Skip to content

Neuromodulation in Professional Dancers

One-Shot Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Performance Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscle in Professional Dancers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03596216
Enrollment
51
Registered
2018-07-23
Start date
2018-07-24
Completion date
2018-08-17
Last updated
2019-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dance, Rehabilitation, Sport Performance, Sports Physical Therapy

Brief summary

Tendinopathy of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL), colloquially referred to as dancer's tendinitis, is a common condition in dancers and attributed to high demand on this muscle in positions of extreme ankle plantarflexion and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) flexion and extension. Tradicional conservative treatment includes rest from pain-inducing activities including pointe work and jumping, physical therapy a focusing on movilization of the joints of the first ray and subtalar joint, and antiinflamatory medications. Unfortunately, dancer frecuently do not follow recommendations to rest due to the competitive nature of the field. Those who do not respond to conservative treatment undergo more serious interventions including steroid injections or surgery, each with additional risks and recovery time. To develop experimental protocols aimed at prevention and nonsurgical interventions are needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was To investigate the effects of one shot of low-frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) vs. one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in performance of the Flexor Hallucis Longus muscle in young dancers.

Interventions

OTHERPENS

This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is an invasive intervention by ultrasound and needles.

OTHERTENS

This intervention consisted in the application of an asymmetric biphasic rectangular current of 150 microseconds and 10 Hz using a specifically developed medically certified device (Physio Invasive, Enraf Nonius, Prim, SPAIN). This is a non-invasive intervention by self-adhesive electrodes.

Sponsors

University of Seville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female dancers * Training at least twenty-five hours per week * Pointe training at least five hours per week.

Exclusion criteria

* They had sustained an injury to their stance limb in the past year preventing dancing for at least 1 day * Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale (PPAS) score \>37.5 * Commonly accepted contraindications to invasive phsyiotherapist technique * Any contraindications to needling per se. * Commonly accepted contraindications to electrotherapy * Epilepsy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in balance1 dayAssessed by a single leg balance test
Change in muscular endurence,1 dayAssessed by endurance test (heel raise repetitions).
Change in range of motion of first MTF joint1 dayAssessed using goniometer.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026