Skip to content

Pediatric Intubation During Emergency Conditions

A Comparison of Direct vs. Video-laryngoscopes for Different Emergency Pediatric Airway Scenarios

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03602183
Enrollment
83
Registered
2018-07-26
Start date
2018-07-27
Completion date
2019-07-20
Last updated
2019-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation, Pediatric, Cardiac Arrest, Injuries

Keywords

difficult airway, endotracheal intubation, chest compression, physician

Brief summary

The effectiveness of endotracheal intubation in pre-hospital conditions is insufficient - especially in the context of pediatric patients. Anatomical differences in pediatric patients compared to adults: a relative larger tongue, a larger and more flabby epiglottis - located more cephalously - that make intubation is more difficult than for adults. Also, higher oxygen metabolism requires the immediate response of medical personnel to children in case of need to protect the airways and support breath.

Interventions

DEVICEMacintosh laryngoscope

intubation will be performed using standard direct laryngoscopy - Macintosh laryngoscope

intubation will be performed using Miller laryngoscope

DEVICEMcGrath MAC EMS

intubation will be performed using McGrath MAC EMS video - laryngoscope

DEVICEGlideScope

intubation will be performed using GlideScope video - laryngoscope

Sponsors

Wroclaw Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Vienna
CollaboratorOTHER
Lazarski University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* paramedics * give voluntary consent to participate in the study * none experience in videolaryngoscopy * less than 1 year experience in medicine

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation time1 daytime in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of intubation1 dayIf the oesopharyngeal tube was incorrectly placed or intubation lasted longer than 60 seconds, the airway-management attempt was defined as a failure.
Cormack-Lehane grading1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading, scale developed by Cormack and Lehane, based on four degrees of visibility of the glottis.
POGO score - percentage of glottic opening1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization. A 100% POGO score is a full view of the glottis from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0 means that even the interarytenoid notch is not seen.
Preferred ETI device1 dayparticipants were asked which method of ETI they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Ease of use1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization. A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure. A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026