Skip to content

TACE-HAIC vs. HAIC for Potentially Resectable HCC

Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization With Hepatic Artery Chemotherapy Infusion for Patients With Potentially Resectable HCC

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03591705
Enrollment
240
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
2018-07-06
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2021-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Potentially Resection

Brief summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most commonly malignant tumors around the world. Hepatic resection or liver transplantation is the radical method to cure the disease. However, due to large tumors, surgical treatment is suitable for early-stage and well-reserved liver function patients. Therefore, in clinical practice, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a preferential and standard treatment of potentially resectable HCC. EACH trial opened the door to FOLFOX-based system chemotherapy for advanced HCC patients. Recently, investigators have showed that hepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX-based chemotherapy (HAIC) was safe and efficient for HCC patients. Several clinical studies showed that HAIC bring better tumor response rate that the conditional TACE. The combination of TACE with HAIC (TACE-HAIC), theoretically can significantly increase the local doses of chemotherapeutic agents in the liver, reduce the viability of HCC cells and increase the hepatectomy rate. However, this hasn't been verified in clinical application. To identify a more effective and safety way for treating potentially resectable HCC patients, this study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy between HAIC and TACE-HAIC for those patients.

Interventions

transcatheter arterial chemo-lipiodolization with EADM 30mg/m2, followed by hepatic artery infusion Oxa 85 mg/m2, CF 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 1200mg/m2 infusion 23h.

DRUGHAIC

hepatic artery infusion Oxa 85 mg/m2, CF 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 400 mg/m2, 5-Fu 1200mg/m2 infusion 23h.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-75 years * The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) * Diagnosed as potentially resectable with consensus by the panel of liver surgeons * stage BCLC A/B, without extra-hepatic involvement * No previous anti-HCC treatment * Eastern Co-operative Group performance status 2 or less * Liver function: Child's A or B (score \< 7)

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy * underlying serve cardiac or renal diseases * Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial * Patients ineligible for hepatic artery embolization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
progression-free survival6-12 monthsTime to progression, last follow-up or death after random assignment to TACE-HAIC or HAIC

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival6-12 monthstime to death or last follow-up after random assignment to TACE-HAIC or HAIC
Downstage hepatectomy rate6-12 monthsThe hepatectomy rate after TACE-HAIC or HAIC

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJiliang Qiu
qiujl@sysucc.org.cn+862087342654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026