Skip to content

Impact of Formative OSCE on Students' Summative Clinical Performance

Impact of Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on Students' Summative Clinical Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03599232
Acronym
OSCE
Enrollment
119
Registered
2018-07-26
Start date
2016-09-17
Completion date
2017-05-20
Last updated
2018-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Performance, Objective Structured Clinical Examination

Keywords

formative assessment, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), Iraq, impact, feedback

Brief summary

Assessment is now seen as a learning experience. there is little literature on objective structured clinical examination role for formative assessment especially in developing world Many studies showed that formative-OSCE contributes positively to final summative examination performance though most studies address this point through the students' perception toward the formative-OSCE. Having research that evaluates the effect of formative-OSCE introduction on a subsequent summative-OSCE in randomised controlled design may be of benefit for institutions considering the establishment of their own formative-OSCEs particularly in low resource countries.

Detailed description

Formative assessments are systematically designed instructional interventions to assess and provide feedback on students' strengths and weaknesses in the course of teaching and learning and educational experts recommend its use in addition to summative assessment. Moreover, it is a requirement in undergraduate medical education and must be at the heart of student training not just included to satisfy accreditation requirement, yet unlike other professional training culture such as music in which feedback is expected, respected and given regularly to all learners, the investigators haven't cultivated a true feedback culture in medical education. In a performance-based assessment, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has gained importance because of its reliability and could be in a summative or formative manner to measure clinical competence. Clinical skills development requires time and practice at a rate that can accelerated by feedback to optimize experiential learning and improve future performance for which a learner should enter a reflection period during which available feedback is examined. There are some medical schools where formative assessments are institutionalized and carried out systematically, unfortunately, this kind of assessment is not very frequent in Mediterranean countries. Undergraduate medical education in Iraq is currently going through a transitional period. The Medical college of Hawler medical university (HMU) which provides a 6-year MBChB program, has started the process of changing its curriculum to competency-based medical education (CBME) and formative assessment is a requirement in this process. In the traditional curriculum training in pediatric is introduced in 5th year with summative assessment composed of 50% written test, 30% OSCE, 10% logbook, 10% history taking skills. Students should be competent to record case history, examine children, make a provisional diagnosis, interpret investigations and communicate with children and their families given that at the allotted time end, students present the case findings and evaluated by the faculty. However, a faculty member doesn't actively observe the students' actual performance of these skills or competencies so the purpose of formative assessment is not fully met. Use of OSCE as formative assessment can overcome this problem. Attempts have been made in OSCE implementation for summative assessment, however, formative-OSCEs introduction and evaluation in Iraqi medical colleges is lacking. Iraqi medical schools are facing challenges in staff recruitment and adequate resource provision. The latter is one of the numerous concerns and challenges to the CBME implementation. Many studies showed that formative-OSCE contributes positively to final summative examination performance though most studies address this point through the students' perception toward the formative-OSCE.

Interventions

OTHERFormative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)

Sponsors

Hawler Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The staff who participated in the summative-OSCE(outcome assessor) were unaware of the group assignment and the two-teaching staff who participated in the intervention (Formative-OSCE) did not participate in the summative exam.

Intervention model description

Students in the intervention group (first-arm) attended a formative-OSCE on the first day of their pediatric module to assess the competencies they gained from previous modules. The formative-OSCE design involved a blueprint development which served as a guideline for the development and face-validation of the 8 stations, which were both interactive and static. The formative-OSCE examiners consisted of 2 teaching staff and 11 postgraduate pediatric board trainees, who were trained by the researcher using role model and audiovisual aids. The formative-OSCE was carried out following the exact same process of the summative-OSCE. It composed of stations assessing same competencies with standardized mark sheets and feedback. Students received feedback on their performance in the formative-OSCE on the day the results were released on a one-to-one basis. at the end of pediatric module both groups undergo summative OSCEassessment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 5th-year students of both gender

Exclusion criteria

* students who did not fulfill the 4th year requirements. * absent on the day of performing formative OSCE * did not agree to participate in formative OSCE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
performance in a summative OSCE test ( OSCE scores)after 7 weeks from formative OSCE assessmentThe randomized groups of students with and without formative OSCE were compared on mean summative OSCE score they obtained at the end of pediatric module

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
student feedback on formative OSCEafter completing the summative OSCE ( 7weeks after formative OSCE)measure students' agreement on Likert scale-based questionnaire(a scale used to represent people's attitudes to a topic.) regarding their experience in formative-OSCE (distributed to students of intervention group) the format of the scale was composed of 5 level likert items ( 5 indicating strongly agree where as 1 indicating strongly disagree) 1. Strongly disagree (minimum) 2. Disagree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree ( maximum) the percentage of student who tick agree and strongly agree were summed to indicate student agreement on each statement in the questionnaire

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026