, as it is the case with radiolabeled PSMA-617 which has demonstrated very promising results in men with metastatic prostate cancer in recent studies. Therefore, PET imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-617 may participate to optimize work-up in the staging of high-risk patients. Another family of radiopharmaceuticals aimed to target the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRP-R) which is overexpressed in low-grade prostatic carcinomas. GRP-R expression is correlated with androgen receptor expression and with better outcomes. Various radiolabeled GRP analogues have been developed and one of them, 68Ga-RM2, has shown very promising preclinical results. A study in 14 patients with prostate cancer showed encouraging results as related to the detection of primary prostate cancer and metastatic lymph nodes as well as in detection of local recurrence in the prostate bed and nodal relapse. However, 68Ga-RM2 failed to show some bone metastases in hormone-refractory patients. 68Ga-RM2 has also been recently used and compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11 for targeting biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. These radiotracers may offer complementary performances in lymph nodes detection due to their distinct pharmacokinetics. Since 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-617 target different cell populations, combining these two radiopharmaceuticals in patients could be of additional value. The aim of this pilot study is to compare 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT to 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT in 24 patients with prostate cancer of various progression risks to better understand how they could performed a metastatic risk mapping and how they could be used (or combined) in clinical practice.

Interventions

PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-617 injection

PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-RM2 injection

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: 24 patients divided in : * 6 patients with low risk prostate cancer (Gleason score ≤ 6 and cT1-T2a and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) value \< 10 ng/mL) * 12 patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or cT2b or PSA value 10-20 ng/mL) divided in : 6 patients who are Gleason score 7(3+4) (favourable intermediate risk) 6 patients who are Gleason score 7(4+3) (unfavourable intermediate risk) * 6 patients with high risk prostate cancer (Gleason \> 7 or cT2c or PSA value \> 20 ng/mL) * Candidate for radical prostatectomy after discussion in multidisciplinary committee * Covered by the national health insurance system * Written informed consent willingly obtained

Exclusion criteria

: * any kind of previous treatment for prostate cancer (hormonal treatment, EBRT, brachytherapy, cryotherapy, etc…); * patient not candidate for radical prostatectomy and/or unable to benefit from surgery * freedom deprivated patient by judiciary or administrative decision * patient under legal protection or unable to express its own consent * patient within exclusion period from another clinical trial * known contraindication to radiopharmaceuticals and / or excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)Day 0 (inclusion) or Day 2 to 21 (Visit 2)Median Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of 68Ga-PSMA-617

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Gleason scoreDay 3 to 60 (Last visit)
Receptor density BmaxDay 0 (inclusion) or Day 2 to 21 (Visit 2)
Local radioactive concentration (cpm)Day 0 (inclusion) or Day 2 to 21 (Visit 2)
Immunoreactive score (IRS)Day 3 to 60 (Last visit)

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCLERMONT-GALLERANDE Henri

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026