Skip to content

Trial of Parotid Sparing Whole Brain Radiation

Randomized Trial of Parotid Sparing Whole Brain Radiation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03595878
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-07-23
Start date
2018-05-09
Completion date
2022-03-16
Last updated
2025-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Xerostomia

Keywords

Whole Brain Radiation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of parotid sparing in reducing measurable xerostomia (dry mouth) in patients undergoing whole brain radiotherapy. This is primarily a two-arm, single-blind, randomized study of parotid sparing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), with a third observational arm of patients who were identified after radiation had already started or who refused randomization but were willing to be followed for quality of life assessment. Qualifying patients who are interested in participating in the trial will be asked to complete an anonymous screening baseline xerostomia questionnaire. If their raw score on this questionnaire meets eligibility criteria, they will be offered enrollment on the study. Patients identified prior to radiation start will be offered enrollment into the interventional randomization arm, with the observation arm offered to those who refuse randomization. Patients identified after radiation has already started, but within 5 days of the first day of radiation, will be offered enrollment into the observational arm. Questionnaires completed by patients who consent to the trial will be assigned patient information (de-anonymized) and serve as their baseline quality of life data. After baseline assessment, subjects will be asked to complete the same questionnaire again at the end of treatment, as well as two weeks, one month, three months, and six months after treatment completion.

Interventions

RADIATIONParotid sparing WBRT

Whole Brain Radiation Therapy with avoidance of the parotid glands

RADIATIONStandard WBRT

Standard Whole Brain Radiation Therapy

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients to be treated with WBRT using 3-dimensional conformal RT in 10-15 fractions to a total dose of 30-35 Gy for any diagnosis other than elective treatment of potentially subclinical intracranial disease. * No prior radiation that would have exposed the parotids to a significant level of radiation (estimated \>10 Gy mean parotid dose). Patients receiving prior stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis are eligible for inclusion in this trial as this form of radiation is highly conformal and exposes the parotids to minimal (estimated \<1 Gy) radiation. * Patients enrolling on the observational arm may have started their current course of whole brain radiation therapy within 5 days prior to completing the baseline screening questionnaire and consenting to study. * Greater than or equal to 18 years of age (no upper age limit). * Raw xerostomia score \< 40 / 80 on the initial screening xerostomia questionnaire. This is calculated by adding up the values from questions 1-8. * Initial xerostomia questionnaire and informed consent obtained within the required time frame (≤ 30 days before RT start for interventional arm; ≤ 5 days after RT start for observational arm).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients receiving WBRT without the use of a CT- or MRI-based planning simulation. * Patients receiving WBRT with the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. * Patient receiving WBRT as elective treatment of potentially subclinical intracranial disease (e.g., WBRT for prophylactic cranial irradiation of small cell lung cancer). * Patients physically unable to communicate by paper or phone to complete the study survey. * Prisoners. * Pregnant patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Xerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentUp to 45 daysBetween baseline and 1 month after the treatment xerostomia symptoms were assessed, in 2 randomized groups namely Arm A and Arm B. Xerostomia symptoms were assessed using the patient-reported study xerostomia questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 8 questions, and each question score changes between 0 to 10. The increasing value represents worse xerostomia symptoms. No xerostomia symptom= 0 and highest xerostomia symptom=10. The total score will be on a scale from 0-80 (8 categories with a maximum score of 10). Changes in xerostomia symptoms in each arm were tabulated. Positive values represent increased xerostomia symptoms and negative values represent decreasing xerostomia symptoms and no difference is no change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom From RelapseUp to 6 monthsThe number of subjects with marginal cervical spine relapse in each randomization arm.
Xerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentUp to 45 daysBetween baseline and 1 month after the treatment xerostomia symptoms were assessed and tabulated based on the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) technique. The Standard WBRT Group includes both randomized (Group A) and non-randomized (Group C) subjects who received WBRT. The Parotid Sparing WBRT Group includes subjects who were randomized and received Parotid Sparing WBRT (Group B). Xerostomia symptoms were assessed using the patient-reported study xerostomia questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 8 questions, and each question score changes between 0 to 10. The increasing value represents worse xerostomia symptoms. No xerostomia symptom= 0 and highest xerostomia symptom=10. The total score will be on a scale from 0-80 (8 categories with a maximum score of 10). Changes were tabulated as: Positive values represent worsened xerostomia symptoms, and both negative values and no change values represent did not worsen.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 05/09/2018 through 02/03/2021 at 3 cancer centers in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Sixty subjects were included in the study: 56 subjects were randomized into 2 groups: Group A (29 subjects) and Group B (27 subjects), and 4 subjects who started therapy according to physician choice, were included in Group C.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A:RandomizedControl Group
Subjects received standard whole-brain radiation therapy
29
Arm B:RandomizedIntervention Group
Subjects received standard whole-brain radiation therapy with avoidance of the parotid glands.
27
Arm C:Observational Arm
Subjects enrolled in this arm per their physician's choice, received standard whole-brain radiation therapy.
4
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath210
Overall StudyDisease progression212

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm C:Observational ArmArm B:RandomizedIntervention GroupArm A:RandomizedControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants15 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants25 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants22 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants27 participants29 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants17 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants10 Participants12 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Xerostomia One Month After Completion of Treatment

Between baseline and 1 month after the treatment xerostomia symptoms were assessed, in 2 randomized groups namely Arm A and Arm B. Xerostomia symptoms were assessed using the patient-reported study xerostomia questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 8 questions, and each question score changes between 0 to 10. The increasing value represents worse xerostomia symptoms. No xerostomia symptom= 0 and highest xerostomia symptom=10. The total score will be on a scale from 0-80 (8 categories with a maximum score of 10). Changes in xerostomia symptoms in each arm were tabulated. Positive values represent increased xerostomia symptoms and negative values represent decreasing xerostomia symptoms and no difference is no change.

Time frame: Up to 45 days

Population: Subjects were randomized in 2 randomized groups namely Arm A and Arm B, completed the treatment, and responded to the quality-of-life questionnaire, both at baseline and after 1 month after completion of treatment. Arm C was not included since Arm C is not a randomized arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Arm - Control GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentImproved: Decreased xerostomia symptoms5 Participants
Randomized Arm - Control GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentNo Change in xerostomia symptoms1 Participants
Randomized Arm - Control GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentWorsened: Increased xerostomia symptoms9 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentImproved: Decreased xerostomia symptoms7 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentNo Change in xerostomia symptoms6 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupXerostomia One Month After Completion of TreatmentWorsened: Increased xerostomia symptoms5 Participants
Secondary

Freedom From Relapse

The number of subjects with marginal cervical spine relapse in each randomization arm.

Time frame: Up to 6 months

Population: The subjects completed the treatment and were assessed for the occurrence of marginal relapse.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Arm - Control GroupFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject with marginal relapse0 Participants
Randomized Arm - Control GroupFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject without marginal relapse15 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject with marginal relapse0 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject without marginal relapse14 Participants
Arm C : Not- Randomized Arm Observational ArmFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject with marginal relapse0 Participants
Arm C : Not- Randomized Arm Observational ArmFreedom From RelapseNumber of subject without marginal relapse1 Participants
Secondary

Xerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the Treatment

Between baseline and 1 month after the treatment xerostomia symptoms were assessed and tabulated based on the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) technique. The Standard WBRT Group includes both randomized (Group A) and non-randomized (Group C) subjects who received WBRT. The Parotid Sparing WBRT Group includes subjects who were randomized and received Parotid Sparing WBRT (Group B). Xerostomia symptoms were assessed using the patient-reported study xerostomia questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 8 questions, and each question score changes between 0 to 10. The increasing value represents worse xerostomia symptoms. No xerostomia symptom= 0 and highest xerostomia symptom=10. The total score will be on a scale from 0-80 (8 categories with a maximum score of 10). Changes were tabulated as: Positive values represent worsened xerostomia symptoms, and both negative values and no change values represent did not worsen.

Time frame: Up to 45 days

Population: Subjects completed the treatment and responded to the quality-of-life questionnaire both at baseline and one month after the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Arm - Control GroupXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia Worsened9 Participants
Randomized Arm - Control GroupXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia did not worsen6 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia Worsened5 Participants
Randomized Arm - Intervention GroupXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia did not worsen13 Participants
Arm C : Not- Randomized Arm Observational ArmXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia Worsened0 Participants
Arm C : Not- Randomized Arm Observational ArmXerostomia Based on Radiotherapy Treatment Fields- One Month After the TreatmentXerostomia did not worsen1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026