Cancer of Lung, Cancer of the Lung, Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung, Lung Cancer, Neoplasms, Lung, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
Lung Lesions; Soft Tissue- Lung
Brief summary
Patients with medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon using CT imaging. Prior to the ablation procedure, the treating physician will use endobronchial ultrasound to confirm staging. Patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety.
Detailed description
Patients with medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung (lesions less than or equal to 2cm and located in the outer two-thirds of the lung and not closer than 1cm to the pleura) will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed using CT imaging. All ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation procedure, the treating physician will use endobronchial ultrasound to confirm staging. Patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety with specific follow-up visits at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-ablation. A user experience questionnaire is completed by the treating physician to better understand the ease of the procedure.
Interventions
Ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation, the treating physician will perform an endobronchial ultrasound to confirm disease staging.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Signed informed consent. 2. Patients ≥ 18 years old. 3. Performance status 0-2 via ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) classification. 4. Willing to fulfill all follow-up visit requirements. 5. Medically inoperable primary soft tissue lesion of the lung or patient election not to have surgery. (Medically inoperable is defined per the following indicators: post op predictive FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) \< 40%; DLCO (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide) \< 40%; hypoxemia or hypercapnia diabetes with end-organ damage; or severe cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular disease, or chronic heart disease) 6. One soft tissue lesion ≤ 2 cm in the outer two thirds of the lung and not closer than 1 cm to the pleura. (Outer two thirds of the lung is defined as peripheral beyond the segmental airway, past the segmental bronchi, such that proximal endobronchial soft tissue lesions are avoided; soft tissue lesions should not be contiguous with the pleura) 7. Radiographic resolution of pneumonia
Exclusion criteria
1. Scheduled concurrent procedure for the target soft tissue lesion other than those that are lung related. 2. Pregnant or breastfeeding. 3. Physical or psychological condition that would impair study participation. 4. Patients with uncorrectable coagulography at time of screening. 5. Patient with implantable devices, including pacemakers or other electronic implants. 6. Prior pneumonectomy or bronchiectasis. 7. Severe neuromuscular disease. 8. Platelet count ≤ 50,000/mm3. 9. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of ≥ 4. 10. Inability to tolerate anesthesia. 11. Expected survival less than 6 months. 12. Clinically significant hypertension. 13. Chronic ventilator support, which uses bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP). 14. Endobronchial soft tissue lesions proximal to the segmental airways
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| User Experience Survey (Part V) | Immediately post-ablation | A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many times the probe had to be repositioned to complete the ablation procedure. |
| User Experience Survey (Part III) | Immediately post-ablation | A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were taken to place the probe such that it was ready for ablation. |
| User Experience Survey (Part IV) | Immediately post-ablation | A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the distance of the tip of the probe to the center of the soft-tissue lesion (in mm) just before the ablation procedure was initiated. |
| Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success | Immediately post-ablation (day 0) | Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CBCT imaging, immediately following the procedure. |
| Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy | 30 days post-ablation | Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT imaging, 30 days (+/- 7 days) after the first ablation procedure. |
| User Experience Survey (Part I) | Immediately post-ablation | A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. Questions were all YES/NO. |
| User Experience Survey (Part II) | Immediately post-ablation | A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the time it took to place the probe in a position that was ready for ablation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the Hospital | Within 30 days post-ablation | Any readmission to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure. |
| Number of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrence | measured at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation | Analyzed at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation Each participant underwent microwave ablation to the original soft tissue lesion in the lung at single visit. The treating physician determined the ablation time and power used on a case-by-case basis. | 10 |
| Total | 10 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Microwave Ablation |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.689 |
| BMI | 26.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.469 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 9 Participants |
| Radiation History No, radiation history | 9 Participants |
| Radiation History Yes, radiation history | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants |
| Smoking Status Current Smoker | 3 Participants |
| Smoking Status Former Smoker | 6 Participants |
| Smoking Status Non-Smoker | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 10 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success
Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CBCT imaging, immediately following the procedure.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation (day 0)
Population: All treated patients.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success | 10 | 10 Participants |
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy
Ablation of the target lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT imaging, 30 days (+/- 7 days) after the first ablation procedure.
Time frame: 30 days post-ablation
Population: Patients analyzed at 30 days post-ablation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy | 9 Participants |
User Experience Survey (Part I)
A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. Questions were all YES/NO.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Probe through channel as expected | YES | 10 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Probe repositioned after first ablation | YES | 6 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Ablation with NeuWave is predictable | YES | 10 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Ablation with FLEX is simple to use | YES | 10 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Success achieved similar to perc. | YES | 10 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Locate probe/lesion with imaging | YES | 10 Participants |
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part I) | Locate ablation zone created | YES | 7 Participants |
User Experience Survey (Part II)
A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the time it took to place the probe in a position that was ready for ablation.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part II) | 18.2 Minutes | Standard Deviation 11.25 |
User Experience Survey (Part III)
A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were taken to place the probe such that it was ready for ablation.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part III) | 4.4 Count of Scans | Standard Deviation 3.44 |
User Experience Survey (Part IV)
A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked the distance of the tip of the probe to the center of the soft-tissue lesion (in mm) just before the ablation procedure was initiated.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part IV) | 4.1 Millimeters | Standard Deviation 2.23 |
User Experience Survey (Part V)
A Sponsor-created survey completed by the treating physician immediately post-ablation. This question asked how many times the probe had to be repositioned to complete the ablation procedure.
Time frame: Immediately post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | User Experience Survey (Part V) | 0.9 Count of Probe Repositions | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
Number of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrence
Analyzed at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging
Time frame: measured at 6 months and 1 year post-ablation
Population: Only 9 patients were analyzed at 6 months post-ablation as 1 patient passed away before the 6 month study visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Number of Patients Who Experienced Target Lesion Recurrence | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the Hospital
Any readmission to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure.
Time frame: Within 30 days post-ablation
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Number of Patients Who Were Readmitted to the Hospital | 1 Participants |