Skip to content

Diuretic Response in Advanced Heart Failure: Bolus Intermittent vs Continuous INfusion

Diuretic Treatment in High Risk Decompensated Advanced Heart Failure. Bolus Intermittent Versus Continuous Infusion of Furosemide: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03592836
Acronym
DRAIN
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
2013-05-01
Completion date
2017-12-22
Last updated
2018-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV

Brief summary

Loop diuretics are the main therapy for decongestion of patients with advanced acute heart failure. However, these patients often develop diuretic-resistance or even diuretic-refractoriness. In order to overcome such resistance to diuretic, the clinician can increase the dose of furosemide, or change the way of administration (continuous infusion versus boluses) or associate a different class of diuretics (thiazide diuretics, K+-sparing diuretics) up to the addition of low doses of inotropic agents to improve renal perfusion. At the present time there is no evidence in literature in advanced acute heart failure patients about the superiority of the treatment with furosemide in continuous infusion or in intermittent boluses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of furosemide in boluses versus continuous infusion in advanced acute heart failure.

Interventions

intravenous administration of diuretics

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Advanced heart failure * WET ≥ 12 * Systolic blood pressure ≤ 110 mmHg * Serum sodium ≤ 135 mEq/L * Left systolic ventricular insufficiency (FE \< 35%) note for at least 6 months * Class NYHA III-IV despite medical treatment maximal

Exclusion criteria

* Acute coronary syndrome * Shock cardiogenic * Chronic renal failure stage V

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom from congestion72 hours after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Worsening of renal function72 hours after randomizationIncrease in creatinine value \> 0.3 mg/dl or increase \> 1.5 times
Worsening or persistent HF at 72 h72 hours after randomizationNeed to increase the dose of inotropes or diuretics
Change in body weight72 hours after randomization
Laboratory data variations in NTproBNP72 hours after randomization
Treatment failure72 hours after randomizationComposed by the following events: persistence of congestion, need to increase diuretic treatment, need of renal replacement treatment
Weight differences based on diuretic dose unity72 hours after randomization

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026