Skip to content

Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03592368
Enrollment
97
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
2018-10-15
Completion date
2023-01-27
Last updated
2024-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Mood, Mood Disorders

Brief summary

Hostile interpretation bias may be a feature of severe, chronic irritability in children, one of the most common psychiatric symptoms of childhood. Interpretation bias training (IBT) is a computer-based training program that may reduce irritability in youths. This trial lays the groundwork for a test IBT on irritability.

Detailed description

This trial lays the foundation for a preliminary test of efficacy of IBT on irritability by establishing IBT's neurocognitive treatment targets: hostile interpretation bias and response in the neural threat-learning system. The design is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of IBT on its targets. The study will have four arms, with 25 participants in each arm for all four conditions of training (active versus sham) and scanning (in MRI or out of MRI scanner). During IBT, participants judge as happy or angry facial expressions which are on a continuum between happy and angry. The point at which judgments shift from predominantly happy to angry on this continuum is the indifference point. During training feedback encourages no change in the indifference point or a change in the indifference point towards more happy judgments of ambiguous faces. A shift in indifference point towards more benign judgments is interpreted as a reduction in hostile interpretation. The design will test whether active relative to sham IBT shifts the indifference point towards more benign judgments. Neural response to active versus sham IBT will be measured in half the sample.

Interventions

DEVICEIBT

Interpretation bias training

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescents in mental health treatment, with at least: 1. mild, clinically significant irritability, and 2. typical intellectual functioning (IQ\>80)

Exclusion criteria

* Any of the following mental health diagnoses: 1. current post-traumatic stress 2. lifetime bipolar I or II disorder 3. lifetime cyclothymic disorder 4. lifetime psychotic disorder 5. lifetime autism spectrum disorder * Major medical problems, including head trauma. * MRI-specific safety exclusions for the MRI arms. * Clinical instability.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Interpretation BiasUp to one day before and after the single 1 day training session of Interpretation bias training session.Interpretation bias is measured by the indifference point of happy-angry judgments of a continuum of 15 images of face emotion expression that are morphed between completely happy=1 to completely angry=15 facial expressions. Indifference point is represented on this scale of 1 to 15 faces. It represents the point on the face continuum where judgements change from predominantly happy to predominantly angry. Indifference points have a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 15, though are typically in the middle of the face-emotion continuum, e.g. 7. Lower indifference points represent a higher bias towards hostile (or angry) judgments. Change in interpretation bias is the difference between the post- and pre-training indifference points. This can range from -14 to 14, with positive numbers reflecting the degree to which the happy/angry decision bias is shifted towards more happy judgements. High positive numbers reflect a greater increase in happy judgments.
Neural Response in Threat Learning System.During the course of the 1 day single session of interpretation bias training session.Amygdala functional connectivity to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is measured by covariance in fluctuations in blood oxygen-level dependent signal between these regions during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the course of training. The outcome measure is a count of these randomized participants for whom the fMRI measure is valid for the planned connectivity analysis. These participants completed the task in scanner with acceptable behavioral data and fMRI data. Quality control for fMRI included visual inspection of brain images for quality, coverage, and proper alignment across functional, anatomic and template images. The fMRI images passed analysis benchmarks of \<20% censored volumes and \<0.25 mm Euclidean distance average censored motion across the task. Censor thresholds are 0.3 mm Euclidean distance and 5% voxels with outlying intensity values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Learning RateDuring the course of the 1 day single interpretation bias training session.Learning rate as measured by a reinforcement learning computational model during IBT, please see the reference Stoddard et al., 2023, for model details. As in general reinforcement learning models, it is the proportion of prediction error that is applied to future expectations. In this trial, when a participant received feedback about a judgement they made of a face, the participant implicitly compares that feedback to their expectations about that face. The difference between the feedback and their expectations is called prediction error. The learning rate the proportion of this prediction error that is applied to future expectations across the learning session. In that way it represents learning. Learning rate is a continuous, unitless value. It ranges from 0, representing no learning, to 1, representing perfect learning. It is generally small. The learning rate reported here is its form estimated across face emotions (see Stoddard et al., 2023).
IrritabilityWithin one week prior to Interpretation bias training and one week +/- 3 days after Interpretation bias training.Irritability is the tendency towards anger and temper outburst as measured by the Affective Reactivity Index, a seven item scale. Each item has 3 response options which are coded as follows: not true=0, somewhat true=1, and certainly true=2. The first six items are summed to generate a total score that reflects the degree over irritability over the past week. The Affective Reactivity Index ranges from 0 to 12. Higher values reflect more irritability. What is reported here is the average post- minus pre-treatment score, by parent report. In these differences, negative values are in the unit of this scale and the absolute value represents the degree of irritability reduction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active IBT, Out of MRI
IBT: Interpretation bias training
28
Sham IBT, Out of MRI
IBT: Interpretation bias training
24
Active IBT, In MRI
IBT: Interpretation bias training
20
Sham IBT, In MRI
IBT: Interpretation bias training
21
Total93

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyPer protocol, randomized but not exposed to intervention due to COVID policy0100
Overall StudyPer protocol, received intervention but with inadequate engagement for arm inclusion1100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive IBT, Out of MRISham IBT, Out of MRIActive IBT, In MRISham IBT, In MRITotal
Age, Continuous15.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
14.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
15.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.55
15.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
15.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants23 Participants19 Participants17 Participants84 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Indifference Point5.60 units on a morph continuum scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
5.49 units on a morph continuum scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13
6.37 units on a morph continuum scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
5.29 units on a morph continuum scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36
5.66 units on a morph continuum scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants23 Participants15 Participants19 Participants80 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants24 participants20 participants21 participants93 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants13 Participants11 Participants11 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants11 Participants9 Participants10 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 260 / 200 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 261 / 200 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 260 / 201 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Interpretation Bias

Interpretation bias is measured by the indifference point of happy-angry judgments of a continuum of 15 images of face emotion expression that are morphed between completely happy=1 to completely angry=15 facial expressions. Indifference point is represented on this scale of 1 to 15 faces. It represents the point on the face continuum where judgements change from predominantly happy to predominantly angry. Indifference points have a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 15, though are typically in the middle of the face-emotion continuum, e.g. 7. Lower indifference points represent a higher bias towards hostile (or angry) judgments. Change in interpretation bias is the difference between the post- and pre-training indifference points. This can range from -14 to 14, with positive numbers reflecting the degree to which the happy/angry decision bias is shifted towards more happy judgements. High positive numbers reflect a greater increase in happy judgments.

Time frame: Up to one day before and after the single 1 day training session of Interpretation bias training session.

Population: Arms are collapsed across completing IBT in or out of the scanner.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active IBTChange in Interpretation Bias1.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Sham IBTChange in Interpretation Bias0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Neural Response in Threat Learning System.

Amygdala functional connectivity to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is measured by covariance in fluctuations in blood oxygen-level dependent signal between these regions during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the course of training. The outcome measure is a count of these randomized participants for whom the fMRI measure is valid for the planned connectivity analysis. These participants completed the task in scanner with acceptable behavioral data and fMRI data. Quality control for fMRI included visual inspection of brain images for quality, coverage, and proper alignment across functional, anatomic and template images. The fMRI images passed analysis benchmarks of \<20% censored volumes and \<0.25 mm Euclidean distance average censored motion across the task. Censor thresholds are 0.3 mm Euclidean distance and 5% voxels with outlying intensity values.

Time frame: During the course of the 1 day single session of interpretation bias training session.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active IBTNeural Response in Threat Learning System.16 Participants
Sham IBTNeural Response in Threat Learning System.18 Participants
Secondary

Irritability

Irritability is the tendency towards anger and temper outburst as measured by the Affective Reactivity Index, a seven item scale. Each item has 3 response options which are coded as follows: not true=0, somewhat true=1, and certainly true=2. The first six items are summed to generate a total score that reflects the degree over irritability over the past week. The Affective Reactivity Index ranges from 0 to 12. Higher values reflect more irritability. What is reported here is the average post- minus pre-treatment score, by parent report. In these differences, negative values are in the unit of this scale and the absolute value represents the degree of irritability reduction.

Time frame: Within one week prior to Interpretation bias training and one week +/- 3 days after Interpretation bias training.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active IBTIrritability-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Sham IBTIrritability-1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
p-value: 0.12t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Learning Rate

Learning rate as measured by a reinforcement learning computational model during IBT, please see the reference Stoddard et al., 2023, for model details. As in general reinforcement learning models, it is the proportion of prediction error that is applied to future expectations. In this trial, when a participant received feedback about a judgement they made of a face, the participant implicitly compares that feedback to their expectations about that face. The difference between the feedback and their expectations is called prediction error. The learning rate the proportion of this prediction error that is applied to future expectations across the learning session. In that way it represents learning. Learning rate is a continuous, unitless value. It ranges from 0, representing no learning, to 1, representing perfect learning. It is generally small. The learning rate reported here is its form estimated across face emotions (see Stoddard et al., 2023).

Time frame: During the course of the 1 day single interpretation bias training session.

Population: Collapsed across the in and out of scanner groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active IBTLearning Rate0.019 proportion of prediction error
Sham IBTLearning Rate0.017 proportion of prediction error
p-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026