Skip to content

The Impact of Soft Contact Lens Attributes on Symptoms Associated With Digital Eye Strain in Symptomatic Soft Contact Lens Wearers

The Impact of Soft Contact Lens Attributes on Symptoms Associated With Digital Eye Strain in Symptomatic Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03585790
Enrollment
45
Registered
2018-07-13
Start date
2018-09-13
Completion date
2018-11-02
Last updated
2020-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthenopia, Myopia

Keywords

Eye Fatigue

Brief summary

Despite its prevalence, the ocular causes of eye fatigue or unknown and may be related to the cornea/contact lens surface, the accommodative system, the convergence system, overall postural/muscle fatigue, or a combination of these or other causes. The current study aims to systematically investigate the incremental benefits in ameliorating eye fatigue.

Interventions

DEVICEContact lens with Multifocal Optics

This contact lens has optics to aid the accommodative and convergence systems

DEVICEContact lens with Single Vision Optics

This contact lens has standard single vision optics

Sponsors

Alcon Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Self-reported eye fatigue at least once per week attributable to digital device use with baseline. 2. Uses a digital device (phone, tablet, computer, etc) at least 4 hours per day 3. Mobile digital device with active data and text plan, able to receive email and text messages 4. Habitual 2-week or monthly silicone single vision hydrogel soft contact lens use; habitually wearing lenses for 6 or more hours per day for 5 or more days per week for the past 30 days 5. Habitual soft contact lens prescription optimized over-refraction within ±0.25 D 6. 18-35 years of age 7. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 8. Vertex corrected refractive cylinder must be -0.75 or less. 9. Visual acuity best correctable to 20/25 or better for each eye 10. The subject must read and sign the Informed Consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. A habitual wearer of any of the test lenses 2. Any active conditions that may prevent soft contact lens wear. 3. Any doctor diagnosed, self-reported ocular surface disease or dry eye requiring regular, ongoing treatment 4. Any doctor diagnosed, self-reported accommodative or binocular vision issues 5. History of issues of eye alignment or binocularity by self-report

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Reported Eye Fatigue1 weekSubjective Rating of Eye Fatigue, response to question How would you rate your overall eye fatigue/tiredness? on a 0-100 slider visual analog scale, where 0 represents 'Not Noticeable' and 100 represents 'Very Noticeable', with the numerical representation of their visual analog selection displayed to the right of the slider scale. Score reported is rating as described above.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Multifocal Optics First, Then Single Vision Optics
First Intervention (1 week) Second Intervention (1 week)
23
Single Vision Optics First, Then Multifocal Optics
First Intervention (1 week) Second Intervention (1 week)
22
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMultifocal Optics First, Then Single Vision OpticsSingle Vision Optics First, Then Multifocal OpticsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Age, Continuous21.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.37
22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.01
22.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.25
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants18 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants22 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants16 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Reported Eye Fatigue

Subjective Rating of Eye Fatigue, response to question How would you rate your overall eye fatigue/tiredness? on a 0-100 slider visual analog scale, where 0 represents 'Not Noticeable' and 100 represents 'Very Noticeable', with the numerical representation of their visual analog selection displayed to the right of the slider scale. Score reported is rating as described above.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: Outcome measures reported for both groups combined secondary to crossover design.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Multifocal Optics First, Then Single Vision OpticsSubject Reported Eye FatigueSingle Vision18 units on a scale
Multifocal Optics First, Then Single Vision OpticsSubject Reported Eye FatigueMultifocal17 units on a scale
Single Vision Optics First, Then Multifocal OpticsSubject Reported Eye FatigueSingle Vision21 units on a scale
Single Vision Optics First, Then Multifocal OpticsSubject Reported Eye FatigueMultifocal21.5 units on a scale
TotalSubject Reported Eye FatigueSingle Vision21 units on a scale
TotalSubject Reported Eye FatigueMultifocal20 units on a scale
Comparison: Ho: Single Vision - Multifocal \>= M vs. Ho: Single Vision - Multifocal \< M. Alpha = 0.05, two sided beta = 0.80p-value: 0.18t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026