Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With GCA

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03600805
Enrollment
83
Registered
2018-07-26
Start date
2018-11-20
Completion date
2020-11-24
Last updated
2022-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Arteritis

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course. Secondary Objective: * To demonstrate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with GCA compared to placebo, in combination with CS taper with regards to: * Clinical responses (such as responses based on disease remission rates, time to first disease flare) over time. * Cumulative CS (including prednisone) exposure. * To assess the safety (including immunogenicity) and tolerability of sarilumab in participants with GCA. * To measure sarilumab serum concentrations in participants with GCA. * To assess the effect of sarilumab on sparing glucocorticoid toxicity as measured by glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI).

Detailed description

Study duration per participant was approximately 82 weeks, including an up to 6-week screening period, 52-week treatment period, and 24-week follow-up period.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous

DRUGSarilumab matching placebo

Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous

DRUGPrednisone

Pharmaceutical form: tablets or capsules Route of administration: oral administration

DRUGPrednisone matching placebo

Pharmaceutical form: capsules Route of administration: oral administration

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Diagnosis of GCA according to European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. * New onset active disease or refractory active disease. * At least one of the symptoms of GCA within 6 weeks of baseline. * Either erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 millimeter per hour or C-reactive protein \>=10 mg per liter within 6 weeks of baseline. * Received or were able to receive prednisone 20-60 mg/day for the treatment of active GCA.

Exclusion criteria

* Organ transplantation recipient (except corneas, unless it is within 3 months prior to baseline visit). * Major ischemic event, unrelated to GCA, within 12 weeks of screening. * Any prior use of the following therapies, for the treatment of GCA: * Janus kinase inhibitor (e.g., tofacitinib) within 4 weeks of baseline. * Cell-depletion agents (e.g., anti CD20) without evidence of recovery of B cells to baseline level. * Abatacept within 8 weeks of baseline. * Anakinra within 1 week of baseline. * Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors within 2-8 weeks (etanercept within 2 weeks; infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, or adalimumab within 8 weeks), or less than at least 5 half-lives had elapsed prior to baseline, whichever was longer. * Therapeutic failure, including inadequate response or intolerance, or contraindication, to biological Interleukin 6 (IL-6) IL-6/(R) antagonist (prior experience with IL-6/(R) antagonist that was terminated for reasons unrelated to therapeutic failure at least 3 months before baseline was not exclusionary). * Use of any alkylating agents including cyclophosphamide within 6 months of baseline. * Use of immunosuppressant, such as hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or leflunomide within 4 weeks of baseline. (Use of methotrexate (MTX) not exceeding 25 mg per week and had been stable for at least 3 months prior to baseline was not exclusionary). * Concurrent use of systemic CS for conditions other than GCA. * Use of intervascular CS at a dose equivalent to 100 mg of methylprednisolone or higher within 8 weeks of baseline for GCA therapy. * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman. * Participants with active or untreated latent tuberculosis. * Participants with history of invasive opportunistic infections. * Participants with fever associated with infection or chronic, persistent or recurring infections requiring active treatment. * Participants with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. * Participants with non-healed or healing skin ulcers. * Participants who received any live, attenuated vaccine within 3 months of baseline. * Participants who are positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and/or HIV. * Participants with a history of active or recurrent herpes zoster. * Participants with a history of or prior articular or prosthetic joint infection. * Prior or current history of malignancy. * Participants who have had surgery within 4 weeks of screening or planned surgery during study. * Participants with a history of inflammatory bowel disease or severe diverticulitis or previous gastrointestinal perforation.. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52At Week 52Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of giant cell arteries (GCA), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) (\<10 mg/L). Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in corticosteroid \[CS\] dose due to GCA or elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\] attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 52, normalization of CRP (to \<10 mg/L, with absence of successive elevations to \>=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 24At Week 24Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP \<10 mg/L. Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 24, normalization of CRP (to \<10 mg/L, with an absence of successive elevations to \>=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 24, and successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis SetFrom Week 12 through Week 52Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 52 were reported.
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT PopulationFrom Week 12 through Week 24Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 24 were reported.
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis SetFrom Week 12 through Week 52Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels \<10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP \>=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT PopulationFrom Week 12 through Week 24Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels \<10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP \>=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis SetFrom Week 12 through Week 52Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 52 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of \<=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage adverse event (AE) not related to GCA.
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT PopulationFrom Week 12 through Week 24Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 24 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of \<=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage AE not related to GCA.
Total Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) DoseUp to Week 52Cumulative dose of CS used for GCA disease was defined as the dose taken up to the end of treatment, including expected prednisone in tapering regimen per protocol, CS used in rescue therapy and the use of commercial prednisone (an excess of \<=100 mg of prednisone during the study treatment period employed to manage AE not related to GCA). The total cumulative CS dose was based on the total number of days with complete or partial intake, no imputation was done on missed tablets.
Time to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease FlareUp to Week 52Time to first GCA flare was defined as the duration (in days) from randomization to first GCA flare after clinical remission (defined as resolution of signs and symptoms and normalization of CRP \[\<10 mg/L\]) and up to 52 weeks. Disease flare was defined as either the recurrence of signs or symptoms attributable to active plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Participants who never achieved remission were censored at randomization day; and those who achieved clinical remission and never flared were censored at the end of treatment assessment date up to Week 52.
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationAt Week 24GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure (OM). CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis SetUp to Week 12Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (\< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (\<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was \<10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue corticosteroid (CS) due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose (i.e., Day 1) up to 60 days after last dose (i.e., up to Week 60)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to the last dose of the SC IMP +60 days).
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabPre-dose on Week 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24 and 52Ctrough was pre dose concentration of drug. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arms (Placebo+52 Week Taper and Placebo+26 Week Taper) as pre-specified in the protocol.
Pharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 24post-dose at Week 24Serum concentrations of functional sarilumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseFrom Day 1 (Baseline) up to last dose date of study drug + 60 days (i.e., up to Week 60)ADA response categories: 1) Treatment-boosted ADA positive participant: Participant with a positive ADA assay response at Baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to Baseline during TEAE period. 2) Treatment-emergent ADA positive participant: Participant with non-positive assay (meaning negative or missing) response at Baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the IMP to the last dose of the SC IMP + 60 days). Titer values were categorized as low (titer \<1,000); moderate (1,000\<= titer \<=10,000) and high (titer \>10,000).
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52ESR is a laboratory test to provide non-specific measure of inflammation in the body. The test assessed the rate at which red blood cells fell in a test tube and was measured in millimeters per hour.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52CRP is a protein made by the liver. CRP levels increase in blood when inflammation occurs in the body.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic. sIL-6R is one of the receptors that bind IL-6.
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52At Week 52GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 52 are reported in this OM. CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) PopulationUp to Week 12Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (\< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (\<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was \<10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue CS due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 48 active centers in 19 countries. A total of 125 participants were screened between 20 November 2018 and 19 March 2020, of whom 42 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting inclusion criteria. A total of 83 participants were enrolled and randomized in the study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized to 4 treatments arms in 2:1:1:2 ratio by interactive response technology stratified by starting dose of prednisone at Baseline (less than \[\<\] 30 milligrams per day (mg/day) or greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 mg/day).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo+52 Week Taper
Participants received sarilumab-matching placebo as subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (q2w) up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone/prednisone-matching placebo tapering oral daily doses for 52 weeks.
28
Placebo+26 Week Taper
Participants received sarilumab-matching placebo as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
14
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper
Participants received sarilumab 150 mg as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
14
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper
Participants received sarilumab 200 mg as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
27
Total Title83
Total166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2117
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2100
Overall StudyOther unspecified146711
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo+52 Week TaperTotal TitleSarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperSarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPlacebo+26 Week Taper
Age, Continuous71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
71.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
73.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants10 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants72 Participants25 Participants11 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants67 Participants23 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants16 Participants4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 281 / 140 / 142 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 2813 / 1413 / 1420 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 283 / 142 / 147 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 24

Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP \<10 mg/L. Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 24, normalization of CRP (to \<10 mg/L, with an absence of successive elevations to \>=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 24, and successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) population that included participants who were allocated to a randomized treatment regardless of whether the treatment kit was used, and were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo+52 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 2439.3 percentage of participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 247.1 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 2442.9 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 2448.1 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52

Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of giant cell arteries (GCA), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) (\<10 mg/L). Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in corticosteroid \[CS\] dose due to GCA or elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\] attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 52, normalization of CRP (to \<10 mg/L, with absence of successive elevations to \>=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set population that included randomized participants who had opportunity to complete the 52-week treatment period (randomized prior to October 16th, 2019).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo+52 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 5230.0 percentage of participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 520 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 5242.9 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 5246.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT Population

GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure (OM). CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationCumulative worsening score29.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.8
Placebo+52 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationAggregate improvement score-21.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.8
Placebo+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationAggregate improvement score-13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationCumulative worsening score30.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationCumulative worsening score55.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.1
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationAggregate improvement score14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationCumulative worsening score31.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.9
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT PopulationAggregate improvement score-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.4
Secondary

Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52

GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 52 are reported in this OM. CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Aggregate improvement score-19.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 65
Placebo+52 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Cumulative worsening score73.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Aggregate improvement score31.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.7
Placebo+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Cumulative worsening score84.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.4
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Cumulative worsening score77.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.7
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Aggregate improvement score23.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.9
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Cumulative worsening score52.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperComposite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52Aggregate improvement score-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.5
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 24 were reported.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population21 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population7 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population10 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 52 were reported.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set7 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set3 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set4 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population

Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (\< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (\<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was \<10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue CS due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population16 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population6 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population9 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set

Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (\< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (\<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was \<10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue corticosteroid (CS) due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set7 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set3 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set4 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels \<10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP \>=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population20 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population4 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population11 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels \<10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP \>=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set6 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set3 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set5 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 24 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of \<=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage AE not related to GCA.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population18 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population5 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population7 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 52 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of \<=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage adverse event (AE) not related to GCA.

Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on Week 52 analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set6 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set2 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set3 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to the last dose of the SC IMP +60 days).

Time frame: From first dose (i.e., Day 1) up to 60 days after last dose (i.e., up to Week 60)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population that included participants who had received at least one dose or part of a dose of IMP and were analyzed according to the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE2 Participants
Placebo+52 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAE24 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAE14 Participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE3 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE2 Participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAE13 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE7 Participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAE22 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response

ADA response categories: 1) Treatment-boosted ADA positive participant: Participant with a positive ADA assay response at Baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to Baseline during TEAE period. 2) Treatment-emergent ADA positive participant: Participant with non-positive assay (meaning negative or missing) response at Baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the IMP to the last dose of the SC IMP + 60 days). Titer values were categorized as low (titer \<1,000); moderate (1,000\<= titer \<=10,000) and high (titer \>10,000).

Time frame: From Day 1 (Baseline) up to last dose date of study drug + 60 days (i.e., up to Week 60)

Population: Analysis was performed on ADA population that included participants who had received at least one dose or part of a dose of IMP, were analyzed according to the treatment actually received and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result in the ADA assay following the first dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo+52 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-boosted ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Placebo+52 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-emergent ADA positive participants3.8 percentage of participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-emergent ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Placebo+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-boosted ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-boosted ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-emergent ADA positive participants7.1 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-boosted ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseTreatment-emergent ADA positive participants0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

CRP is a protein made by the liver. CRP levels increase in blood when inflammation occurs in the body.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline10.9 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 20
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-4.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-4.1 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20.4 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 21
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-4.5 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 21.1
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-4.4 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 22
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-3.6 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 19.3
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 528.2 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 27.4
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-1.9 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 22.3
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-4.5 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 20.7
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-5.2 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 19.6
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 165.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 23.9
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 321.1 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 35.4
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 200.6 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 17.6
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 240.3 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 32.6
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-2.2 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 21.8
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-13.8 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 37
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-0.9 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 17
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-9.2 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 27
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 124.4 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 18.9
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-1.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 21.2
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline9.7 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 18.3
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-2.2 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 11.1
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline10.1 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 12.4
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-3.5 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 11.2
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-2.6 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 18.7
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-3.5 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 11.7
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-3.3 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 17.9
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-5.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 14.1
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-4.9 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 13.6
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-3.1 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 18.3
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-5.8 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 17.1
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-4.5 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 5.2
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-1.8 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 3
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-4.6 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 4.4
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-0.4 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 6.5
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-1.1 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 8.4
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-1.7 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 5.5
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-1.9 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 8.3
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-2.8 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 3.5
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-2.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 7.6
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline3.7 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 6.2
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-1.0 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 4.5
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-1.6 milligrams per literStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

ESR is a laboratory test to provide non-specific measure of inflammation in the body. The test assessed the rate at which red blood cells fell in a test tube and was measured in millimeters per hour.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline29.3 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 27.3
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-2.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22.7
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-4.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-1.1 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 17.9
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-6.6 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 23.7
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-1.5 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 24.9
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-4.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 21.4
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-1.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 27
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-1.5 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22.3
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-4.1 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22.7
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-7.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 21.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 169.8 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.5
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 326.6 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.2
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 208.8 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 14.6
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2413.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.1
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 45.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 19.7
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-1.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12.4
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 810.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12.6
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 404.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 18.1
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 129.8 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 13.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20.7 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 11.4
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline21.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.2
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-10.1 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 25.2
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline24.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-10.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.4
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-13.3 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 22.6
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-11.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 18.9
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-14.7 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 19.2
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-13.5 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 18.1
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-18.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 23.5
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-16.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 25.6
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-9.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 18
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-15.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 19
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 16-10.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12.7
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 52-7.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 32-7.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 10.6
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 12-11.0 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 14.1
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 8-8.7 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.1
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 4-9.4 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 15.2
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 40-7.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 8.6
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 2-8.8 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12.4
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Baseline18.2 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 16.8
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 24-9.3 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 11.5
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52Week 20-10.9 millimeters per hourStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline10.91 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 12.85
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 22.90 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 17.46
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 24-1.03 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 7.15
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 12-0.88 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 12.6
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 520.43 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 5.58
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 522.82 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline8.74 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 5.78
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 23.47 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 10.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 245.57 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 19.81
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 125.56 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 8.08
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline11.03 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 15.33
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 2453.60 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 53.71
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 5242.14 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 8.52
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 231.74 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 31.13
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 1252.38 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 47.46
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 2117.33 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 245.28
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline7.71 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 7.3
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 1281.82 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 50.85
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 2469.20 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 46.89
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 5233.28 nanograms per LiterStandard Deviation 32.37
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic. sIL-6R is one of the receptors that bind IL-6.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

Population: Analyzed on safety population. Here, 'Number Analyzed'=participants with available data for each specified category and '0' in number analyzed field signifies that no participants were available for assessments at specified time points in the respective arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 1217.67 nanograms per milliliter
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 52-131.47 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 356.65
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 24-12.72 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.97
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline136.63 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 260.57
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline54.80 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.48
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 52-9.69 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.14
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 24311.88 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 184.32
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 52377.23 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 84.99
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline50.05 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.84
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 12336.30 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 107.49
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 2212.19 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 51.99
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 52471.16 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 182.72
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Baseline61.37 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 72.43
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 2224.87 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 107.43
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 12427.40 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 124.97
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52Week 24456.09 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 118.07
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Sarilumab

Ctrough was pre dose concentration of drug. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arms (Placebo+52 Week Taper and Placebo+26 Week Taper) as pre-specified in the protocol.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Week 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24 and 52

Population: Analyzed on PK analysis population: participants who had received at least one dose or part of a dose of IMP, were analyzed according to the treatment actually received and had at least 1 post-dose non-missing serum sarilumab concentration value. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 5219780.00 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 21829.95
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabBaseline0.00 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 128371.33 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7608.42
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 22099.29 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3114.92
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 2412926.67 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 9509.92
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 44644.71 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5994.17
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 168111.08 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5962.56
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 5246766.67 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 21172.15
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 1227586.00 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 17496.07
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 1628911.88 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 20821.06
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 2435451.74 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 23953.29
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabBaseline0.00 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 25400.82 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 4124.63
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of SarilumabWeek 411640.98 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8574
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 24

Serum concentrations of functional sarilumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

Time frame: post-dose at Week 24

Population: Analysis was performed on PK analysis population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arms (Placebo+52 Week Taper and Placebo+26 Week Taper) as pre-specified in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperPharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 2425255.45 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 17510.38
Placebo+26 Week TaperPharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 2444551.54 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 28298.62
Secondary

Time to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease Flare

Time to first GCA flare was defined as the duration (in days) from randomization to first GCA flare after clinical remission (defined as resolution of signs and symptoms and normalization of CRP \[\<10 mg/L\]) and up to 52 weeks. Disease flare was defined as either the recurrence of signs or symptoms attributable to active plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Participants who never achieved remission were censored at randomization day; and those who achieved clinical remission and never flared were censored at the end of treatment assessment date up to Week 52.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo+52 Week TaperTime to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease FlareNA days
Placebo+26 Week TaperTime to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease Flare170.00 days
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperTime to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease FlareNA days
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperTime to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease FlareNA days
Secondary

Total Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose

Cumulative dose of CS used for GCA disease was defined as the dose taken up to the end of treatment, including expected prednisone in tapering regimen per protocol, CS used in rescue therapy and the use of commercial prednisone (an excess of \<=100 mg of prednisone during the study treatment period employed to manage AE not related to GCA). The total cumulative CS dose was based on the total number of days with complete or partial intake, no imputation was done on missed tablets.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo+52 Week TaperTotal Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose2577.3 milligramsStandard Deviation 1018.3
Placebo+26 Week TaperTotal Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose2270.7 milligramsStandard Deviation 1418
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperTotal Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose2177.1 milligramsStandard Deviation 1326.7
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperTotal Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose1643.1 milligramsStandard Deviation 967.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026