Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction
Conditions
Keywords
Intravascular Lithotripsy, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Brief summary
The study design is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, global IDE study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Medical Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in de novo, calcified, stenotic coronary arteries prior to stenting. Disrupt CAD III is being conducted as a staged pivotal study.
Detailed description
Subject Population: Subjects ≥ 18 years of age with de novo, calcified coronary artery lesions presenting with stable, unstable or silent ischemia that are suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Approximately 392 subjects at 50 sites will be enrolled. A minimum of 50% of the total enrollment will come from the United States.Subjects will be followed through discharge, 30 days, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Interventions
Deliver Lithotripsy to the target vessel prior to placing a coronary stent.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
The Coronary IVL System is a proprietary balloon catheter system designed to enhance stent outcomes by enabling delivery of the calcium disrupting capability of lithotripsy prior to balloon dilatation at low pressures. The Coronary IVL System consists of an IVL Balloon Catheter with two integrated pairs of lithotripsy emitters, a Lithotripsy Generator, and Connector Cable.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subject is ≥18 years of age 2. Subjects with native coronary artery disease (including stable or unstable angina and silent ischemia) suitable for PCI 3. For patients with unstable ischemic heart disease, biomarkers (troponin or CK-MB) must be less than or equal to the upper limit of lab normal within 12 hours prior to the procedure (note: if both labs are drawn, both must be normal). 4. For patients with stable ischemic heart disease, biomarkers may be drawn prior to the procedure or at the time of the procedure from the side port of the sheath. 1. If drawn prior to the procedure, biomarkers (troponin or CK-MB) must be less than or equal to the upper limit of lab normal within 12 hours of the procedure (note: if both labs are drawn, both must be normal). 2. If biomarkers are drawn at the time of the procedure from the side port of the sheath prior to any intervention, biomarker results do not need to be analyzed prior to enrollment (note: CK-MB is required if drawn from the sheath). 5. Left ventricular ejection fraction \>25% within 6 months (note: in the case of multiple assessments of LVEF, the measurement closest to enrollment will be used for this criteria; may be assessed at time of index procedure) 6. Subject or legally authorized representative, signs a written Informed Consent form to participate in the study, prior to any study-mandated procedures 7. Lesions in non-target vessels requiring PCI may be treated either: 1. \>30 days prior to the study procedure if the procedure was unsuccessful or complicated; or 2. \>24 hours prior to the study procedure if the procedure was successful and uncomplicated (defined as a final lesion angiographic diameter stenosis \<30% and TIMI 3 flow (visually assessed) for all non-target lesions and vessels without perforation, cardiac arrest or need for defibrillation or cardioversion or hypotension/heart failure requiring mechanical or intravenous hemodynamic support or intubation, and with no post-procedure biomarker elevation \>normal; or 3. \>30 days after the study procedure Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 8. The target lesion must be a de novo coronary lesion that has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure 9. Single de novo target lesion stenosis of protected LMCA, or LAD, RCA or LCX (or of their branches) with: 1. Stenosis of ≥70% and \<100% or 2. Stenosis ≥50% and \<70% (visually assessed) with evidence of ischemia via positive stress test, or fractional flow reserve value ≤0.80, or iFR \<0.90 or IVUS or OCT minimum lumen area ≤4.0 mm² 10. The target vessel reference diameter must be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.0 mm 11. The lesion length must not exceed 40 mm 12. The target vessel must have TIMI flow 3 at baseline (visually assessed; may be assessed after pre- dilatation) 13. Evidence of calcification at the lesion site by, a) angiography, with fluoroscopic radio-opacities noted without cardiac motion prior to contrast injection involving both sides of the arterial wall in at least one location and total length of calcium of at least 15 mm and extending partially into the target lesion, OR by b) IVUS or OCT, with presence of ≥270 degrees of calcium on at least 1 cross section 14. Ability to pass a 0.014 guide wire across the lesion
Exclusion criteria
1. Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up visits 2. Subject is a member of a vulnerable population as defined in 21 CFR 56.111, including individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention 3. Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint 4. Subject is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment) 5. Unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (i.e., aspirin, and either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months (for patients not on oral anticoagulation) 6. Subject has an allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated 7. Subject experienced an acute MI (STEMI or non-STEMI) within 30 days prior to index procedure, defined as a clinical syndrome consistent with an acute coronary syndrome with troponin or CK-MB greater than 1 times the local laboratory's upper limit of normal 8. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure 9. Renal failure with serum creatinine \>2.5 mg/dL or chronic dialysis 10. History of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months, or any prior intracranial hemorrhage or permanent neurologic deficit 11. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 6 months 12. Untreated pre-procedural hemoglobin \<10 g/dL or intention to refuse blood transfusions if one should become necessary 13. Coagulopathy, including but not limited to platelet count \<100,000 or International Normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.7 (INR is only required in subjects who have taken warfarin within 2 weeks of enrollment) 14. Subject has a hypercoagulable disorder such as polycythemia vera, platelet count \>750,000 or other disorders 15. Uncontrolled diabetes defined as a HbA1c greater than or equal to 10% 16. Subject has an active systemic infection on the day of the index procedure with either fever, leukocytosis or requiring intravenous antibiotics 17. Subjects in cardiogenic shock or with clinical evidence of left-sided heart failure (S3 gallop, pulmonary rales, oliguria, or hypoxemia) 18. Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic BP \>180 mm Hg or diastolic BP \>110 mm Hg) 19. Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 1 year 20. Non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA or PFO occlusion, etc.) within 30 days prior to the index procedure 21. Planned non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA or PFO occlusion, etc.) within 30 days after the index procedure 22. Subject refusing or not a candidate for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery 23. Planned use of atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloon, or any investigational device other than lithotripsy 24. High SYNTAX Score (≥33) if assessed as standard of care, unless the local heart team has met and recommends PCI is the most appropriate treatment for the patient 25. Unprotected left main diameter stenosis \>30% 26. Target vessel is excessively tortuous defined as the presence of two or more bends \>90º or three or more bends \>75º 27. Definite or possible thrombus (by angiography or intravascular imaging) in the target vessel 28. Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target lesion 29. Target lesion is an ostial location (LAD, LCX, or RCA, within 5 mm of ostium) or an unprotected left main lesion 30. Target lesion is a bifurcation with ostial diameter stenosis ≥30% 31. Second lesion with \>50% stenosis in the same target vessel as the target lesion including its side branches 32. Target lesion is located in a native vessel that can only be reached by going through a saphenous vein or arterial bypass graft 33. Previous stent within the target vessel implanted within the last year 34. Previous stent within 10 mm of the target lesion regardless of the timing of its implantation 35. Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the target vessel at baseline or after guidewire passage
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Experienced Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Within 30 Days Post-procedure | within 30 days of index procedure | The primary safety endpoint was freedom from MACE at 30 days - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <50%) | 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure | The primary effectiveness endpoint was Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual in-stent stenosis \<50% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE. The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) | 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure | Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual stenosis \<=30% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) | at end of procedure | Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with \<=30% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Number of Participants With Serious Angiographic Complications | at end of procedure | Serious Angiographic Complications defined as severe dissection (Type D to F), perforation, abrupt closure, and persistent slow flow or persistent no reflow. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MACE Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | MACE at 6 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MACE Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | MACE at 12 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MACE Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | MACE at 24 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. 30 day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| All-Cause Death Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| All-Cause Death Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | All-cause death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| All-Cause Death Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | All-cause death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| All-Cause Death Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | All-cause death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Cardiac Death Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Cardiac Death Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | Cardiac death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Cardiac Death Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | Cardiac death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Cardiac Death Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | Cardiac death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MI Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MI Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MI Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| MI Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| TV-MI Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| TV-MI Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| TV-MI Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Ischemia-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Ischemia-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TVR Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TLR Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Non-ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Any Revascularizations Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 30 days. 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Any Revascularizations Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 6 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Any Revascularizations Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 12 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Any Revascularizations Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 24 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Stent Thrombosis Rate at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Stent Thrombosis Rate at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Stent Thrombosis Rate at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Stent Thrombosis Rate at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Number of Participants With Device Crossing Success | at end of procedure | Device Crossing Success defined as the ability to deliver the IVL catheter across the target lesion, and delivery of lithotripsy without serious angiographic complications immediately after IVL. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Definition at 30 Days | within 30 days of index procedure | 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 12 Months | within 12 months of index procedure | For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 24 Months | within 24 months of index procedure | For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 6 Months | within 6 months of index procedure | For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
| Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <50%) | at end of procedure | Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with \<50% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set. |
Countries
France, Germany, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Study recruitment and enrollment took place at 47 global centers including 38 in the United States and 9 in Europe between January 9, 2019 and March 27, 2020. A total of 431 subjects with de novo, calcified, stenotic, coronary arteries were enrolled and treated with the Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System.
Pre-assignment details
431 subjects were enrolled into the study. The definition of enrollment is when the subject signs informed consent, meets all inclusion criteria, none of the exclusion criteria, and the IVL catheter has been inserted over a 0.014 guidewire which had been previously passed across the study lesion.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Roll-In) The first subject enrolled at each site is considered a roll-in. Per protocol, data on roll-in subjects were collected through 30 days, at which time subject participation was complete. | 47 |
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) The pivotal analysis set was the primary analysis cohort used to assess the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. Data on pivotal subjects was collected through 30 days for primary endpoints. Long-term follow-up for pivotal subjects to 24 months is complete. | 384 |
| Total | 431 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Coronary IVL System (Roll-In) | Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 70.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 71.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 71.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 |
| Age, Customized Median (Q1, Q3) | 72.0 years | 71.0 years | 71.0 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 16 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 41 Participants | 330 Participants | 371 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 38 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 13 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 12 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 38 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 35 Participants | 318 Participants | 353 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Europe | 9 Participants | 49 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 38 Participants | 335 Participants | 373 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | 90 Participants | 102 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants | 294 Participants | 329 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 47 | 2 / 384 | 7 / 384 | 22 / 384 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 47 | 54 / 384 | 140 / 384 | 162 / 384 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 47 | 54 / 384 | 136 / 384 | 173 / 384 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Experienced Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Within 30 Days Post-procedure
The primary safety endpoint was freedom from MACE at 30 days - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Primary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported. Additionally, one subject was excluded from the primary safety endpoint analysis due to insufficient follow-up (\<23 days).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants Who Experienced Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Within 30 Days Post-procedure | 92.2 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <50%)
The primary effectiveness endpoint was Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual in-stent stenosis \<50% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE. The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Primary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <50%) | 92.4 percentage of participants |
All-Cause Death Rate at 12 Months
All-cause death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | All-Cause Death Rate at 12 Months | 1.8 percentage of participants |
All-Cause Death Rate at 24 Months
All-cause death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | All-Cause Death Rate at 24 Months | 5.9 percentage of participants |
All-Cause Death Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | All-Cause Death Rate at 30 Days | 0.5 percentage of participants |
All-Cause Death Rate at 6 Months
All-cause death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | All-Cause Death Rate at 6 Months | 1.3 percentage of participants |
Any Revascularizations Rate at 12 Months
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 12 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Any Revascularizations Rate at 12 Months | 12.3 percentage of participants |
Any Revascularizations Rate at 24 Months
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 24 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Any Revascularizations Rate at 24 Months | 15.4 percentage of participants |
Any Revascularizations Rate at 30 Days
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 30 days. 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Any Revascularizations Rate at 30 Days | 2.6 percentage of participants |
Any Revascularizations Rate at 6 Months
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 6 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Any Revascularizations Rate at 6 Months | 7.9 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death Rate at 12 Months
Cardiac death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Cardiac Death Rate at 12 Months | 1.1 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death Rate at 24 Months
Cardiac death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Cardiac Death Rate at 24 Months | 2.7 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Cardiac Death Rate at 30 Days | 0.5 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death Rate at 6 Months
Cardiac death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Cardiac Death Rate at 6 Months | 0.8 percentage of participants |
ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months | 4.3 percentage of participants |
ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months | 6.4 percentage of participants |
ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months | 2.4 percentage of participants |
ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months | 6.0 percentage of participants |
ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months | 8.5 percentage of participants |
ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months | 2.9 percentage of participants |
Ischemia-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Ischemia-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) Rate at 30 Days | 1.3 percentage of participants |
Ischemia-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Ischemia-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) Rate at 30 Days | 1.6 percentage of participants |
MACE Rate at 12 Months
MACE at 12 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MACE Rate at 12 Months | 13.6 percentage of participants |
MACE Rate at 24 Months
MACE at 24 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MACE Rate at 24 Months | 18.9 percentage of participants |
MACE Rate at 6 Months
MACE at 6 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MACE Rate at 6 Months | 10.2 percentage of participants |
MI Rate at 12 Months
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MI Rate at 12 Months | 10.5 percentage of participants |
MI Rate at 24 Months
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MI Rate at 24 Months | 12.6 percentage of participants |
MI Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MI Rate at 30 Days | 7.3 percentage of participants |
MI Rate at 6 Months
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | MI Rate at 6 Months | 9.1 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TLR Rate at 30 Days | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TVR Rate at 30 Days | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months | 0 percentage of participants |
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months | 4.8 percentage of participants |
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months | 7.2 percentage of participants |
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days | 1.0 percentage of participants |
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition). For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Non-Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months | 3.2 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%)
Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with \<=30% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: at end of procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) | 369 Participants |
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <50%)
Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with \<50% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: at end of procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <50%) | 370 Participants |
Number of Participants With Device Crossing Success
Device Crossing Success defined as the ability to deliver the IVL catheter across the target lesion, and delivery of lithotripsy without serious angiographic complications immediately after IVL. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: at end of procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Device Crossing Success | 368 Participants |
Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%)
Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual stenosis \<=30% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%) | 354 Participants |
Number of Participants With Serious Angiographic Complications
Serious Angiographic Complications defined as severe dissection (Type D to F), perforation, abrupt closure, and persistent slow flow or persistent no reflow. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: at end of procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Number of Participants With Serious Angiographic Complications | 12 Participants |
Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months | 6.8 percentage of participants |
Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months | 6.8 percentage of participants |
Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days | 6.8 percentage of participants |
Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB \> 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN). For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months | 6.8 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 12 Months | 7.3 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 24 Months | 7.3 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 30 Days | 7.3 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 6 Months | 7.3 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 12 Months
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 12 Months | 2.6 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 24 Months
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 24 Months | 2.6 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 6 Months
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 6 Months | 2.6 percentage of participants |
Rate of MI Using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Definition at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Rate of MI Using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Definition at 30 Days | 2.6 percentage of participants |
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 12 Months
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Stent Thrombosis Rate at 12 Months | 1.6 percentage of participants |
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 24 Months
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Stent Thrombosis Rate at 24 Months | 2.7 percentage of participants |
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 30 Days
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. 30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Stent Thrombosis Rate at 30 Days | 0.8 percentage of participants |
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 6 Months
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials. Circ. 2007.115.2344-51. For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Stent Thrombosis Rate at 6 Months | 1.3 percentage of participants |
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 12 Months
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 12 Months | 11.9 percentage of participants |
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 24 Months
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 24 Months | 16.1 percentage of participants |
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 30 Days
Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. 30 day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 30 Days | 7.6 percentage of participants |
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 6 Months
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods. For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 6 Months | 9.1 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) Rate at 30 Days
30-day rates are presented as proportions. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 30 days of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) Rate at 30 Days | 7.3 percentage of participants |
TV-MI Rate at 12 Months
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 12 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | TV-MI Rate at 12 Months | 7.8 percentage of participants |
TV-MI Rate at 24 Months
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 24 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | TV-MI Rate at 24 Months | 8.1 percentage of participants |
TV-MI Rate at 6 Months
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
Time frame: within 6 months of index procedure
Population: Data collected from the roll-in subjects were not pre-specified to be reported as a Secondary Outcome Measure; therefore, only pivotal group is reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary IVL System (Pivotal) | TV-MI Rate at 6 Months | 7.6 percentage of participants |