Skip to content

Assessing the Effect of a Blood-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test on Screening Adherence and Colonoscopy Completion

Assessing the Effect of Offering a Blood-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test on Screening Adherence and Colonoscopy Completion in Patients Who Have Refused Colonoscopy and FIT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03598166
Enrollment
359
Registered
2018-07-26
Start date
2018-10-11
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

colorectal cancer screening, septin 9

Brief summary

Objectives: Colonoscopy and stool-based testing are the two predominant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests used in the US, and both reduce colorectal cancer mortality. However, only 62% of Americans are up to date with screening, partly because many individuals find these two tests inconvenient or unacceptable for a variety of reasons. There is an unmet need for a non-invasive test that does not require bowel preparation or handling stool, and the Septin9 DNA blood test may be an alternative for those individuals who would otherwise remain unscreened. Aims: Aim 1: To measure screening uptake with a blood test in screen-resistant patients who have declined both colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) at the Manhattan VA Medical Center * Sub-Aim 1a: To assess the proportion of those with a positive blood-based screening test who undergo diagnostic colonoscopy * Sub-Aim 1b: To describe the endoscopic findings on diagnostic colonoscopy Aim 2: To survey screen-resistant patients to understand their beliefs and attitudes about colorectal cancer screening and testing options We hypothesize that a substantial proportion of patients who have refused colonoscopy and FIT will accept the blood test. We hypothesize this will be driven by the convenience of the blood test. Methods: This will be randomized controlled trial of individuals who have refused colonoscopy and FIT within past 6 months. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. Both groups will be invited to participate in navigated colonoscopy or FIT by letter and telephone call. The intervention group will also be invited to participate in the blood test if they refuse colonoscopy and FIT. We will enroll 180 participants in each group (total n=360).

Detailed description

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial that will 1) assess the uptake of a CRC screening blood test among patients who have declined both colonoscopy and FIT in the previous 6 months, including diagnostic evaluation of positive results and 2) survey patients about their beliefs and attitudes regarding CRC screening and testing options. All participants will be primary care patients at the Manhattan VA Medical Center. Based on a recent internal audit, there were 1502 patients who had at least one primary care visit from August 2016 through August 2017 and were not up to date with CRC screening. Up-to-date CRC screening is defined as either 1) a colonoscopy within the past 10 years or 2) FIT within the past year. We will perform an updated CRC screening audit at the beginning of the study to obtain the entire pool of eligible patients who are not up to date with screening. Eligible patients will then be randomized 1:1 to either an intervention group or a control group. All patients will receive a letter noting that they are not up-to-date on screening and encouraging them to contact a study number if they choose to screen with colonoscopy or FIT. Patients who call will speak to a research assistant who is trained in patient navigation and can facilitate referrals for colonoscopy or FIT. Following the sequential testing approach, letters addressed to the intervention group will also include an option to participate in the blood test, with instructions to call the study number to schedule the blood draw. In addition to the letter, both groups will also receive a follow-up telephone call that reiterates information in the letter. The research assistant will make and receive all calls using a standard script. All patients will also be asked to complete a survey about their beliefs and attitudes regarding CRC screening. The survey will be mailed with the invitation letter and will also be administered over the telephone by the research assistant. The study team will notify patients and their primary care physicians of blood test results and will facilitate a colonoscopy referral for those with positive tests. Primary care physicians will not be asked to notify the patients or make the colonoscopy referral because most will not have adequate knowledge of the Septin9 test to provide appropriate patient education. Participants who are randomized to the blood test arm will undergo phlebotomy, which will be performed by the study research assistant. The blood sample will be temporarily stored on-site and then transported to an off-site commercial laboratory (Lenco Diagnostic Laboratory, Brooklyn, NY) to run the assay. Clinical outcomes for both the intervention and control group participants will be measured as a secondary outcome. This includes timing and result of a screening colonoscopy or FIT for individuals in the controls group as well as diagnostic colonoscopy for participants who had a positive blood test.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSeptin9

Septin9 is a FDA-approved blood test for colorectal cancer screening

Sponsors

Peter S. Liang, MD MPH
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening, defined as a colonoscopy in the past 10 years, a stool test (FOBT/FIT) in the past year, or a flexible sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years. * Declined colorectal cancer screening (both colonoscopy and FIT) in the previous 6 months, which must be documented in the electronic health record

Exclusion criteria

* Personal history of colonic adenomas (including sessile serrated adenomas), proximal hyperplastic polyps, CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndrome * First degree relative with CRC diagnosed at \<60 years of age; family history of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. * Vulnerable populations * Adult unable to consent * Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) * Pregnant women * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach6 monthsPercentage of participants who undergo screening in the intervention group vs. control group, measured 6 months after the initial letter was sent

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Completing Screening Strategy12 monthsComplete screening in both groups, which is defined as completion of the entire screening strategy. For colonoscopy, this requires cecal intubation and an adequate bowel preparation. For individuals who took Septin9 and FIT, positive results must be followed by a colonoscopy with cecal intubation and adequate bowel preparation.
Percentage of Participants With Colonoscopy Follow-up in Intervention Group6 months (after positive FIT)Among individuals in the intervention group who had a positive blood test, proportion who completed a follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months.
Self-reported Willingness to Take Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening on Questionnaire1 day (assessed using baseline survey)Percentage of both groups who answered that they would be willing to take a blood test for colorectal cancer screening
Self-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire1 day (assessed using baseline survey)The most commonly cited advantages of a blood test compared to colonoscopy and stool test in both groups
Self-reported Most Common Reasons for Refusing Blood Test on Questionnaire in Intervention Group1 day (assessed using baseline survey)The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the blood test in the intervention group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The target enrollment specified in the protocol is 360 participants. Actual enrollment was 359 participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Patients will receive a letter noting that they are not up-to-date on screening and encouraging them to contact a study number if they choose to screen with colonoscopy or FIT. Patients who call will speak to a research assistant who is trained in patient navigation and can facilitate referrals for colonoscopy or FIT. Patients will receive a follow-up telephone call that reiterates information in the letter. Patients will also be asked to complete a questionnaire about their beliefs and attitudes regarding CRC screening. The questionnaire will be mailed with the invitation letter and will also be administered over the telephone by the research assistant.
178
Septin9
Patients will receive a letter noting that they are not up-to-date on screening and encouraging them to contact a study number if they choose to screen with colonoscopy or FIT. Letters will also include an option to participate in the blood test, with instructions to call the study number to schedule the blood draw. This option will not appear in the letters sent to the control group. Patients will also receive a follow-up telephone call and a questionnaire. Participants who choose to the blood test (Septin9) will undergo phlebotomy. The blood sample will be run by an off-site commercial laboratory. The study team will notify patients and their primary care physicians of blood test results and will facilitate a colonoscopy referral for those with positive tests. Septin9: Septin9 is a FDA-approved blood test for colorectal cancer screening
181
Total359

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlSeptin9Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
102 Participants94 Participants196 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
76 Participants87 Participants163 Participants
Age, Continuous67 Years66 Years66 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants29 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
151 Participants147 Participants298 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
70 Participants77 Participants147 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
68 Participants62 Participants130 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
178 participants181 participants359 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
171 Participants172 Participants343 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1782 / 181
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1780 / 181
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1780 / 181

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach

Percentage of participants who undergo screening in the intervention group vs. control group, measured 6 months after the initial letter was sent

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlPercentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach17 Participants
Septin9Percentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach31 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Completing Screening Strategy

Complete screening in both groups, which is defined as completion of the entire screening strategy. For colonoscopy, this requires cecal intubation and an adequate bowel preparation. For individuals who took Septin9 and FIT, positive results must be followed by a colonoscopy with cecal intubation and adequate bowel preparation.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlPercentage of Participants Completing Screening Strategy16 Participants
Septin9Percentage of Participants Completing Screening Strategy27 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Colonoscopy Follow-up in Intervention Group

Among individuals in the intervention group who had a positive blood test, proportion who completed a follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months.

Time frame: 6 months (after positive FIT)

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of participants with a positive FIT.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlPercentage of Participants With Colonoscopy Follow-up in Intervention Group1 Participants
Secondary

Self-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire

The most commonly cited advantages of a blood test compared to colonoscopy and stool test in both groups

Time frame: 1 day (assessed using baseline survey)

Population: The same survey was sent to all participants. The planned analysis was to include all participants who returned the survey, rather than stratified by arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlSelf-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire46 Participants
Septin9Self-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire31 Participants
Accustomed to Blood TestsSelf-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire24 Participants
Secondary

Self-reported Most Common Reasons for Refusing Blood Test on Questionnaire in Intervention Group

The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the blood test in the intervention group.

Time frame: 1 day (assessed using baseline survey)

Population: The overall number of participants who indicated that they would refuse a blood test on the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlSelf-reported Most Common Reasons for Refusing Blood Test on Questionnaire in Intervention Group4 Participants
Septin9Self-reported Most Common Reasons for Refusing Blood Test on Questionnaire in Intervention Group3 Participants
Secondary

Self-reported Willingness to Take Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening on Questionnaire

Percentage of both groups who answered that they would be willing to take a blood test for colorectal cancer screening

Time frame: 1 day (assessed using baseline survey)

Population: The same survey was sent to all participants. The planned analysis was to include all participants who returned the survey, rather than stratified by arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlSelf-reported Willingness to Take Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening on Questionnaire65 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026