Skip to content

Understanding the Effect of Flavor on Hookah Smoking Experience

Understanding Tobacco Flavor Effects on Waterpipe Smokers' Experiences and Exposures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03589599
Enrollment
144
Registered
2018-07-18
Start date
2017-03-21
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Waterpipe Smoking

Brief summary

This project addresses the need for evidence about the effect of flavoring manipulation on waterpipe smokers' satisfaction, dependence, harm perception, and toxicants exposure. Specifically, in this clinical study investigators will compare the effect on flavored and non-flavored waterpipe tobacco on smoking behavior, subjective experiences and toxicant exposure among waterpipe users. Findings from this study will help informing flavor-based product regulation by the FDA.

Detailed description

Waterpipe (WP) tobacco smoking (a.k.a. hookah, shisha, narghile) is increasing rapidly in the United States (US), particularly among young people. Evidence suggests that WP smoking can lead to dependence, other tobacco use, and many of the known smoking-related diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. These alarming trends led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 to propose including the WP under its regulatory authority, allowing the FDA to apply evidence-based regulatory approaches to control WP spread in the US. Given the salience of flavored tobacco in shaping the WP experience, regulating WP tobacco flavor represents a promising approach for the FDA to curb WP use among US youth. This project aims to assist the FDA in these efforts by providing answers to specific questions pertinent to the potential of WP regulation through flavor. These include: - How would flavor manipulation affect the smoking experience and satisfaction of WP users at different stages of their smoking trajectory - How would smoking non-preferred flavor or unflavored WP tobacco reflects on smokers' exposure to nicotine, and dependence; and - How would flavor manipulation influence puffing behavior and exposure to toxicants such as carbon monoxide (CO) among WP smokers. Answers to these questions will help the FDA predict the impact of flavor regulation on WP experimentation and continued use. In this study, investigators will use clinical laboratory methods to answer these questions. Two groups of WP smokers will be recruited based on their use frequency: low (Beginners) vs. high frequency (Experienced) smokers (72/group; total 144; age 18-30). Each participant will undergo 2 WP smoking sessions that differ by flavor (preferred flavor; unflavored), while measurement of WP satisfaction, dependence, harm perception, and exposure to nicotine and toxicants will be conducted. The response of WP smokers at different stages of their WP smoking trajectory (Beginners vs. Experienced) to flavor manipulation, will allow to predict the effect of limiting flavors on a wide range of WP smokers. This project promises to provide the first evidence to guide the FDA in terms of the potential of regulating WP flavored tobacco on WP uptake and use in the US.

Interventions

OTHERFlavored tobacco

Effects of flavored tobacco

OTHERNon-flavored tobacco

Effects of non-flavored tobacco

Sponsors

Florida International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Generally healthy individuals (determined by physical examination). * Age of 18-30 years. * Is willing to provide informed consent. * Is willing to attend the lab as required by the study protocol. * WP smokers who smoke flavored WP tobacco. * Have abstained from WP for 12 hours prior to each session

Exclusion criteria

* Report smoking cigarettes regularly (\> 5 cigarettes/month in the past year). * Report regular use of any other tobacco/nicotine product (e.g., e-cig, pipes, cigars) in the past year. * Women who are breast-feeding or test positive for pregnancy (by urinalysis at screening). * Individuals with self-reported history of chronic disease or psychiatric conditions. * Individuals with history of or active cardiovascular disease, low or high blood pressure, seizures, and regular use of prescription medications (other than vitamins or birth control).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma nicotineDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Blood will be taken 2 times in each smoking session: before and after an approximately 45-min ad lib use periodChange in plasma nicotine level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Puff topographyDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Puffing behavior is continuously measured during each smoking session (an approximately 45-min ad lib use period)measurement of puffing behavior
Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal ScaleDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Questionnaire will be administered 2 times in each smoking session: before and after an approximately 45-min ad lib use period.This scale is used to assess the extent to which product use reduces tobacco abstinence symptoms, and consists of 11 items scored 0 - 100. These items are presented as Visual Analog Scale with item (measure) centered above a horizontal line anchored on the left with not at all and on the right with extremely.
Tiffany-Drobes Questionnaire of Smoking UrgesDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Questionnaire will be administered 2 times in each smoking session: before and after an approximately 45-min ad lib use period.This scale is used to assess the extent to which product use reduces tobacco abstinence symptoms, and consists of 10 items that are scored 0 - 7. Rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).
Carbon monoxide levelsDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Carbon monoxide levels will be measured 2 times in each smoking session:before and after an approximately 45-min ad lib use periodChange in carbon monoxide levels (in parts per mission)
Duke Sensory QuestionnaireDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Questionnaire will be administered after each of the 2 smoking sessions. Each session is approximately 45-min ad lib use period.This scale assess participants sensory experience of the inhaled product. The scale has nine items. All items will be scored on a 7-point Likert scale anchored at the extremes (1= not at all; 7=extremely).
The Cigarette/WP Evaluation Scale (WES)During participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Questionnaire will be administered after each of the 2 smoking sessions. Each session is approximately 45-min ad lib use period.This scale assesses participants' perception of the smoked waterpipe, The scale has 11 items. All items will be scored on a 7-point Likert scale anchored at the extremes (1= not at all; 7=extremely).
Harm perceptionDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Questionnaire will be administered after each of the 2 smoking sessions. Each session is approximately 45-min ad lib use period.This scale assess waterpipe harm perception and measure perceptions of waterpipe relative risk compared to cigarettes. The scale will be scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all harmful), to 7 (extremely harmful).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rateDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Heat rate will be measured from baseline continuously throughout each approximately 45-min sessionrChange in heart rate, measured in beats per minute
Blood pressureDuring participants' 1st and 2nd visit. Blood pressure will be measured from baseline continuously throughout each approximately 45-min sessionChange in blood pressure, measured in mm/hg

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026