Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant

Esthetic Zone Socket Shield Technique With Immediate Temporization vs. Conventional Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Temporization Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03587597

Enrollment

Registered

2018-07-16

Start date

2019-05-15

Completion date

2019-12-31

Last updated

2019-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preservation of the Labial Bone

Brief summary

eighteen implants will be placed in patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area.the recruited patients will be divided into two groups .group 1 will undergo socket shield technique with immediate temporization ,while group 2 will undergo conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. to compare bone loss and aesthetic outcomes in the two techniques.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsocket shield technique

socket shield technique with immediate temporization

PROCEDUREconventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization

conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

25 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth in the esthetic zone indicated for implant placement. * Both sexes. * No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology * No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

Exclusion criteria

* Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day. * Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Psychiatric problems * Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
implant stability	immediately after implant placement	implant stability will be measured using osstell device

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Amount of bone loss	after 3 month from implant insertion.	Will be measured using linear measurements from CBCT

Other

Measure	Time frame	Description
pink aesthetic score	immediately after implant placement and three month later	The gingival response to a anterior esthetic evaluation is assessed by the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) from clinical photography according to six variables scored from 0→2: 1. Mesial & distal papillae, 2. Keratinized gingiva, 3. Curvature of the gingival margin, 4. Level of the gingival margin, 5. Root convexity(torque), 6. Scar formation.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed Abd El Rahman, BDS

airplayer2003@yahoo.com01005261204

Backup Contactfatma el zahraa, BDS

fatatim@yahoo.com01006227753

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026