Skip to content

Total Mesorectal Excision(TME) With Lateral Lymph Node Dissection Versus TME After Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy

Total Mesorectal Excision(TME) With Lateral Lymph Node Dissection Versus TME After Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy of Lower Rectal Cancer With Suspected Local Lymph Node Metastasis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03587480
Acronym
TELEPHOME
Enrollment
250
Registered
2018-07-16
Start date
2018-12-17
Completion date
2030-05-24
Last updated
2022-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasm Malignant

Keywords

Low rectal cancer, Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT), lateral lymph node dissection (LLND)

Brief summary

Treatment for Low rectal cancer, especially in patients with regional lymph node metastasis are quite different between Japanese guideline (JSCCR) and western countries' guideline (NCCN, ESMO). While Japanese scholars advocate total mesorectal excision (TME) plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND), European and American scholars advocate TME alone after Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT), without the need of LLND. Accordingly, this clinical trial is designed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies for low rectal cancer with regional lymph node metastasis. It will provide high-level clinical evidence for the treatment of low rectal cancer with suspected local lymph node metastasis

Detailed description

There are significant differences between Japanese guidelines (JSCCR) and Western guidelines (NCCN, ESMO) in the treatment of low rectal cancer, especially in patients with regional lymph node metastasis. Japanese scholars advocated total meso rectal resection (TME) + Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND), However, European and American scholars advocate that only TME is used after new adjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT), without LLND. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical trial was to directly compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies for low rectal cancer with regional lymph node metastasis. This will provide a high level of clinical evidence for the treatment of low rectal cancer with suspected local lymph node metastasis

Interventions

PROCEDURETME+LLND

patients in TME+LLND group receive Lateral Lymph Node Dissection (LLND) after Total Mesorectal Excision(TME)

PROCEDURETME+nCRT

patients in TME+nCRT group receive Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) before Total Mesorectal Excision(TME)

Sponsors

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma(below the peritoneal reflection) Clinical stage Ⅲ 2. Tumor is capable of performing radical recession 3. No past history of chemotherapy, pelvic radiation of other cancers. 4. Written informed consent 5. Lower tumor margin is confirmed below the peritoneal reflection 6. Clinical state T(1-3)N(1-2)M0 is confirmed by the multiple disciplines team(MDT) including surgeons,diagnostic radiologist,radiation oncologist and medical oncologists base on MRI and endorectal ultrasound -

Exclusion criteria

1. Past history of other cancers 2. Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancers or Familial adenomatous polyposis(FAP) 3. Combine with inflammatory bowl disease(IBD) 4. Recurrence tumor or invade other organs 5. Combine with obstruction,perforation or bleeding which need emergency surgery. 6. Local tumor invade the external sphincter, levator ani muscle or adjacent organs 7. Participant join other clinical trials in 4 weeks. 8. American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) ≥Ⅳ and/or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) ≤2 9. Pregnant or lactating patients 10. Severity infection before operation 11. Psychological disorder 12. Severe dysfunction of organs or other contraindications 13. Cardiac infarction within six months 14. Severe pulmonary emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis 15. Doctor's decision for exclusion 16. Operative findings: Tumor invade other organs Lower tumor margin is above the peritoneal reflection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-year disease-free survivalFrom date of operation until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years36 months after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood lossOperation dayin the perioperative period
Incidence of sexual dysfunction3 yearsFrom the date of operation until the date of complication,assessed up to 3 years
Incidence of urinary dysfunction3 yearsFrom the date of operation until the date of complication,assessed up to 3 years
Incidence of defecation dysfunction3 yearsFrom the date of operation until the date of complication,assessed up to 3 years
Operative timeOperation dayOperation day
overall survivalFrom the date of operation until the date of death,assessed up to 5 years60 months after surgery
3-year local recurrence rateFrom date of operation until the date of local-recurrence (up to 3 years)36 months after surgery
5-year disease-free survivalFrom date of operation until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years60 months after surgery
the score of quality of life3 months after operationThe study investigate the quality of life using the WHOQOL Scale
incidence of Postoperative complications3 monthsFrom the date of operation until the date of complication,assessed up to 3 months

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYanxin Luo
luoyx25@mail.sysu.edu.cn020-38250745
Backup ContactShaoyong Peng
pengshy9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn86-13435613566

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026