Skip to content

Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring Versus 14-day Continuous ECG Patch Monitoring EZYPRO

Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring Versus 14-day Continuous ECG Patch Monitoring EZYPRO

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03602742
Enrollment
150
Registered
2018-07-27
Start date
2018-03-16
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2018-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, EZYPRO ECG Recorder, ECG monitor, Long term ECG monitor, 14-day ECG monitor

Brief summary

This is an open-label study to investigate the functional features of prolonged monitoring by 14-day EZYPRO® to improve the medical care and/or diagnosis for the patient with arrhythmia. Patients will be enrolled by outpatient basis from two clinical study sites. Enrolled patients will wear a traditional 24-hour Holter monitor and an 14-day EZYPRO® which can provide monitoring data for up to 14 days. This study will allow a direct comparison between two devices.

Interventions

DEVICEEZYPRO®

Wear two devices including 24-hour Holter and 14-day continuous EZYPRO® to evaluate the performance

Sponsors

Sigknow Biomedical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provision of signed written informed consent before enrollment into the study * Are able to communicate with the investigators * With suspected arrhythmia related signs and symptoms, judged by the investigators * Patients intend to wear ECG moniotrs * Males and females, 20 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with skin allergies or injury, judged by investigators * Patients with specific arrhythmia or specific treatments, interfere with study evaluations, judged by investigators * Pregnant women * Currently participating in another trial or who participated in a previous clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the detection difference of any type of arrhythmia between 14-day continuous ECG patch and 24-hour Holter monitor device among patients with suspected cardiac arrhythmia events over total wearing timeUp to14 daysThe arrhythmia events of 14-day continuous ECG patch monitor (investigational device) and 24-hour Holter monitor will be analyzed by the qualified ECG technicians and determined by physician investigators at the study sites. Arrhythmia events are defined as detection of any 1 of 6 arrhythmias, including: * Supraventricular tachycardia (\>4 beats, not including atrial fibrillation or flutter) * Atrial fibrillation/flutter (\>4 beats) * Pause \>3 seconds * Atrioventricular block (Second-degree, 2:1 or third-degree atrioventricular block, need an advanced determination by the investigators) * Ventricular tachycardia (\>4 beats) * Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation In the end, all the detection will be confirmed by the investigators. McNemar's tests will be used to compare the matched pairs of proportion data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The wearing time of 14-day continuous ECG patch (Study Compliance)Up to14 daysThe wearing time will be recorded as the day of 14-day continuous ECG patch removal after stating monitoring. Kaplan-Meier method will be reported for total wearing time. The mean value along with two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be report as well.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactSigknow Biomedical Co., LTD
ethan.kao@sigknow.com.tw+886 2 27612577
Backup ContactSigknow Biomedical Co., LTD
casey.feng@sigknow.com.tw+886 2 27612577

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026