Skip to content

Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

Early Intervention for Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion: Randomized Controlled Trial for Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03583931
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-07-12
Start date
2018-07-26
Completion date
2020-02-02
Last updated
2022-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coagulopathy, Empyema, Pleural, Parapneumonic Effusion

Keywords

VATS Decortication, Surgical Pleural Decortication, Fibrinolytic Therapy, Pneumonia, Thoracostomy

Brief summary

This study aims to standardize the treatment of pleural space (parapneumonic) infections by comparing the difference in outcomes between 2 methods of treatment: early VATS (Video Assisted Thorascopic Surgery) decortication versus fibrinolytic therapy. During treatment, the patient's coagulopathy status will also be evaluated.

Detailed description

The treatment of parapneumonic infections (infection in the pleural space) at the Denver Health Medical Center is not standardized, and timing for advanced interventions such as fibrinolytic therapy or surgical decortication remain unclear. The definitive treatment strategy in these patients may be sub-optimal, and lead to prolonged hospitalization and morbidity. This is concerning as the mortality rate of community acquired pneumonia triples in the presence of a parapneumonic process (5-15%) and can reach over 25% if it becomes bilateral(1). Prompt recognition of pleural space infections is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality. This is attributable to the progression of the disease from a simple fluid collection amenable to pleural space drainage, to necrotizing empyema requiring thoracotomy decortication and open drainage. The keys to management of parapneumonic effusions are early diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic intervention, and recognition of failure of conservative management. The investigators propose that a standardized pathway for identifying and treating parapneumonic effusions will be an important quality improvement. A key gap in the literature remains if patients with parapneumonic infections that cannot be drained with a chest tube should undergo a trial in intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, or if they should go directly to video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for decortication of all infectious material.

Interventions

Surgical procedure to unroof all located collections of the pleural space through a chest wall incision

Instillation of DNAse and tPA together through patient's chest tube already in placed to break down complex fluid collection in the pleural space. DNAse and tPA are are administered together only i.e. are not mutually exclusive.

Sponsors

Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years old and older * Admitted with pleural effusion that undergoes thoracentesis by medical/pulmonary service * Pleural fluid pH \<7.3 * SICU placed chest tube * Subsequent transfer to SICU

Exclusion criteria

* Existing malignancy * Malignant cells from initial pleural fluid sample * End stage liver disease (Child's B or greater) * Coagulopathy * Unable to tolerate surgical procedure * Frank purulent drainage (needs OR regardless) * Recent surgery of abdomen or thorax precluding the use of tPA * Baseline neurologic impairment requiring a proxy for consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Length of StayFrom patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.How long the patient remains admitted in the hospital during their index hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU Free DaysFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.Admission days during index hospitalization that are of a lower acuity of care than intensive care
Chest Tube DaysFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.Days with chest tube in place after intervention
Cost of Admission and TreatmentFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.Cost of care for the patient after their intervention
Pain ScoreFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.What the patient's level of pain is from 0 to 10; zero being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable. score is categorical 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 or 10.
Chest Tube DrainageFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.The amount and character of the drainage from the chest tube after intervention
Fever DaysFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.The amount of days it takes to resolve fever (temp \>100.4)
Supplemental Oxygen DaysFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.The amount of time the patient needs to warn off any supplemental oxygen
Days of AntibioticsFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.The number of days antibiotics are required after intervention
Elevated White Blood Count DaysFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.The amount of days it takes to resolve a leukocytosis
Changed in Coagulopathic StatusFrom admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.Changes in laboratory TEG values after intervention
Incentive SpirometryEveryday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.To what volume the patient can inspire using an incentive spirometer

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Prospective randomized clinical trial of hospitalized patients identified to have complicated parapneumonic effusions with radiographic imaging. Denver Health and Hospital Authority.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Operative VATS Decortication
Operative group that will undergo early VATS decortication of complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema VATS Decortication: Surgical procedure to unroof all located collections of the pleural space through a chest wall incision
5
Non-operative Fibrinolytic Therapy
Non-operative group that will undergo instillation of the drugs DNAse and tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) together i.e. 5mg DNAse and 10mg tPA twice a day for up to six doses, through chest tube as treatment of the patient's complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema. Fibrinolytic therapy = DNAse + tPA; these medications are not mutually exclusive. Fibrinolytic Therapy: Instillation of DNAse and tPA together through patient's chest tube already in placed to break down complex fluid collection in the pleural space. DNAse and tPA are are administered together only i.e. are not mutually exclusive.
5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOperative VATS DecorticationNon-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 51 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 51 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 52 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Hospital Length of Stay

How long the patient remains admitted in the hospital during their index hospitalization

Time frame: From patient's admission to hospital to their discharge, (excluding extended stay due to social work reasons) up to 28 days or discharge, which ever comes first.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationHospital Length of Stay12.4 daysStandard Deviation 16.7
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyHospital Length of Stay8.4 daysStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Changed in Coagulopathic Status

Changes in laboratory TEG values after intervention

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: No participants were analyzed on this measure in the final analysis, because the data were not collected.

Secondary

Chest Tube Days

Days with chest tube in place after intervention

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationChest Tube Days7.4 DaysStandard Deviation 8.2
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyChest Tube Days8.2 DaysStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: 0.84ANOVA
Secondary

Chest Tube Drainage

The amount and character of the drainage from the chest tube after intervention

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: Incomplete analysis documented in records on this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationChest Tube Drainage60.1 mLStandard Deviation 12.3
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyChest Tube Drainage713.2 mLStandard Deviation 180.3
Secondary

Cost of Admission and Treatment

Cost of care for the patient after their intervention

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: The data were not collected

Secondary

Days of Antibiotics

The number of days antibiotics are required after intervention

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationDays of Antibiotics17 DaysStandard Deviation 9.3
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyDays of Antibiotics25.6 DaysStandard Deviation 24.6
p-value: 0.45ANOVA
Secondary

Elevated White Blood Count Days

The amount of days it takes to resolve a leukocytosis

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationElevated White Blood Count Days5.6 DaysStandard Deviation 4
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyElevated White Blood Count Days6 DaysStandard Deviation 3.6
p-value: 0.87ANOVA
Secondary

Fever Days

The amount of days it takes to resolve fever (temp \>100.4)

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationFever Days4.8 DaysStandard Deviation 5.3
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyFever Days0.8 DaysStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.25ANOVA
Secondary

ICU Free Days

Admission days during index hospitalization that are of a lower acuity of care than intensive care

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationICU Free Days22.4 DaysStandard Deviation 8
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyICU Free Days20 DaysStandard Deviation 6.2
p-value: 0.61ANOVA
Secondary

Incentive Spirometry

To what volume the patient can inspire using an incentive spirometer

Time frame: Everyday for 5 days post study intervention, from admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: No participants were analyzed on this measure in the final analysis, because the data were not collected.

Secondary

Pain Score

What the patient's level of pain is from 0 to 10; zero being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable. score is categorical 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 or 10.

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: The pain score was provided at the discharge date or at 28 days of admission (whichever came first).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationPain Score3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapyPain Score4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Supplemental Oxygen Days

The amount of time the patient needs to warn off any supplemental oxygen

Time frame: From admission to discharge, or for 28 days, whichever comes first.

Population: All 10 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Operative VATS DecorticationSupplemental Oxygen Days17.8 DaysStandard Deviation 24.5
Non-operative Fibrinolytic TherapySupplemental Oxygen Days9.6 DaysStandard Deviation 2.3
p-value: 0.48ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026