Skip to content

Using Three Different Final Irrigants and Showing Their Effects on the Success of Revascularization

Assessment of Implementing Nano-technology in the Irrigation Protocol of One Step Revascularization For Necrotic Mature Teeth

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03591172
Enrollment
75
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
2018-09-30
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2018-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative Pain

Brief summary

this study will assess different irrigating materials on the success revascularization of necrotic mature teeth associated with PRF.

Detailed description

Nano-propolis and Propolis will be used as final endodontic irrigants and will be compared to saline in Revascularization of necrotic mature teeth.

Interventions

DRUGPropolis

Using propolis as a final irrigation in revascularization

DRUGNano-propolis

Using Nano-propolis as a final irrigation in revasculariztion

DRUGsaline

Using saline as a final irrigation in revasculariztion

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* mature teeth. * teeth with periapical periodontitis. * Maxillary anterior teeth * Patients should be free from any systemic disease * Patients who will agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with immature roots. * Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Patients with swelling. .Pregnant females. .Patients who could/would not participate in a 1-year follow-up. .Patients with fistula. .Patients with old age. .Teeth with periodontal involvement. .Teeth with vertical root fractures. .Non-restorable teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post-operative pain: Visual analogue scale1 yearpost-operative pain evaluated using Visual analogue scale , 0 no pain, 10 severe pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
periapical healing1 yearevaluated radiographically
sensitivity1 yearelectric pulp tester
survival1 yearclinical evaluation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026