Skip to content

Postoperative Pain Management in Rhinoplasty

Postoperative Pain Management in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03584152
Enrollment
159
Registered
2018-07-12
Start date
2019-08-09
Completion date
2025-07-17
Last updated
2025-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Postoperative pain, Rhinoplasty

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to determine adequacy of postoperative pain control after nasal surgery in patients prescribed Acetaminophen (325mg) + Hydrocodone (5mg) compared to Acetaminophen(325mg) + Ibuprofen (200mg)for a period of 5 days after nasal surgery. To assess the degree of pain, the participants will score the intensity of their pain on a visual analog scale(VAS)of 0-100points (0- no pain and 100- most severe pain), preoperatively and postoperatively (to be documented before each dose) for the duration of the prescribed medications . Additionally, the study will also seek to track: 1. The total number of pills each patients consume from the prescribed 5 day regimen. 2. Any associated side effects. 3. Additional pain medications prescribed in case of inadequate pain control, postoperatively.

Detailed description

From this study, the investigators hope to learn the following: 1. Is adequate postoperative pain management after nasal surgery achieved with opioid or non-opioid drugs? 2. If opioid drugs are required for adequate pain control postoperatively, is it possible to reduce the number of days the drugs are prescribed for? 3. What are the common side effect profiles of the included drugs? In light of the current opioid epidemic in the country, it is important the the physicians explore the utility of drugs other than opioids for adequate postoperative pain management. Also, reducing the dosage and/or number of prescribed opioid drugs lessens the propensity for misuse of physician prescribed opioid medications.

Interventions

Opioid Analgesics

DRUGTylenol 325Mg Caplet

Non opioid analgesics

Non opioid analgesics

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Minimum age of 18 years * Able to speak and understand english. * Undergoing rhinoplasty for cosmetic purposes * Undergoing rhinoplasty for treatment of nasal obstruction

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years of age * Cannot speak and understand english * Patients who have undergone nasal surgery in the past * Patients not undergoing nasal surgery * Women will be excluded if they are either pregnant or lactating as this population does not undergo nasal surgery at our center. * Patients with any known allergies to the class of pain medications used in the study. Please note: Any person interested in this clinical trial should contact the Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery clinic at (650) 736 - 3223 to schedule a consultation with Dr. Sam P. Most to assess their eligibility for the trial. Please note, enrolling in the clinical trial will not entitle the participant to a waiver of charges associated with undergoing nasal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 0-100 (0- no Pain and 100- Most Severe Pain)5 days post-operative [up to approximately 5 weeks post-baseline]Self reported pain intensity at every prescribed dose averaged over a period of 5 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Tramadol Doses Utilized5 days
Number Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain Control5 days
Side Effects of Pain Medications5 daysSelf reported side effects of prescribed medications according to response options. Participants may have reported more than one side-effect. Commonly experienced medication side-effects would not necessarily be considered to be adverse events.
Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireBaseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)The SCHNOS-O (obstructive) and SCHNOS-C (Cosmesis) scores were rated from 0 to 100 (higher scores correspond to worse obstruction or cosmesis). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.
Number of Study Drugs (Doses) Utilized5 daysUse of any study medication, excluding tramadol.
Visual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)Baseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)Patient's perceived aesthetic appearance was self-graded using a 10-cm-long visual analogue scale ('0' indicated 'completely dissatisfied with nasal appearance' and '10' indicated 'the highest possible satisfaction with nasal appearance'). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.
Eyelid Edema ScorePost-operative day 7Physician-assessed grading of eyelid edema. Score range: 0 to 4; higher numbers indicating more severe swelling.
Ecchymosis ScorePost-operative day 7Physician-assessed grading of periorbital ecchymosis extension. Score range: 0 to 4; higher numbers indicating more severe ecchymosis.
Subconjunctival Hemorrhage ScorePost-operative day 7Physician-assessed grading of subconjunctival hemorrhage. Score range: 0 to 2; higher numbers indicating more severe hemorrhage.
Visual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)Baseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)Patient's perceived severity of their nasal obstruction was self-graded using a 10-cm-long visual analogue scale ('0' indicated 'no nasal obstruction' and '10' indicated 'worst possible nasal obstruction). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from the day of the pre-operative appointment (approximately 2 to 4 weeks prior to procedure) through post-operative day 7. Follow-up data at two time points (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months) were obtained by chart review.

Pre-assignment details

159 signed informed consent and 141 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Drug Arm A
Norco 5mg-325 mg Tablet, administered orally every 4 hours for 5 days total.
65
Drug Arm B
Tylenol 325 mg Caplet, administered orally every 4 hours for 5 days total. Ibuprofen 200 mg administered orally every 4 hours for 5 days total.
65
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDiscontinued intervention74

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDrug Arm BDrug Arm ATotal
Age, Continuous33.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
30.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Latino/ Hispanic
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
45 Participants44 Participants89 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
65 Participants65 Participants130 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants48 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants17 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 650 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 0-100 (0- no Pain and 100- Most Severe Pain)

Self reported pain intensity at every prescribed dose averaged over a period of 5 days.

Time frame: 5 days post-operative [up to approximately 5 weeks post-baseline]

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm APain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 0-100 (0- no Pain and 100- Most Severe Pain)44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Drug Arm BPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 0-100 (0- no Pain and 100- Most Severe Pain)41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
p-value: 0.156t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Ecchymosis Score

Physician-assessed grading of periorbital ecchymosis extension. Score range: 0 to 4; higher numbers indicating more severe ecchymosis.

Time frame: Post-operative day 7

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Drug Arm AEcchymosis Score0 score on a scale
Drug Arm BEcchymosis Score0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.195Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Eyelid Edema Score

Physician-assessed grading of eyelid edema. Score range: 0 to 4; higher numbers indicating more severe swelling.

Time frame: Post-operative day 7

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Drug Arm AEyelid Edema Score0 score on a scale
Drug Arm BEyelid Edema Score0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.378Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Study Drugs (Doses) Utilized

Use of any study medication, excluding tramadol.

Time frame: 5 days

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm ANumber of Study Drugs (Doses) Utilized16 dosesStandard Deviation 9.5
Drug Arm BNumber of Study Drugs (Doses) Utilized19 dosesStandard Deviation 9.9
p-value: 0.112t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Tramadol Doses Utilized

Time frame: 5 days

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm ANumber of Tramadol Doses Utilized1 dosesStandard Deviation 2.5
Drug Arm BNumber of Tramadol Doses Utilized2.0 dosesStandard Deviation 3.7
p-value: 0.803t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain Control

Time frame: 5 days

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug Arm ANumber Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain ControlNo (not adequate)4 Participants
Drug Arm ANumber Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain ControlYes (adequate)61 Participants
Drug Arm BNumber Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain ControlNo (not adequate)2 Participants
Drug Arm BNumber Patients Who Reported Adequate Pain ControlYes (adequate)63 Participants
p-value: 0.403Chi-squared
Secondary

Side Effects of Pain Medications

Self reported side effects of prescribed medications according to response options. Participants may have reported more than one side-effect. Commonly experienced medication side-effects would not necessarily be considered to be adverse events.

Time frame: 5 days

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsItchiness14 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsBleeding30 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsConstipation22 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsHeadache9 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsNausea17 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsOther7 Participants
Drug Arm ASide Effects of Pain MedicationsDizziness41 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsOther3 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsNausea13 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsConstipation19 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsDizziness31 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsBleeding28 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsHeadache8 Participants
Drug Arm BSide Effects of Pain MedicationsItchiness2 Participants
Comparison: Difference between-groups in constipationp-value: 0.571Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference between-groups in nauseap-value: 0.405Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference between-groups in itchinessp-value: 0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Difference between-groups in dizzinessp-value: 0.078Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference between-groups in bleedingp-value: 0.724Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference between-groups in headachep-value: 0.795Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference between-groups in other side effectsp-value: 0.188Fisher Exact
Secondary

Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) Questionnaire

The SCHNOS-O (obstructive) and SCHNOS-C (Cosmesis) scores were rated from 0 to 100 (higher scores correspond to worse obstruction or cosmesis). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.

Time frame: Baseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm AStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireSCHNOS-O (pre-operative)40.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Drug Arm AStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireChange in SCHNOS-O (post-operative)-25.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Drug Arm AStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireSCHNOS-C (pre-operative)54.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
Drug Arm AStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireChange in SCHNOS-C (post-operative)-39.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
Drug Arm BStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireChange in SCHNOS-C (post-operative)-36.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.2
Drug Arm BStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireSCHNOS-O (pre-operative)41.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.1
Drug Arm BStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireSCHNOS-C (pre-operative)54.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Drug Arm BStandardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) QuestionnaireChange in SCHNOS-O (post-operative)-23.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.9
Comparison: Difference in change in SCHNOS-Op-value: 0.7318t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Difference in change in SCHNOS-Cp-value: 0.5267t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Subconjunctival Hemorrhage Score

Physician-assessed grading of subconjunctival hemorrhage. Score range: 0 to 2; higher numbers indicating more severe hemorrhage.

Time frame: Post-operative day 7

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Drug Arm ASubconjunctival Hemorrhage Score0 score on a scale
Drug Arm BSubconjunctival Hemorrhage Score0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.682Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)

Patient's perceived aesthetic appearance was self-graded using a 10-cm-long visual analogue scale ('0' indicated 'completely dissatisfied with nasal appearance' and '10' indicated 'the highest possible satisfaction with nasal appearance'). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.

Time frame: Baseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm AVisual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)Pre-operative3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Drug Arm AVisual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)Post-operative (change)-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Drug Arm BVisual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)Pre-operative3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Drug Arm BVisual Analog Scale-Aesthetic (VAS-A)Post-operative (change)-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Comparison: Difference in change in VAS-Ap-value: 0.5351t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)

Patient's perceived severity of their nasal obstruction was self-graded using a 10-cm-long visual analogue scale ('0' indicated 'no nasal obstruction' and '10' indicated 'worst possible nasal obstruction). Not all 130 patients had a postoperative score at both time follow-up intervals (\<6 months, and ≥ 6 months, obtained by chart review), thus a mean postoperative score (SD) was calculated for each treatment group accounting for both intervals.

Time frame: Baseline and post-operative follow-up (up to an average of 12 months following procedure)

Population: Participants who completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug Arm AVisual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)Pre-operative4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Drug Arm AVisual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)Post-operative (change)-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Drug Arm BVisual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)Pre-operative4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Drug Arm BVisual Analog Scale-Functional (VAS-F)Post-operative (change)-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Comparison: Difference in change in VAS-Fp-value: 0.9158t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026