Skip to content

Nursing Fro Laparoscopic vs. Open Hepatectomy

Comparison of Efficacy and Nursing Between Laparoscopic Hepatectomy and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03585166
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-07-12
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2018-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cancer, Liver Neoplasms

Keywords

Liver Cancer, laparoscopic hepatectomy, open hepatectomy

Brief summary

This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy (observation group) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (control group).Compared two groups of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, number of tumors (single/multiple), pathologic characteristics, HBsAg (positive/negative), liver function, AFP, Child - Pugh, grading, nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery (surgical incision length, intraoperative blood, intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume, operation time) the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation (death cases, for the first time the meal time, anus exhaust time, analgesic bed, first time, the abdominal cavity drainage tube time, length of hospital stay, postoperative days and liver function index.Follow-up: the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months, one year, two years, three years and five years.In this study, the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases, plus 20% inefficiencies, the final initial selection of 36 cases, and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases.The research date starts on October 1, 2017.

Detailed description

Research design and methods: This study was divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy (observation group) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (control group).Compared two groups of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, number of tumors (single/multiple), pathologic characteristics, HBsAg (positive/negative), liver function, AFP, Child - Pugh, grading, nursing method and comparison of two groups of patients after surgery (surgical incision length, intraoperative blood, intraoperative blood transfusion and transfusion volume, operation time) the number of cases of and postoperative rehabilitation (death cases, for the first time the meal time, anus exhaust time, analgesic bed, first time, the abdominal cavity drainage tube time, length of hospital stay, postoperative days and liver function index.Follow-up: the survival rates of the two groups were compared in six months, one year, two years, three years and five years.In this study, the initial selection of the minimum sample size of 30 cases, plus 20% inefficiencies, the final initial selection of 36 cases, and the later expansion of the sample size of 100 cases. Statistical methods: by means of SPSS 23.0 to analyze the data, all data after the normal test to choose the appropriate statistical methods, the normal distribution of measurement data in the two groups use surgery and postoperative recovery using two sets of samples t test, liver function index using analysis of variance, non-normal distribution using nonparametric test, count data chi-square test, P \< 0.05 for the difference was statistically significant.Survival analysis was performed on two groups of patients.The research date starts on October 1, 2017.

Interventions

PROCEDURElpaparoscopic hepatectomy

laparoscopic hepatectomy: laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

open hepatectomy: open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Sponsors

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Hepatocellular carcinoma There was no distant metastasis in patients with malignant tumors.

Exclusion criteria

primary tumor diameter \> 10cm Thrombosis of portal or inferior vena cava carcinoma Severe organic disease or cirrhosis of the liver Laparoscopic transposition of the abdomen Concomitant coagulant function abnormal patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of complications of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,The questionnaire surveyPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were hospitalized together on October 1, 2017 were studied at the time point before discharge.The incidence of complications, in percent
The survival rate of primary liver cancer treated by laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy,Telephone pays a return visit1 month after dischargeSurvival rate, percent

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the number of replacement drainage bags for primary hepatocellular carcinoma between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy, unit: numberPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Compare the number of times to replace the drainage bag, unit: number
Comparison of infusion days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer Unit: dayPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Infusion days, unit: days
Comparison of oxygen uptake days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer, unit: dayPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Oxygen uptake days, per day
Comparison between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma Unit: timesPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Number of subcutaneous injections Unit: times
Comparison of muscle injection times between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy in primary liver cancer: timesPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Muscle injections,Unit: times
Comparison of ecg monitoring days between laparoscopic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy for primary liver cancer Unit: dayPatients with liver cancer who are hospitalized on 1 October 2017 will be included in the study date.The study time is 1 year.Guardianship days, unit: days

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZeng Li
zengli2017@hust.edc.cn+86 15327374420
Backup ContactYe Lin
+86 13437145094

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026