Assessment of Dental Implants Placed in Posterior Maxillary Ridge Using Densah Burs Versus Standard Drills

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03598049

Enrollment

Registered

2018-07-26

Start date

2018-09-01

Completion date

2019-07-01

Last updated

2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant Site Reaction

Keywords

Implants, Stability, Bone loss, Success

Brief summary

comparing the drilling technique of using densah burs osseo densification drills in posterior maxilla with the normal surgical kit drilling

Detailed description

the densification of bone using the densah burs are thought to be improving the bone quality surrounding the implants thus increasing the primary stability and decreasing the marginal bone loss surrounding the implants comparing to the normal drilling techniques using the conventional implant drilling kit

Interventions

DEVICEdensah burs osseo densification drills

osseo densification of the alveolar bone in maxillary posterior ridge during implant placement

DEVICEconventional surgical burs drilling

conventional implant osteotomy site drilling with implant surgical kit

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to 50 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with partially edentulous in the posterior area of the maxilla, with a residual ridge that allowed insertion of ≤3.5 width implants. * Both sexes. * No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology * No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

Exclusion criteria

* Sinus pathology. * Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day. * Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Psychiatric problems * Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site * Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
implant stability	at the time of surgery	measurement of implant stability using the ostell

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Marginal bone loss	3 month	measurement of the bone level surrounding the implant using cone beam CT

Other

Measure	Time frame	Description
patient satisfaction	3 month	patient satisfaction questionnaire

Contacts

Primary ContactAmira khaled, Masters

amira.khaled5071@yahoo.com01207889984

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026