Humerus Fracture, Humerus, Shoulder Fractures, Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions, Arthropathy Shoulder, Shoulder Injury, Arthropathy
Conditions
Brief summary
There is currently no consensus amongst orthopedic specialists on the best way to treat 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. No surgery and surgery with a type of shoulder replacement called a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are two options that many orthopedists use. This study is being performed to evaluate the differences in short- and long-term pain and functional outcomes between patients who are treated with these two different options.
Interventions
Surgical management will include placement of fracture specific, cemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty components as per standard surgical care and routine postoperative rehabilitation.
Subjects allocated to the nonoperative treatment arm will maintain sling immobilization for 3 weeks. The sling will be removed for elbow, wrist and hand range of motion (ROM), hygiene, and dressing only. At 3 weeks passive ROM in external rotation (ER) and forward elevation (FE) will be added. At 6 weeks from injury, the sling will be removed and stretching in all planes will be allowed. Use of the arm will be up to a fork/knife/toothbrush only. At 3 months from injury, strengthening will be added. Supervised physical therapy will be offered to patients for use at their discretion, as is current practice.
Sponsors
Mayo Clinic
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. * Age greater than or equal to 65 years old.
Exclusion criteria
* Less than 65 years old. * Medical comorbidities precluding surgical treatment or anesthesia * Dementia or inability to provide adequate follow up. * Pathologic fractures * Open fractures * Associated injuries: fracture dislocations, multiple or complex injuries of the ipsilateral limb, complete brachial plexopathy, vascular injury and polytrauma.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Function as described by ASES score at 1 year follow-up. | 2 year follow-up | The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is a well-validated, patient-reported outcome measure used by shoulder and elbow surgeons. The score ranges from 0-100 with 100 signifying the best outcome. Half of the score correlates to pain and half to function, both on a 0-50 scale where higher is again considered a better outcome. The pain portion is tabulated by taking the patient's response on a visual analogue scale (0 to 10 scale where 0 represent no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable), subtracting it from 10, and then multiplying by 5. The function score is tabulated by taking the patient's response on 10 questions rated on an ordinal scale from 0-3 and then multiplying the cumulative score by 5/3. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed