Skip to content

Sonographic Hysterosalpingography: Oil vs Water Based Media (SHOW Trial)

Therapeutic Effect of Sonographic Hysterosalpingography: Oil vs Water Based Media

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03604549
Enrollment
58
Registered
2018-07-27
Start date
2019-01-11
Completion date
2021-08-25
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Brief summary

Performing fluoroscopic HSG with oil based contrast medium has been shown to increase pregnancy rates in a subfertile population. This is a pilot study to test the efficacy of as well as the tolerability and safety of using lipid based oil medium for sonographic based hysterosalpingography (Sono HSG) compared to water based contrast (i.e. normal saline) for women seeking fertility. The double blind study will randomize 56 women at the time of Sono HSG in a 1:1 ratio to receive through the SHG catheter either up to 10 cc of Lipiodol UF® or normal saline. The investigators will collect subjective pain experience and follow the subjects for 6 months after the test for pregnancy and collect all adverse events during and after the procedure.

Interventions

DRUGLipiodol UF

Up to 10cc of Lipiodol Ultra Fluid will be infused via intrauterine catheter

DRUGSaline

Up to 10cc of saline will be infused via intrauterine catheter

Sponsors

Guerbet
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for Sono HSG for fertility testing * In good general health * Willing and capable of complying with the study procedures * At least one patent tube and no endometrial pathology on Sono HSG * Ready to undergo infertility treatment immediately after the test * Not planning on IVF therapy in the next 6 mos

Exclusion criteria

* Known tubal or endometrial (polyp, submucous fibroid, etc.) pathology * At high risk for tubal disease due to history of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease * Known hypersensitivity to Lipiodol UF®or known allergy to iodine containing contrast media or shellfish * Endometrial pathology on Sono HSG requiring further evaluation (as per the performing physician) * Bilateral tubal occlusion on Sono HSG * Unable to tolerate potential pain associated with the study. * Requiring IVF due to severe male factor, known pelvic adhesions, etc. * Couples with decreased male factor fertility rate (i.e., low sperm count or motility, i.e. less than 5 million/mL concentration on semen analysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ongoing Pregnancy Ratewithin 6 months of Sono HSG procedure8 week viable intrauterine pregnancy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural Related Pain Assessed by Visual Analog ScaleAfter sono hystersalpingography study infusion/procedure completedscale ranges from 0-10 with a higher score indicating more pain

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saline
Women in this arm will receive a flush with saline after normal saline Sono HSG. Saline: Up to 10cc of saline will be infused via intrauterine catheter
24
Lipiodol UF
Women in this arm will receive a flush with Lipiodol UF after normal saline Sono HSG. Lipiodol UF: Up to 10cc of Lipiodol Ultra Fluid will be infused via intrauterine catheter
24
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSalineLipiodol UFTotal
Age, Continuous29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
BMI30.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
31.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
31.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Multi-racial
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 241 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Ongoing Pregnancy Rate

8 week viable intrauterine pregnancy

Time frame: within 6 months of Sono HSG procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SalineOngoing Pregnancy Rate9 Participants
Lipiodol UFOngoing Pregnancy Rate4 Participants
p-value: 0.195% CI: [0.16, 1.25]Chi-squared
Secondary

Procedural Related Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale

scale ranges from 0-10 with a higher score indicating more pain

Time frame: After sono hystersalpingography study infusion/procedure completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SalineProcedural Related Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Lipiodol UFProcedural Related Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
p-value: 0.9695% CI: [-1.59, 1.68]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026