Skip to content

NEUWAVE Flex Microwave Ablation System in the Ablation of Primary Soft Tissue Lesions of the Lung

A Multicenter Study of the NEUWAVE Flex Microwave Ablation System in the Ablation of Medically Inoperable Primary Soft Tissue Lesions of the Lung: An Initial Experience

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03603652
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-07-27
Start date
2018-06-29
Completion date
2019-10-24
Last updated
2020-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of Lung, Cancer of the Lung, Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung, Lung Cancer, Neoplasms, Lung, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

Keywords

Lung Lesions; Soft Tissue- Lung

Brief summary

Patients with medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon using CT imaging. Prior to the ablation procedure, the treating physician will use endobronchial ultrasound to confirm staging. Patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety.

Detailed description

Patients with medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung (lesions less than or equal to 2cm and located in the outer two-thirds of the lung and not closer than 1cm to the pleura) will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed using CT imaging. All ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation procedure, the treating physician will use endobronchial ultrasound to confirm staging. Patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety with specific follow-up visits at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-ablation. A user experience questionnaire is completed by the treating physician to better understand the ease of the procedure.

Interventions

DEVICEMicrowave Ablation

Ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation, the treating physician will perform an endobronchial ultrasound to confirm disease staging.

Sponsors

Ethicon, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed informed consent. 2. Patients ≥ 18 years old. 3. Performance status 0-2 via ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) classification. 4. Willing to fulfill all follow-up visit requirements. 5. Medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung or patient election not to have surgery. (Medically inoperable is defined per the following indicators: post op predictive FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) \< 40%; DLCO (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide) \< 40%; hypoxemia or hypercapnia diabetes with end-organ damage; or severe cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular disease, or chronic heart disease) 6. One soft tissue lesion ≤ 2 cm in the outer two thirds of the lung and not closer than 1 cm to the pleura. (Outer two thirds of the lung is defined as peripheral beyond the segmental airway, past the segmental bronchi, such that proximal endobronchial soft tissue lesions are avoided; soft tissue lesions should not be contiguous with the pleura) 7. Radiographic resolution of pneumonia

Exclusion criteria

1. Scheduled concurrent procedure for the target soft tissue lesion other than those that are lung related. 2. Pregnant or breastfeeding. 3. Physical or psychological condition that would impair study participation. 4. Patients with uncorrectable coagulography at time of screening. 5. Patient with implantable devices, including pacemakers or other electronic implants. 6. Prior pneumonectomy or bronchiectasis. 7. Severe neuromuscular disease. 8. Platelet count ≤ 50,000/mm3. 9. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of ≥ 4. 10. Inability to tolerate anesthesia. 11. Expected survival less than 6 months. 12. Clinically significant hypertension. 13. Chronic ventilator support, which uses bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP). 14. Endobronchial soft tissue lesions proximal to the segmental airways

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
User Experience Survey (Part V)Immediately post-ablationA Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many times the probe had to be repositioned to complete the ablation procedure.
User Experience Survey (Part III)Immediately post-ablationA Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were taken to place the probe such that it was ready for ablation.
User Experience Survey (Part IV)Immediately post-ablationA Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the distance of the tip of the probe to the center of the soft-tissue lesion (in mm) just before the ablation procedure was initiated.
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical SuccessImmediately post-ablation (day 0)Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CBCT imaging, immediately following the procedure.
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy30 days post-ablationAblation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT imaging, 30 days (+/- 7 days) after the first ablation procedure.
User Experience Survey (Part I)Immediately post-ablationA Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. Questions were all YES/NO.
User Experience Survey (Part II)Immediately post-ablationA Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the time it took to place the probe in a position that was ready for ablation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the HospitalWithin 30 days post-ablationAny readmission to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure.
Number of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrencemeasured at 6 months and 1 year post-ablationAnalyzed at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Microwave Ablation
Each participant underwent microwave ablation to the original soft tissue lesion in the lung at single visit. The treating physician determined the ablation time and power used on a case-by-case basis.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMicrowave Ablation
Age, Continuous69.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.689
BMI26.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.469
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Radiation History
No, radiation history
9 Participants
Radiation History
Yes, radiation history
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Smoking Status
Current Smoker
3 Participants
Smoking Status
Former Smoker
6 Participants
Smoking Status
Non-Smoker
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success

Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CBCT imaging, immediately following the procedure.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation (day 0)

Population: All treated patients.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave AblationNumber of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success1010 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy

Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT imaging, 30 days (+/- 7 days) after the first ablation procedure.

Time frame: 30 days post-ablation

Population: Patients analyzed at 30 days post-ablation.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave AblationNumber of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy9 Participants
Primary

User Experience Survey (Part I)

A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. Questions were all YES/NO.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Probe through channel as expectedYES10 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Probe repositioned after first ablationYES6 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Ablation with NeuWave is predictableYES10 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Ablation with FLEX is simple to useYES10 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Success achieved similar to perc.YES10 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Locate probe/lesion with imagingYES10 Participants
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part I)Locate ablation zone createdYES7 Participants
Primary

User Experience Survey (Part II)

A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the time it took to place the probe in a position that was ready for ablation.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part II)18.2 MinutesStandard Deviation 11.25
Primary

User Experience Survey (Part III)

A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were taken to place the probe such that it was ready for ablation.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part III)4.4 Count of ScansStandard Deviation 3.44
Primary

User Experience Survey (Part IV)

A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the distance of the tip of the probe to the center of the soft-tissue lesion (in mm) just before the ablation procedure was initiated.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part IV)4.1 MillimetersStandard Deviation 2.23
Primary

User Experience Survey (Part V)

A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many times the probe had to be repositioned to complete the ablation procedure.

Time frame: Immediately post-ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Microwave AblationUser Experience Survey (Part V)0.9 Count of Probe RepositionsStandard Deviation 0.93
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrence

Analyzed at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging

Time frame: measured at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation

Population: Only 9 patients were analyzed at 6 months post-ablation as 1 patient passed away before the 6 month study visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave AblationNumber of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrence0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the Hospital

Any readmission to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure.

Time frame: Within 30 days post-ablation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave AblationNumber of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the Hospital1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026