Skip to content

Observational Study to Assess Optimal ECPR Settings After Resuscitation

Multi-center Observational Study to Assess Optimal ECMO Settings During the First Hours of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03592810
Acronym
MOFE
Enrollment
26
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
2018-07-18
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Brief summary

Rationale: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) might improve outcome after cardiac arrest. However, it is well established that reperfusion injury of the brain can cause microvascular and endothelial dysfunction, leading to cellular necrosis and apoptosis. While performing ECPR, following the European resuscitation guidelines, it is yet unknown how to set the ECMO settings in order to minimize ischemia-reperfusion injury of the brain. Objective: In this study, we want to elaborate on the optimal ECMO settings in the first three hours after initiation of ECPR. Study design: Prospective, multi-centre, observational study Study population: All patients receiving ECPR in the age between 18 and 70 years, with low flow duration\<60min and receiving cerebral oximetry monitoring Intervention: application of an adhesive regional oximetry sensor on the patient's forehead and withdrawal of 12 ml extra blood in all patients. Main study parameters/endpoints: Cerebral Performance Category at 6 months. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) will be determined from routine blood drawings.

Interventions

OTHERSettings of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Compare the settings of the ECMO in different European hospitals and relate them to cerebral saturation and neurological outcome, using Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Witnessed cardiac arrest or signs of life during CPR (such as gasping or movement) * Age\>18 and \< 70 years * Duration of low-flow \< 60 min before decision to proceed with ECPR * High quality CPR (defined as end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2et) \>10 mmHg) provided for a minimum of 15 minutes without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) * Presumed cardiac cause of cardiac arrest (such as Chest pain before collapse, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) as initial rhythm or ST-elevation on ECG) * Cerebral oxymetry monitoring initiated during CPR preceding ECPR

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a GCS\<15 before CPR. * Known pre-arrest cerebral performance category CPC ≥ 3 * Presumed noncardiac cause * Unwitnessed collapse * Suspected or confirmed pregnancy * ROSC within 5 minutes of Advanced cardiopulmonary life support (ACLS) performed by emergency medical service (EMS) team * Conscious patient * Known bleeding diathesis or suspected or confirmed acute or recent intracranial bleeding * Suspected or confirmed acute stroke * Known severe chronic organ dysfunction or other limitations to therapy * Do not resuscitate order or other circumstances that make 180 day survival unlikely

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CPC score 6 months6 monthsTo prospectively identify parameters correlated with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC)\* ≤ 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CPC score discharge6 monthsParameters correlated with a CPC\* ≤ 2
Glasgow coma scale (GCS) day 286 monthsParameters correlated with a GCS\>13
GCS total6 monthsParameters correlated with a GCS \> 13
28 day mortality6 monthsParameters correlated to 28 days mortality
Hospital survival6 monthsParameters correlated to hospital survival

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026