Skip to content

TOMO Versus IMRT in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

Comparison of Tomotherapy Versus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Prospective,Phase II Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03588403
Enrollment
110
Registered
2018-07-17
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2018-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Brief summary

Tomotherapy is a new radiation planning and delivery technology which may allow for delivery of higher radiation doses with less damage to normal tissues. The investigators aim to compare the treatment efficacy and quality of life between tomotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Interventions

RADIATIONTOMO

Tomotherapy

RADIATIONIMRT

Intensity modulated radiotherapy

Sponsors

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing carcinoma. 2. Tumor staged T1-4N0-3M0 (according to the 8th AJCC staging system) 3. Performance status: KPS\>70 4. With normal liver function test (ALT, AST \<1.5ULN) 5. Renal: creatinine clearance \>60ml/min 6. Without hematopathy,marrow: WBC \>4\*109/L, HGB\>80G/L, and PLT\>100\*109/L. 7. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. WHO type I squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma 2. Age \>65 or \<18 3. Prior malignancy (except adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) 4. Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy (except non-melanomatous skin cancers outside the intended RT treatment volume) 5. Patient is pregnant or lactating 6. Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose \>1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoL(quality of life)2 yearsChanges in quality of life were assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS (progression free survival)2 yearsfrom the first day of therapy to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever was first (according the criterion of RECIST 1.1 ).
OS (overall survival)2 yearsfrom the first day of therapy to death or last follow-up
LRRFS(Locoregional failure-free survival)2 yearsfrom the first day of therapy to the date of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
Adverse Events5 yearsParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 50 days and every 3 months thereafter for 5 years. Observe and record the toxicity profile (including but not limit to mucositis, liver and kidney function, et al.) according NCI-CTCAE 4.03 during the chemoradiation and follow-up.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026