Skip to content

Evaluating the Impact of the National Health Insurance Scheme of Ghana on Surgical Care

Evaluating the Impact of Health Insurance on Financial Risk Protection for Surgical Care: an Analysis of Ghana' Insurance Scheme at Korlebu Teaching Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03604458
Enrollment
203
Registered
2018-07-27
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2017-11-12
Last updated
2018-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Surgery, Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

Universal Health Coverage, Surgery in resource limited settings

Brief summary

Ghana, a Low-Middle Income Country (LMIC) situated in the heart of West Africa started a national health insurance scheme in 2003.The scheme was designed to provide a comprehensive benefit package inclusive of surgical care and to protect against the need to pay out of pocket at the point of service. As of 2013, close to 40% of the population of Ghana was actively enrolled and ongoing plans to expand coverage by the government. This study tests the extent to which the national health insurance scheme of Ghana provides financial risk protection against catastrophic payments as a result of access to surgical care.

Detailed description

It is estimated that 11%-33% of the global burden of disease is attribute to surgical conditions. Yet, globally 3.7 billion people face financial catastrophe if surgical care is needed. Ghana, a country of 27 million people has a 14-year experience with a national health insurance scheme (NHIS) that provides coverage for 95% of the health conditions afflicting Ghanaians and includes access to surgical care. Despite much progress in providing Universal Health Coverage through NHIS, prior work shows that up to 18% of insured households make catastrophic health payments for routine care which is largely unaffordable for the poor. Particularly in Ghana where 1 out of 4 individuals live on less than 1.25 dollars per day. More importantly in 2015, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery called for national surgical plans that provide 100% coverage against catastrophic health expenditures as a result of seeking surgical care. The premise of Dr. Okoroh's GloCal project is to describe the surgical conditions that are included in the health insurance scheme and to evaluate whether insurance protect surgical patients against catastrophic health payments through a single institutional review at Korle-bu Teaching Hospital. With this work she hopes to develop a set of recommendations to the ministry of health and the national health insurance authority on how to improve health-care financing for surgical care in Ghana. Early results of our study show that NHIS provides coverage for most common surgical conditions including symptomatic hernia, breast cancer, and appendicitis. 70% of the total cost of surgical care was covered by NHIS, yet 56% of insured individuals made catastrophic payments for surgical care. Surgery is unaffordable as on average insured individuals spent close to 40% of their annual income on surgical care. Particularly the coverage of medicines, supplies, imaging, and other ancillary services are sparse which are necessary to the provision of surgical care. Our recommendations include; NHIS increasing the proportion of the total cost of surgical care covered for the poor and addressing the gaps in coverage of ancillary services. Further work includes understanding how households economically cope with making payments and the contribution of borrowing and other financing mechanisms in reducing the burden of cost. Our new study characterizes the cost of trauma care which is a major source of disability and injury for young adults in Ghana. Efforts are being made to engage policymakers on healthcare reform in Ghana.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
CollaboratorNIH
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
CollaboratorNIH
University of California Global Health Institute - UCGloCal Program
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Center for Surgery and Public Health
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
UC Global Health Institute
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients admitted to the general surgery ward between February 1st and October 1st 2017.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients treated on the subspecialty wards * Individuals less than 18 years of age. * If unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Out of Pocket Expenditure for Surgical CareDuring the hospitalization or episode of surgical care (respondents are interviewed prior to discharge from the hospital, on average less than two weeks)Out of pocket expenditure for surgical care is defined as all of the direct and indirect expenses incurred by an individual seeking surgical care at Korlebu Teaching Hospital during the study time period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Catastrophic Health Expenditure for Surgical CareDuring the hospitalization or episode of surgical care (respondents are interviewed prior to discharge from the hospital, on average less than two weeks)Catastrophic Health Expenditure for Surgical Care is defined as out of pocket expenditures which exceed 20% of the individual's income, 10% of the household expenditures, or 40% of net food expenditures

Countries

Ghana

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026