Skip to content

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia, Age 0 to < 60 Months

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03583697
Enrollment
75
Registered
2018-07-11
Start date
2018-06-13
Completion date
2022-01-26
Last updated
2024-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achondroplasia

Keywords

Dwarfism, Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental, ACH, Natriuretic Peptide, C-Type, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Natriuretic Agents, Physiological Effect of Drugs, Skeletal Dysplasias, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Osteochondrodysplasias

Brief summary

Study 111-206 is a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of BMN 111 in infants and young children with a diagnosis of achondroplasia.

Interventions

Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg/day and/or 30 μg/kg/day of BMN 111 daily, subject to adjustment per protocol

DRUGPlacebo

Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg of placebo daily, Subject to adjustment per protocol

Sponsors

BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of achondroplasia (ACH), confirmed by genetic testing. If subjects had previous genetic testing, subjects must have a lab report from a certified laboratory with the study specific mutation documented. 2. Age 0 to \< 60 months, at study entry (Day 1) 3. Cohort 1 and 2 subjects must have at least a 6-month period of pretreatment growth assessment in Study 111 901 immediately before screening, and have one documented measurement of height/body length a minimum of 6 months prior to the screening visit for 111-206. Cohort 3 subjects must have a minimum of 3 months of observation prior to treatment. This observational period can be obtained either (1) via prior enrollment in Study 111-901 or (2) via enrollment in this Study 111 206 for a minimum of 3 months of non-treatment observation prior to commencement of treatment. 4. Parent(s) or guardian(s) (and the subjects themselves, if required by local regulations or ethics committee) are willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure 5. Willing and able to perform all study procedures as physically possible 6. Parent(s) or caregiver(s) are willing to administer daily injections to the subjects and complete the required training

Exclusion criteria

1. Have hypochondroplasia or short-stature condition other than achondroplasia (e.g., trisomy 21, pseudoachondroplasia, etc.) 2. Subject weighs \< 5.0 kg (Cohort 1 and 2) or \< 4.0 kg (Cohort 3) 3. Have any of the following: * Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism * Insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus * Autoimmune inflammatory disease (including celiac disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, scleroderma, etc.) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Autonomic neuropathy 4. Have a history of any of the following: * Renal insufficiency defined as serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL * Chronic anemia or Hgb \<10.0 g/dL (based on screening clinical laboratory testing) * Baseline systolic blood pressure (BP) below age and gender specified normal range or recurrent symptomatic hypotension (defined as episodes of low BP generally accompanied by symptoms e.g., dizziness, fainting) or recurrent symptomatic orthostatic hypotension * Cardiac or vascular disease, including the following * Cardiac dysfunction (abnormal echocardiogram determined to be clinically significant by principal investigator PI and medical monitor) at Screening Visit * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Pulmonary hypertension * Congenital heart disease with ongoing cardiac dysfunction * Cerebrovascular disease * Aortic insufficiency or other clinically significant valvular dysfunction * Clinically significant atrial or ventricular arrhythmias 5. Have a clinically significant finding or arrhythmia that indicates abnormal cardiac function or conduction or Fridericia's corrected QT interval (QTc-F) \>450 msec on screening ECG 6. Have evidence of cervicomedullary compression (CMC) likely to require surgical intervention within 60 days of Screening as determined by the Investigator based on the following assessments * Physical exam (e.g., neurologic findings of clonus, opisthotonus, exaggerated reflexes, dilated facial veins) * Polysomnography (e.g., severe central sleep apnea) * MRI indicating presence of severe CMC or spinal cord damage 7. Have an unstable medical condition likely to require surgical intervention in the next 6 months, or planned spine or long-bone surgery (i.e., surgery involving significant disruption of bone cortex) during the study period 8. Have documented uncorrected Vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D \<=15 ng/mL (37.5 nmol/L) 9. Require any other investigational product prior to completion of the study period 10. Have received another investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to the Screening visit 11. Have used any other investigational product or investigational medical device for the treatment of achondroplasia or short stature at any time 12. Require current chronic therapy with antihypertensive medication or any medication that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise the safety or ability of the subject to participate in this clinical study (Table 9.3.5.1) 13. Have been treated with growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), or anabolic steroids in the 6 months prior to screening, or long-term treatment (\>3 months) at any time 14. Have had regular long-term treatment (\> 1 month) with oral corticosteroids (low-dose ongoing inhaled steroid for asthma, or intranasal steroids, are acceptable) in the 12 months prior to screening 15. Have ever had cervicomedullary decompression surgery (Cohorts 2 and 3 only), spine or long-bone surgery (i.e., surgery involving disruption of bone cortex) or have ever had bone-related surgery with chronic complications NOTE: Subjects with prior cervicomedullary decompression may be allowed into Cohort 1 only after discussion and agreement with Medical Monitor. 16. Have ever had limb-lengthening surgery or plan to have limb-lengthening surgery during the study period 17. Have had a fracture of the long bones or spine within 6 months prior to screening 18. Have aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or total bilirubin greater than upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening (except for subjects with a known history of Gilberts or newborns entering screening in Cohort 3) 19. Have evidence of severe untreated sleep apnea; or have newly initiated sleep apnea treatment (eg, Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or sleep apnea-mitigating surgery) in the 2 months prior to screening 20. Have current malignancy, history of malignancy, or currently under work-up for suspected malignancy 21. Have known hypersensitivity to BMN 111 or its excipients 22. Have a history of hip surgery or severe hip dysplasia 23. Have a history of clinically significant hip injury in the 30 days prior to screening 24. Have a history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head 25. Have abnormal findings on baseline clinical hip exam or imaging assessments that are determined to be clinically significant as determined by the Investigator 26. Have a condition or circumstance that, in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at high risk for poor treatment compliance or for not completing the study 27. Have any concurrent disease or condition that, in the view of the Investigator, would interfere with study participation or safety evaluations, for any reason Inclusion Criteria for Cohort 3 Observation Period 1. Parent(s) or guardian(s) willing and able to provide signed informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure. Also, willing and able to provide written assent (if applicable) after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure. 2. Birth to \<= 3 months of age at study entry. 3. Have ACH, documented by genetic testing 4. Are willing and able to perform all study procedures as physically possible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)A treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any Adverse Events that newly appeared, increased in frequency or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug administration. A severity grade was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. As per CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE. Safety Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in this study. Serious adverse event (SAE)
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.Baseline to Week 52Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDS) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A height Z score of 0 would indicate that the subject's height is equal to the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. A positive height Z score indicates that the subjects height is above the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age, whilst a negative height Z score indicates that the subjects height is below the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. To conclude if the height Z score increases then this means the height deficit has decreased. standard deviation score (SDS). The primary efficacy analysis population was the subset of randomized participants in the FAS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52Baseline to Week 52As a general rule, standing height/sitting height was used if participants were aged \>= 24 months at baseline. Body length/crown to rump was used if participants were aged \< 24 months at baseline. If body length was not measured and standing height was available, standing height was used.
Change From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52AGV was derived over 12-month intervals starting from the baseline visit. Annualized growth velocity (AGV) = Standing Height at Date 2 - Standing Height at Date 1/Interval Length (Days) x 365.25. Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.
Change From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Upper to Lower Body ratio=Sitting Height / (Standing Height - Sitting Height).
Change From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Change from baseline in other growth measures (upper body length, head circumference, arm span, upper arm length, lower arm (Forearm) length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length (Thigh), knee to heel length, and tibial length) at Week 52. Participants aged \<24 months, body length and crown to rump length take precedence over standing height and sitting height. Participants aged \<24 months at baseline and \>=24 months at Week 52, body length and crown to rump length take precedence.
Change From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52For Height: subjects aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Subjects aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Body Mass Index (BMI): For height used for BMI calculation, participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Change From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The body mass index (BMI) Z-score represents the participant's BMI converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean BMI for age and sex of the reference population. A positive BMI Z-score means BMI is above the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative BMI Z-Score means BMI is below the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age. BMI Z-scores are derived only for participants aged 24 months or older, the change from baseline to Week 52 in BMI Z-score is summarized for Cohort 1 only as no participants in Cohort 2 or Cohort 3 were 24 months at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The weight Z-score represents the participant's weight converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean weight for age and sex of the reference population. A positive weight Z-score means weight is above the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative weight Z-Score means weight is below the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age.
Change From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Baseline to Week 5297(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 52Baseline to Week 5297(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52Baseline to Week 5297(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global behaviour. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 5297(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global health perceptions. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo and Cohort 3 vosoritide are 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 5297(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global change in health. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The Pediatric Functional Independence Measure-II (WeeFIM®-II) is designed to measure functional independence of children between the ages of 6 months & 18 yrs who have physical or general developmental limitations. The WeeFIM-II is comprised of 3 domains that are rated by clinicians based on information obtained from parents/caregivers (self-care \[score range 8 to 56\], mobility \[score range 8 to 35\], & cognition \[score range 8 to 35\]) & provides a total score between 18 (worst) & 126 (Best). Higher score reflects higher level of independence. Performance of a child on each of individual items within WeeFIM is assigned to one of seven levels on an ordinal scale that represent function from complete & modified independence (levels 7 & 6) without a helping person to modified & complete dependence (levels 5 to 1) with a helping person. Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM-II) is only validated in children ages 6 months to 18 yrs. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Change From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Baseline to Week 52BSID-III is performance-based clinician-reported outcome assessment for use in children from 1 to 42 months (1 month to 3.5 years). individually administered by the trained clinician to the participant/child Scales include Cognitive subscale, Receptive and Expressive subscales, and Gross and Fine Motor subscales. The two language scales make up a composite Language Scale score and the Gross and Fine Motor subscales yield a composite Motor Scale score. In addition, there is a Social-Emotional Scale and Adaptive Behavior Scale, which is a questionnaire read and completed by parent or caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 2, and indicate mastery (2), emerging (1) or zero (not present) Each (sub)scale yields a total raw score, standardized according to the participant's chronological age (scaled scores)
Change From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The CBCL is used as a screening tool for emotional or behavioral problems, measuring initial behavior severity, tracking changes in behavioral problems over the course of treatment, and treatment planning. The CBCL 1.5-5 years old consists of 100 questions, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=Not True (as far as you know), 1= Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2=Very True or Often True). The scores for each individual question within a domain are summed to give a domain score. The CBCL uses a normative sample to create standard scores, which are scaled so that 50 is average with a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate more emotional or behavioral issues. CBCL was waived for children \< 18 months old. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Baseline to Week 52 End point timeframe:
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Baseline to Week 52Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.
Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
Changes From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Percentages were calculated using the total number of subjects in the safety population (N for each treatment group) as the denominator. All increases are comparing results at Week 52 relative to the baseline assessment.
MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Baseline to Week 52
MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Baseline to Week 52
MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelBaseline to Week 52
MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelBaseline to Week 52
MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusBaseline to Week 52
MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusBaseline to Week 52
Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)Baseline to Week 52
DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Baseline to Week 52
DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMCBaseline to Week 52
DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMCBaseline to Week 52
DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMDBaseline to Week 52
DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMDBaseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Whole Body BMD Z-scoreBaseline to Week 52Hologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMD Z-Score. Change in whole body bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A whole body BMD Z-score \<-2 SD can indicate low bone density in children. The Whole Body BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD to the average bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis.
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-ScoreBaseline to Week 52Hologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score Change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants lumbar spine BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A BMD Z-score \<-2 SD can indicate low bone density in the lumbar spine in children. The Lumbar Spine BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD in the lumbar spine to the average spinal bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis of the spine.
Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsAt Day 1, Week 3, Week 13, Week 26, Week 52, & Ever Positive.Number of participants with Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled Visits for : total antibody (TAb), Neutralizing antibodies (NAb), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) & C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). TAb Titer Positive, NAb Titer Positive, ANP Reactivity Positive, BNP Reactivity Positive & CNP Reactivity Positive. Day 1 is the baseline assessment result taken prior to first dose of study drug. Ever Positive = the number of participants with at least one positive sample result.
Biomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeAt Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.
Biomarker: Type II Collagen C-Telopeptides Normalized for Creatinine (CTX-II)Baseline to Week 52.
Biomarker: Plasma Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) Change From Pre-Dose to Maximum Post-Dose at Week 52Week 52 Pre-Dose to Week 52 Maximum Post-Dose.
Biomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMAt Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.Laboratory results up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation were included. Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.
Change in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Sleep-testing device was used to assess presence & severity of sleep-disordered breathing by measurement of blood oxygen(O2)saturation,pulse rate,& airflow during overnight monitoring Episodes(Epi) of sleep apnea variables summarized as: Number(No.)of epi of apnea/hr(AI);No.of epi of hypopnea/hr(HI);No.of epi of obstructive apnea hypopneas/hr(AHI);No.of epi of obstructive apneas/hr(Obstructive Apnea Index);No.of epi of central apneas/hr(CAI);No.of desaturations/hr \>=3% AHI is a marker of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), scored as No.of apnea or hypopnea epi/hr, with AHI \<=1/hr normal, 1\< AHI\<=5 mild,5\< AHI \<=10 moderate,& AHI\>10/hr severe OSA. CAI reflects cervical cord compression at cervical-medullary junction, & is No. of epi of a pause in ventilation with no associated respiratory effort, with\> 5 epi/hr abnormal.O2 desaturation index measures average No. of desaturation epi/hr, defined as decrease in O2 saturation of \>=3% for at least 10sec, with(\<8/hr normal & \>=8/hr abnormal
PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞ excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Baseline to Week 52
PK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.
PK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
PK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. V/F excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
PK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.
PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52Baseline to Week 52

Countries

Australia, Japan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multi-center study conducted by 16 principal investigators at 16 study centers in four countries (United States, Australia, United Kingdom and Japan).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 75 participants (full analysis set \[FAS\]) were enrolled into the study, of which 11 participants were enrolled to receive vosoritide (sentinel participants). 64 participants were blinded and randomized to receive vosoritide or placebo (32 randomized for vosoritide and 32 for placebo), which constituted the FAS (randomized).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sentinel
Cohort 1 Sentinel: Participants stratified by age \>= 24 to \< 60 months, received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=4) Cohort 2 Sentinel: Participants stratified by age \>= 6 to \< 24 months, received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day & 30 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=4) Cohort 3 Sentinel: Participants stratified by age 0 to \< 6 months, received vosoritide 30 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=3)
11
Randomized Vosoritide
Cohort 1: Participants stratified by age \>= 24 to \< 60 months, received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=15) Cohort 2: Participants stratified by age \>= 6 to \< 24 months, received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day & 30 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=8) Cohort 3: Participants stratified by age 0 to \< 6 months, received vosoritide 30 µg/kg/day single daily subcutaneous injection (n=9)
32
Randomized Placebo
Cohort 1: Participants stratified by age \>= 24 to \< 60 months, received placebo single daily subcutaneous injection (n=16) Cohort 2: Participants stratified by age \>= 6 to \< 24 months, received placebo single daily subcutaneous injection (n=8) Cohort 3: Participants stratified by age 0 to \< 6 months, received placebo single daily subcutaneous injection (n=8)
32
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAE of sudden infant death syndrome, not related010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRandomized VosoritideRandomized PlaceboTotalSentinel
Age, Continuous23.0 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9
26.5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
24.5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
24.71 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.79
BMI19.48 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
20.14 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
19.85 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.34
20.06 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.87
BMI Z-Score2.52 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15
2.77 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
2.67 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
2.79 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants29 Participants69 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Japanese
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Other
6 Participants2 Participants9 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
21 Participants25 Participants54 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants19 Participants37 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants13 Participants38 Participants8 Participants
Weight10.20 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83
10.55 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31
10.34 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.98
10.12 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Weight Z-Score-1.49 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
-1.59 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44
-1.52 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
-1.41 Z-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 321 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 3243 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 323 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.

Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDS) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A height Z score of 0 would indicate that the subject's height is equal to the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. A positive height Z score indicates that the subjects height is above the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age, whilst a negative height Z score indicates that the subjects height is below the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. To conclude if the height Z score increases then this means the height deficit has decreased. standard deviation score (SDS). The primary efficacy analysis population was the subset of randomized participants in the FAS.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS \& FAS (randomized) population:The FAS (randomized) was a subset of the FAS, which included 64 participants who were randomized to study treatment (32 participants randomized to vosoritide \& 32 participants randomized to placebo).~This is model-based analysis, it is true that the participants analyzed for placebo FAS \& FAS (randomized) are the same, but participants analyzed for vosoritide arm FAS \& FAS(randomized) are different, that's why the model-based results for placebo are different

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
SentinelChange From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.-0.06 Z-score
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.-0.31 Z-score
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.0.01 Z-score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.-0.30 Z-score
Comparison: Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDs) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.~Participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.~Difference in least squares (LS) means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [-0.02, 0.53]
Comparison: Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDs) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.~Participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.~Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [0.07, 0.54]
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any Adverse Events that newly appeared, increased in frequency or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug administration. A severity grade was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. As per CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE. Safety Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in this study. Serious adverse event (SAE)

Time frame: Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)

Population: Safety Population: The Safety Population was a subset of the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE11 Participants
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any SAE0 Participants
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related AE8 Participants
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related SAEs0 Participants
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE of CTCAE grade >=30 Participants
SentinelNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who died0 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who died1 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE32 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE of CTCAE grade >=32 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any SAE3 Participants
Randomized VosoritideNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related AE29 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any SAE6 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related AE17 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants who died0 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any treatment-related SAEs0 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE32 Participants
Randomized PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Participants with any AE of CTCAE grade >=33 Participants
Secondary

Biomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BM

Laboratory results up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation were included. Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.

Time frame: At Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.

Population: Safety Population.~Change from baseline was based on subjects with available measurements at both timepoints.Overall no. of participants analyzed(N) is greater than no. analyzed for All Vosoritide, as different participants missed for different timepoints(Ex:1 of 42 participants who were part of CNP Col X BM:Baseline was not present in 42 participants who participated in CNP Col X BM:Day 8.Therefore, n for CNP Col X BM:Baseline \& CNP Col X BM:Day 8 are 42 however, overall no of subjects,N=43)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 3912249.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5056.5
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 2012833.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4581.9
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 392362.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5752.9
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 63400.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4554.6
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Baseline9833.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3444.7
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 202928.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4385.9
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Day 812093.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4443.8
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 613456.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4763.3
SentinelBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Day 82139.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3871.9
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 69464.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4243.3
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Day 81391.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3354.2
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 6200.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3867.5
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 2012064.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5277.3
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 202435.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4666.9
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Week 399932.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4004.4
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Change from baseline to Week 39946.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3490.1
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Baseline9555.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4016.7
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone and Collagen Metabolism Biomarker Over Time-CNP Col X BMCNP Col X BM: Day 810017.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3831.2
Secondary

Biomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) Overtime

Time frame: At Baseline, Day 8, Week 6, Week 20, & Week 39.

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 6130.38 U/LStandard Deviation 140.08
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 20109.67 U/LStandard Deviation 30.88
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Day 8-19.39 U/LStandard Deviation 202.9
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 20-7.21 U/LStandard Deviation 96.94
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Baseline140.28 U/LStandard Deviation 183.23
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 39108.49 U/LStandard Deviation 32.02
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Day 8122.32 U/LStandard Deviation 99.09
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 39-12.21 U/LStandard Deviation 105.04
SentinelBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 62.63 U/LStandard Deviation 218.6
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 3995.41 U/LStandard Deviation 352.78
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Day 8104.12 U/LStandard Deviation 29.12
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Day 8-7.67 U/LStandard Deviation 17.53
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 6109.46 U/LStandard Deviation 29.04
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Baseline113.43 U/LStandard Deviation 33.56
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 6-6.17 U/LStandard Deviation 24.32
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 20104.46 U/LStandard Deviation 29.69
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Change from baseline to Week 20-11.32 U/LStandard Deviation 18.19
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) OvertimeBSAP: Week 39208.13 U/LStandard Deviation 363.56
Secondary

Biomarker: Plasma Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) Change From Pre-Dose to Maximum Post-Dose at Week 52

Time frame: Week 52 Pre-Dose to Week 52 Maximum Post-Dose.

Population: Safety population. Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelBiomarker: Plasma Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) Change From Pre-Dose to Maximum Post-Dose at Week 5239.079 nMStandard Deviation 25.706
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Plasma Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) Change From Pre-Dose to Maximum Post-Dose at Week 529.460 nMStandard Deviation 26.307
Secondary

Biomarker: Type II Collagen C-Telopeptides Normalized for Creatinine (CTX-II)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52.

Population: Safety Population~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is the last measurement prior to the initiation of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelBiomarker: Type II Collagen C-Telopeptides Normalized for Creatinine (CTX-II)-9364.7 ng/ mmol CrStandard Deviation 65244.1
Randomized VosoritideBiomarker: Type II Collagen C-Telopeptides Normalized for Creatinine (CTX-II)-7607.6 ng/ mmol CrStandard Deviation 54614.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52

AGV was derived over 12-month intervals starting from the baseline visit. Annualized growth velocity (AGV) = Standing Height at Date 2 - Standing Height at Date 1/Interval Length (Days) x 365.25. Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS (randomized) Population and FAS population.~This is model-based analysis, it is true that the participants analyzed for placebo FAS \& FAS (randomized) are the same, but participants analyzed for vosoritide arm FAS \& FAS (randomized) are different, that's why the model-based results for placebo are different.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
SentinelChange From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52-2.17 cm/year
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52-2.95 cm/year
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52-2.41 cm/year
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52-3.32 cm/year
95% CI: [0.02, 1.54]
Comparison: Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [0.24, 1.59]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52

BSID-III is performance-based clinician-reported outcome assessment for use in children from 1 to 42 months (1 month to 3.5 years). individually administered by the trained clinician to the participant/child Scales include Cognitive subscale, Receptive and Expressive subscales, and Gross and Fine Motor subscales. The two language scales make up a composite Language Scale score and the Gross and Fine Motor subscales yield a composite Motor Scale score. In addition, there is a Social-Emotional Scale and Adaptive Behavior Scale, which is a questionnaire read and completed by parent or caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 2, and indicate mastery (2), emerging (1) or zero (not present) Each (sub)scale yields a total raw score, standardized according to the participant's chronological age (scaled scores)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score-5.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score-2.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score4.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score-4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score-2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score12.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score6.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score16.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score3.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score17.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score3.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score1.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score5.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score7.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score-13.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score5.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score-7.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language composite score-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Motor Composite Score11.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Receptive communication language scaled score0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive scaled score2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Language sum of scaled score-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Expressive communication language scaled score-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Gross motor scaled score0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Fine motor scaled score2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52Cognitive composite score10.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52 End point timeframe:

Population: Safety Population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.06
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio-0.05 RatioStandard Deviation 0.06
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio-0.05 RatioStandard Deviation 0.05
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52Left Tibia Bowing Angle-0.97 DegreesStandard Deviation 5.88
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52Right Tibia Bowing Angle-2.34 DegreesStandard Deviation 5.37
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52Left Tibia Bowing Angle1.07 DegreesStandard Deviation 5.38
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52Right Tibia Bowing Angle-0.93 DegreesStandard Deviation 5.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.04
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length(cm) Ratio-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.05
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio-0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.04
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length(cm) Ratio-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.04
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Tibia Length1.96 cmStandard Deviation 0.57
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Fibula Length2.00 cmStandard Deviation 0.61
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Fibula Length2.00 cmStandard Deviation 0.64
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Tibia Length1.92 cmStandard Deviation 0.55
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Distance Between Ankle Joint and Distal Growth Plate of Fibula-0.02 cmStandard Deviation 0.23
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Distance Between Ankle Joint and Distal Growth Plate of Fibula-0.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.23
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Lower Extremity6.02 cmStandard Deviation 6.67
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Lower Extremity6.08 cmStandard Deviation 6.54
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Femur Length2.29 cmStandard Deviation 0.58
SentinelChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Femur Length2.35 cmStandard Deviation 0.49
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Lower Extremity4.26 cmStandard Deviation 1.85
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Tibia Length1.68 cmStandard Deviation 0.77
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Distance Between Ankle Joint and Distal Growth Plate of Fibula0.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.22
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Fibula Length1.97 cmStandard Deviation 0.69
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Femur Length2.20 cmStandard Deviation 0.73
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Right Fibula Length1.89 cmStandard Deviation 0.75
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Lower Extremity3.87 cmStandard Deviation 1.56
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Tibia Length1.69 cmStandard Deviation 0.7
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Femur Length2.01 cmStandard Deviation 0.62
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52Left Distance Between Ankle Joint and Distal Growth Plate of Fibula0.07 cmStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52

The body mass index (BMI) Z-score represents the participant's BMI converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean BMI for age and sex of the reference population. A positive BMI Z-score means BMI is above the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative BMI Z-Score means BMI is below the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age. BMI Z-scores are derived only for participants aged 24 months or older, the change from baseline to Week 52 in BMI Z-score is summarized for Cohort 1 only as no participants in Cohort 2 or Cohort 3 were 24 months at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52-0.12 Z-ScoreStandard Deviation 0.48
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52-0.18 Z-ScoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52

Body Mass Index (BMI): For height used for BMI calculation, participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 measurement is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 520.20 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.34
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52-0.45 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 0.94
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 520.55 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 520.08 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 0.75
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 520.74 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.7
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 520.94 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52

The CBCL is used as a screening tool for emotional or behavioral problems, measuring initial behavior severity, tracking changes in behavioral problems over the course of treatment, and treatment planning. The CBCL 1.5-5 years old consists of 100 questions, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=Not True (as far as you know), 1= Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2=Very True or Often True). The scores for each individual question within a domain are summed to give a domain score. The CBCL uses a normative sample to create standard scores, which are scaled so that 50 is average with a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate more emotional or behavioral issues. CBCL was waived for children \< 18 months old. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Total Problems Total-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Sleep Problems Total-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Somatic Complaints Total0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Anxious/Depressed Total0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Emotionally Reactive Total-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Aggressive Behavior Total-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Attention Problems Total-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
SentinelChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Withdrawn Total-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Emotionally Reactive Total0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Anxious/Depressed Total0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Withdrawn Total0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Somatic Complaints Total0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Sleep Problems Total0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Attention Problems Total-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Aggressive Behavior Total0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Total Problems Total2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Withdrawn Total0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Sleep Problems Total-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Emotionally Reactive Total1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Attention Problems Total-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Anxious/Depressed Total0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Aggressive Behavior Total-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Somatic Complaints Total0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Total Problems Total-2.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Somatic Complaints Total1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Aggressive Behavior Total-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Sleep Problems Total1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Anxious/Depressed Total0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Emotionally Reactive Total1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Withdrawn Total-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Total Problems Total3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52CBCL Pre-School : Attention Problems Total-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52

The Pediatric Functional Independence Measure-II (WeeFIM®-II) is designed to measure functional independence of children between the ages of 6 months & 18 yrs who have physical or general developmental limitations. The WeeFIM-II is comprised of 3 domains that are rated by clinicians based on information obtained from parents/caregivers (self-care \[score range 8 to 56\], mobility \[score range 8 to 35\], & cognition \[score range 8 to 35\]) & provides a total score between 18 (worst) & 126 (Best). Higher score reflects higher level of independence. Performance of a child on each of individual items within WeeFIM is assigned to one of seven levels on an ordinal scale that represent function from complete & modified independence (levels 7 & 6) without a helping person to modified & complete dependence (levels 5 to 1) with a helping person. Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM-II) is only validated in children ages 6 months to 18 yrs. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Cognitive Score2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
SentinelChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM-II Total Score11.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
SentinelChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Mobility Score2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
SentinelChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM : Self-Care Score6.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Mobility Score4.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM-II Total Score14.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM : Self-Care Score6.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Cognitive Score3.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM : Self-Care Score3.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Mobility Score7.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM-II Total Score16.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Cognitive Score5.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Cognitive Score4.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM : Self-Care Score5.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM: Mobility Score6.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52WeeFIM-II Total Score16.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52

As a general rule, standing height/sitting height was used if participants were aged \>= 24 months at baseline. Body length/crown to rump was used if participants were aged \< 24 months at baseline. If body length was not measured and standing height was available, standing height was used.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS (randomized) Population and FAS population.~This is model-based analysis, it is true that the participants analyzed for placebo FAS \& FAS (randomized) are the same, but participants analyzed for vosoritide arm FAS \& FAS (randomized) are different, that's why the model-based results for placebo are different.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
SentinelChange From Baseline in Height at Week 528.15 cm
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Height at Week 527.38 cm
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Height at Week 528.41 cm
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Height at Week 527.45 cm
Comparison: Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [-0.02, 1.56]
Comparison: Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [0.26, 1.66]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52

97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score-1.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.43
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score4.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score1.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.53
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score2.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores4.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.62
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score3.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score-6.01 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.83
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score9.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.06
SentinelChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score-1.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.37
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score-1.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.22
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores4.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score8.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.06
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score2.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.37
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score-0.84 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.89
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score-1.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.72
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score4.76 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.78
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score0.54 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score4.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score-5.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.41
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores-0.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score-8.05 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score3.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.62
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score0.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.64
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score0.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score-2.73 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.29
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score-1.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score-3.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score1.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score-7.08 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score-7.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores1.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score-0.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score-4.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score-6.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score-2.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.61
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score-4.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.77
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score-2.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score-5.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.75
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score-10.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.59
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score-2.84 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.62
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score-3.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.84
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score9.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.89
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores3.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.35
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score2.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.29
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Growth and Development Scores-3.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.19
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Family Cohesion Score-4.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.54
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental Impact Time Score2.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.93
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Overall Health Score0.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.01
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Pain Score2.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.58
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Temperament and mood Score4.62 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.48
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Physical Abilities Score-15.91 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.74
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Parental impact emotional score-2.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.05
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52Global health perceptions score0.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.11
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 52

97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 522.73 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.36
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 520.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 521.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 52-3.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.46
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 520.00 Score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 52

97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global health perceptions. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo and Cohort 3 vosoritide are 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 527.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.18
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 521.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 522.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 520.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.35
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52

97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global behaviour. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 521.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.42
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 520.29 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.58
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 523.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52-10.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.71
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52-15.00 Score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 52

97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, & transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global change in health. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 520.08 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 520.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 52-0.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 520.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 520.00 Score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52

For Height: subjects aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Subjects aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 measurement is not available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio0.05 RatioStandard Deviation 0.15
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.08
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.02
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.06
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.17
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.07
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio-0.09 RatioStandard Deviation 0.06
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.02
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio-0.16 RatioStandard Deviation 0.24
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio-0.09 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio-0.10 RatioStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.29
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.04
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length(Thigh)-Knee to Heel Length Ratio-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.22
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Arm Span to Standing Height Ratio-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm(Forearm)Length Ratio-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52

Change from baseline in other growth measures (upper body length, head circumference, arm span, upper arm length, lower arm (Forearm) length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length (Thigh), knee to heel length, and tibial length) at Week 52. Participants aged \<24 months, body length and crown to rump length take precedence over standing height and sitting height. Participants aged \<24 months at baseline and \>=24 months at Week 52, body length and crown to rump length take precedence.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population.~Change from baseline was based on the participants with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 measurement is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span4.86 cmStandard Deviation 1.99
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference0.68 cmStandard Deviation 0.66
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length3.04 cmStandard Deviation 1.52
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length1.02 cmStandard Deviation 1.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length0.49 cmStandard Deviation 0.96
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length2.41 cmStandard Deviation 1.31
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)0.82 cmStandard Deviation 1.75
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length1.52 cmStandard Deviation 0.76
SentinelChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length0.85 cmStandard Deviation 0.69
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length0.77 cmStandard Deviation 0.96
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length3.54 cmStandard Deviation 1.81
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length0.79 cmStandard Deviation 0.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length2.21 cmStandard Deviation 0.67
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span5.82 cmStandard Deviation 3.65
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference0.74 cmStandard Deviation 0.49
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)1.55 cmStandard Deviation 1.46
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length2.89 cmStandard Deviation 1.99
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length1.16 cmStandard Deviation 1.35
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length2.70 cmStandard Deviation 0.75
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span7.13 cmStandard Deviation 1.59
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length1.08 cmStandard Deviation 0.93
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length1.97 cmStandard Deviation 1.49
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length1.78 cmStandard Deviation 0.44
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length2.39 cmStandard Deviation 1.27
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)0.38 cmStandard Deviation 1.71
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length5.45 cmStandard Deviation 1.75
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference2.29 cmStandard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span7.22 cmStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference3.10 cmStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)1.10 cmStandard Deviation 1.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length1.44 cmStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length5.20 cmStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length3.79 cmStandard Deviation 1.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length1.57 cmStandard Deviation 0.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length2.29 cmStandard Deviation 1.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length1.99 cmStandard Deviation 0.8
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length1.66 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length3.86 cmStandard Deviation 1.55
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length1.83 cmStandard Deviation 0.88
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)1.98 cmStandard Deviation 2.21
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span8.22 cmStandard Deviation 1.93
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length2.93 cmStandard Deviation 0.68
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference5.35 cmStandard Deviation 0.71
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length1.95 cmStandard Deviation 1.23
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length6.58 cmStandard Deviation 0.99
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper body length6.75 cmStandard Deviation 0.86
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Head Circumference6.29 cmStandard Deviation 0.81
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Arm Span8.99 cmStandard Deviation 4.77
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Arm (Forearm) Length1.49 cmStandard Deviation 0.79
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Leg Length (Thigh)1.93 cmStandard Deviation 1.65
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Tibial Length1.39 cmStandard Deviation 0.77
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Upper Arm Length1.44 cmStandard Deviation 1.33
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Knee to Heel Length3.12 cmStandard Deviation 0.85
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52Lower Body Length4.41 cmStandard Deviation 1.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52

Upper to Lower Body ratio=Sitting Height / (Standing Height - Sitting Height).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS (randomized) Population and FAS population.~This is model-based analysis, it is true that the participants analyzed for placebo FAS \& FAS (randomized) are the same, but participants analyzed for vosoritide arm FAS \& FAS (randomized) are different, that's why the model-based results for placebo are different.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
SentinelChange From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52-0.20 Ratio
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52-0.13 Ratio
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52-0.19 Ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52-0.13 Ratio
Comparison: Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [-0.17, 0.04]
Comparison: Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.95% CI: [-0.15, 0.03]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52

The weight Z-score represents the participant's weight converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean weight for age and sex of the reference population. A positive weight Z-score means weight is above the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative weight Z-Score means weight is below the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 measurement is not available

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 520.14 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.44
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 520.14 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.42
Randomized PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 520.74 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 520.70 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52-0.81 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.49
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52-0.66 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.77
Secondary

Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Sacral Tilt10.6 DegreeStandard Deviation 13.2
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Lordosis Angle12.5 DegreeStandard Deviation 17.4
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Kyphosis Angle-2.2 DegreeStandard Deviation 13.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Sacral Tilt5.7 DegreeStandard Deviation 15.9
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Lordosis Angle8.4 DegreeStandard Deviation 14.2
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angles at Week 52Kyphosis Angle-2.1 DegreeStandard Deviation 10.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52

Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on subjects with available measurements at both time points. Overall no. of participants analyzed (N) is greater than no. analyzed for Placebo, as different participants missed for different variables (Ex:1 subject missed sagittal width L1,L2,L3, 1 subject missed sagittal width L5 \& 1 subject missed sagittal width L4 \& L5. Therefore, n for sagittal width L1,L2,L3,L4 \& L5 are 26,26,26,26,25 respectively but the overall number of subjects is 27)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L2)0.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.18
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L4)0.16 cmStandard Deviation 0.24
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L3)0.08 cmStandard Deviation 0.2
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L5)0.13 cmStandard Deviation 0.34
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L1)0.07 cmStandard Deviation 0.26
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L5)0.06 cmStandard Deviation 0.26
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L1)0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0.22
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L2)0.01 cmStandard Deviation 0.18
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L3)0.04 cmStandard Deviation 0.19
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Sagittal Width and Week 52Sagittal Width (L4)0.03 cmStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L2)0.12 cmStandard Deviation 0.16
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L4)0.09 cmStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L3)0.08 cmStandard Deviation 0.15
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L5)0.10 cmStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L1)0.12 cmStandard Deviation 0.17
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L5)0.05 cmStandard Deviation 0.14
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L1)0.12 cmStandard Deviation 0.11
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L2)0.09 cmStandard Deviation 0.13
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L3)0.09 cmStandard Deviation 0.12
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Transverse Diameter at Week 52Transverse Diameter (L4)0.06 cmStandard Deviation 0.11
Secondary

Change From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L5)-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.15
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L4)0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L2)-0.06 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L5)0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L1)-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L1)-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.15
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L4)0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L2)0.05 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L2)-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L3)-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L3)-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.19
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L4)-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.13
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L3)-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L5)0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
SentinelChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L1)-0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L5)-0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.21
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L1)-0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.2
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L2)-0.07 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L3)0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.09
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L4)-0.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Medial Height Ratio (L5)0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.17
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L1)-0.08 RatioStandard Deviation 0.17
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L2)-0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L3)0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L4)0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.13
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Anterior Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L5)0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.15
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L1)-0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L2)0.03 RatioStandard Deviation 0.09
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L3)-0.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Ratios at Week 52Medial Height to Posterior Height Ratio (L4)0.04 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score

Hologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score Change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants lumbar spine BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A BMD Z-score \<-2 SD can indicate low bone density in the lumbar spine in children. The Lumbar Spine BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD in the lumbar spine to the average spinal bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis of the spine.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score0.17 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.24
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-Score0.03 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Whole Body BMD Z-score

Hologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMD Z-Score. Change in whole body bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score from baseline at 52 weeks indicates whether there has been a positive or negative change in BMD using a z-score generated by converting the participants BMD to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. A whole body BMD Z-score \<-2 SD can indicate low bone density in children. The Whole Body BMD (bone mineral density) z-score compares the BMD to the average bone density of people of the same age, and sex as a comparator. A Z-score less than 0 means that the participant has a lower BMD than people in the same age and sex group, and could indicate a risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Whole Body BMD Z-score-0.20 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.35
Randomized VosoritideChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Whole Body BMD Z-score0.30 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Change in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52

Sleep-testing device was used to assess presence & severity of sleep-disordered breathing by measurement of blood oxygen(O2)saturation,pulse rate,& airflow during overnight monitoring Episodes(Epi) of sleep apnea variables summarized as: Number(No.)of epi of apnea/hr(AI);No.of epi of hypopnea/hr(HI);No.of epi of obstructive apnea hypopneas/hr(AHI);No.of epi of obstructive apneas/hr(Obstructive Apnea Index);No.of epi of central apneas/hr(CAI);No.of desaturations/hr \>=3% AHI is a marker of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), scored as No.of apnea or hypopnea epi/hr, with AHI \<=1/hr normal, 1\< AHI\<=5 mild,5\< AHI \<=10 moderate,& AHI\>10/hr severe OSA. CAI reflects cervical cord compression at cervical-medullary junction, & is No. of epi of a pause in ventilation with no associated respiratory effort, with\> 5 epi/hr abnormal.O2 desaturation index measures average No. of desaturation epi/hr, defined as decrease in O2 saturation of \>=3% for at least 10sec, with(\<8/hr normal & \>=8/hr abnormal

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: FAS population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 measurement is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)-1.26 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.66
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)-0.54 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.7
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index0.19 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.73
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%-0.41 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.51
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)0.52 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.35
SentinelChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)-1.07 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.12
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)-1.45 Events per hourStandard Deviation 4.63
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)-0.74 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.86
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)-0.61 Events per hourStandard Deviation 3.63
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%-1.24 Events per hourStandard Deviation 3.98
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)-0.83 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.93
Randomized VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index-0.09 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.45
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)0.40 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.34
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index0.68 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.52
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)1.06 Events per hourStandard Deviation 4.8
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)-0.28 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.89
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)0.66 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.53
Randomized PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%0.98 Events per hourStandard Deviation 3.6
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%-0.69 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)-0.01 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)-0.71 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.61
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)-0.72 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index-0.01 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)-0.71 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.61
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)-1.00 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.97
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)2.97 Events per hourStandard Deviation 5.45
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)1.89 Events per hourStandard Deviation 6.31
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index-0.07 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.64
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%1.71 Events per hourStandard Deviation 6.63
Cohort 3: PlaceboChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)-1.09 Events per hourStandard Deviation 1.22
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Index (AI)-0.36 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.54
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Central Apnea Index (CAI)0.50 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.92
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Desaturation per Hour >=3%-0.93 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.6
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Hypopnea Index (HI)-0.56 Events per hourStandard Deviation 0.54
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)-0.94 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.78
Cohort 3: VosoritideChange in Sleep Study Indices at Week 52Obstructive Index-0.86 Events per hourStandard Deviation 2.08
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52

Percentages were calculated using the total number of subjects in the safety population (N for each treatment group) as the denominator. All increases are comparing results at Week 52 relative to the baseline assessment.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in lordosis angle (deg) >=1019 Number of participants
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in kyphosis angle (deg) >=109 Number of participants
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in lordosis angle (deg) >=5 to <105 Number of participants
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in sacral tilt (deg) >=5 to <103 Number of participants
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in kyphosis angle (deg) >=5 to <103 Number of participants
SentinelChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in sacral tilt (deg) >=1024 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in kyphosis angle (deg) >=5 to <102 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in lordosis angle (deg) >=5 to <101 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in lordosis angle (deg) >=1014 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in sacral tilt (deg) >=1010 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in kyphosis angle (deg) >=104 Number of participants
Randomized VosoritideChanges From Baseline in X-ray of Lumbar Spine Angle Changes: Number of Participants With an Increase in Lumbar Spine Angle at Week 52Increase in sacral tilt (deg) >=5 to <106 Number of participants
Secondary

DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMC

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMCGE - Lunar Prodigy Lumbar Spine BMC2.73 gmStandard Deviation 0.83
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMCHologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMC2.19 gmStandard Deviation 0.68
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMCGE - Lunar Prodigy Lumbar Spine BMC2.09 gmStandard Deviation 0.97
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMCHologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMC1.94 gmStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMD

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMDGE - Lunar Prodigy Lumbar Spine BMD0.07 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.04
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMDHologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMD0.05 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.03
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMDGE - Lunar Prodigy Lumbar Spine BMD0.05 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.03
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Lumbar Spine BMDHologic - Discovery Horizon Lumbar Spine BMD0.06 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.04
Secondary

DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMC

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMCGE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body BMC96.85 gmStandard Deviation 39.82
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMCHologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMC87.97 gmStandard Deviation 32.35
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMCGE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body BMC98.99 gmStandard Deviation 32.45
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMCHologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMC101.33 gmStandard Deviation 33.34
Secondary

DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMD

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMDGE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body BMD0.06 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.06
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMDHologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMD0.05 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMDHologic - Discovery Horizon Whole Body BMD0.07 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.03
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body BMDGE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body BMD0.07 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.04
Secondary

DEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)GE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body Less Head BMD0.04 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
SentinelDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Hologic Discovery Horizon Whole Body Less Head BMD0.03 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.01
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)GE - Lunar Prodigy Whole Body Less Head BMD0.05 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.03
Randomized VosoritideDEXA Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 of Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Hologic Discovery Horizon Whole Body Less Head BMD0.04 g/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline was based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelDual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)GE - Lunar Prodigy: Whole Body Less Head BMC55.87 gmStandard Deviation 14.68
SentinelDual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)Hologic Discovery Horizon Whole Body Less Head BMC44.61 gmStandard Deviation 12.62
Randomized VosoritideDual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)GE - Lunar Prodigy: Whole Body Less Head BMC50.26 gmStandard Deviation 17.44
Randomized VosoritideDual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Whole Body Less Head Bone Mineral Content (BMC)Hologic Discovery Horizon Whole Body Less Head BMC47.19 gmStandard Deviation 12.55
Secondary

Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled Visits

Number of participants with Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled Visits for : total antibody (TAb), Neutralizing antibodies (NAb), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) & C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). TAb Titer Positive, NAb Titer Positive, ANP Reactivity Positive, BNP Reactivity Positive & CNP Reactivity Positive. Day 1 is the baseline assessment result taken prior to first dose of study drug. Ever Positive = the number of participants with at least one positive sample result.

Time frame: At Day 1, Week 3, Week 13, Week 26, Week 52, & Ever Positive.

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 130 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Ever Positive8 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Day 10 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 262 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 528 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Day 10 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 30 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 130 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 260 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 520 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Ever Positive0 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 131 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 266 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Ever Positive12 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Day 10 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 522 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Ever Positive3 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Day 10 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 131 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Ever Positive4 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 30 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Day 13 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 5211 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 132 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 263 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 262 participants
SentinelImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 524 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Ever Positive0 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 260 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Ever Positive0 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Day 13 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Day 10 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 30 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 130 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 260 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 130 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsTAb Titer Positive: Week 520 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 260 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Day 10 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Ever Positive0 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 30 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 520 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Day 15 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 130 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 130 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 260 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Ever Positive0 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Positive: Week 520 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 520 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsNAb Titer Ever Positive0 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Day 11 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 130 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsBNP Reactivity Positive: Week 30 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsANP Reactivity Positive: Week 260 participants
Randomized VosoritideImmunogenicity: Number of Participants With Incidence of Antibody Positivity at Scheduled VisitsCNP Reactivity Positive: Week 520 participants
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum Level

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Foramen Magnum0.021 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.342
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum Level0.011 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.197
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Foramen Magnum0.060 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.203
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum Level0.072 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.163
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to Sinus

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population.~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to calvarium0.002 RatioStandard Deviation 0.031
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of area of spinal cord to foramen magnum0.005 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to sinus-6.798 RatioStandard Deviation 175.646
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to calvarium0.003 RatioStandard Deviation 0.033
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of area of spinal cord to foramen magnum0.037 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to sinus14.505 RatioStandard Deviation 284.95
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety population~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Sinus2.362 cm^3Standard Deviation 3.578
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Whole Brain Total Volume175.399 cm^3Standard Deviation 158.088
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Calvarium213.075 cm^3Standard Deviation 202.415
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Ventricles Total Volume11.394 cm^3Standard Deviation 20.416
SentinelMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Face80.527 cm^3Standard Deviation 59.211
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Ventricles Total Volume8.515 cm^3Standard Deviation 16.325
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Face78.107 cm^3Standard Deviation 33.369
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Sinus1.195 cm^3Standard Deviation 3.769
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Calvarium183.427 cm^3Standard Deviation 183.21
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Whole Brain Total Volume146.247 cm^3Standard Deviation 115.274
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum Level

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety Population.~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Foramen Magnum9.19 Percent changeStandard Deviation 47.36
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of spinal cord at the foramen magnum level7.51 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.14
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of Foramen Magnum7.50 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.88
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Area of Foramen Magnum & Area of Spinal Cord at the Foramen Magnum LevelArea of spinal cord at the foramen magnum level19.60 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.26
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to Sinus

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety Population.~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to sinus-5.37 Percent changeStandard Deviation 60.83
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of Face Volume to Calvarium0.78 Percent changeStandard Deviation 9.06
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum2.86 Percent changeStandard Deviation 23.4
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum9.50 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.68
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of face volume to sinus92.24 Percent changeStandard Deviation 341.33
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Ratio of Face Volume to Calvarium, Ratio of Area of Spinal Cord to Foramen Magnum, Ratio of Face Volume to SinusRatio of Face Volume to Calvarium1.31 Percent changeStandard Deviation 10.07
Secondary

MRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: Safety Population~Change from baseline and percent change from baseline are based on the subjects with available measurements at both time points. Baseline is defined as Day 1 or screening if a Day 1 assessment is not available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Face20.79 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.46
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of sinus72.33 percent changeStandard Deviation 100.93
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Calvarium19.41 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.73
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Whole Brain Total Volume20.58 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.29
SentinelMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Ventricles Total Volume33.44 percent changeStandard Deviation 52.69
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Ventricles Total Volume30.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 50.65
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Whole Brain Total Volume16.89 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.22
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of sinus81.97 percent changeStandard Deviation 169.74
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Face19.18 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.22
Randomized VosoritideMRI Parameter: Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 52 for Volume of Face, Sinus, Calvarium, Whole Brain Total Volume, Ventricles Total Volume.Volume of Calvarium16.50 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.82
Secondary

PK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 01134 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 59.8
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13111 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 58.5
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2679.8 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 48.3
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13201 ml/min/kg
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0165.9 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 31.6
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1358.7 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 40.4
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2679.4 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 37.7
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3978.3 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 10.9
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5249.7 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 32
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0195.9 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 34
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13115 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 78.1
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26104 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 23.2
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3973.6 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 41.6
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3965.3 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 32.7
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 5269 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 41.2
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 1147 ml/min/kg
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2679.5 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 38.4
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3975.5 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 14.8
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52122 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 52.5
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5276.5 ml/min/kgStandard Deviation 49.8
Secondary

PK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. V/F excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 392250 ml/kgStandard Deviation 284
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 014070 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2310
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 133990 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2960
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 263400 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2520
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 392330 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1150
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 522660 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1420
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 015550 ml/kg
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 137810 ml/kg
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 263890 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2880
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 132090 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1360
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 261960 ml/kgStandard Deviation 829
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 392920 ml/kgStandard Deviation 205
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 523040 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2630
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 015240 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1890
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 262750 ml/kgStandard Deviation 710
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 392200 ml/kgStandard Deviation 951
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 522620 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1950
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 523770 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1410
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 013190 ml/kgStandard Deviation 1790
SentinelPK Parameter: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 134260 ml/kgStandard Deviation 2960
Secondary

PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞ excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.

Time frame: At Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.

Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK) Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the safety population who have at least one evaluable PK concentration.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13197000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 144000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26306000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 252000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 1374500 min*pg/ml
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26233000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 132000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39204000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 39700
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26429000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 163000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39387000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 53800
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52768000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 391000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01353000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 133000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13382000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 268000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26305000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 82100
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39575000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 455000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52622000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 455000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 01149000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 98000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39284000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 137000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52303000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 208000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 01102000 min*pg/ml
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52137000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 48900
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01557000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 278000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) at Day1, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13670000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 312000
Secondary

PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 01134000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 96500
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13183000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 126000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26283000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 222000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39257000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 132000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52260000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 172000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0183100 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 48300
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13115000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 59300
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26197000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 121000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39166000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 81000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52125000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 76700
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01525000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 251000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13642000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 353000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26408000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 148000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39365000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 44700
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26300000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 79100
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39591000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 359000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52558000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 400000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52670000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 335000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01312000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 119000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Nominal 120 Minutes Postdose (AUC 0- 120 Min) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13342000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 245000
Secondary

PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 01132000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 97300
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13182000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 127000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26282000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 222000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39256000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 132000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52258000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 169000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0165900 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 33600
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 13112000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 62900
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 26196000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 121000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 39165000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 82400
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 52122000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 75700
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01547000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 279000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13645000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 357000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26407000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 148000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39567000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 361000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52557000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 401000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 39365000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 44300
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 52672000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 334000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 01323000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 129000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 13340000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 244000
SentinelPK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 26297000 min*pg/mlStandard Deviation 80700
Secondary

PK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Vosoritide concentrations at 5-, 15- and 30-minute post-dose for one participant on Day 1 were not available, hence PK parameters for this participant were excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters for another participant on Day 1 obtained from extrapolation. AUC0-∞, CL/F, V/F and t1/2 excluded from summary statistics. PK parameters are not available for this participant at Week 13 due to unsuccessful venipuncture, and Week 26 as post-dose PK samples were not collected.

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0121.7 minStandard Deviation 7.99
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 1325.4 minStandard Deviation 10.7
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2629.2 minStandard Deviation 7.06
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3925.7 minStandard Deviation 7.82
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 5229 minStandard Deviation 9.12
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0126.1 min
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 1326.9 min
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2632.7 minStandard Deviation 9.62
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3920.9 minStandard Deviation 2.18
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 5224 minStandard Deviation 12.8
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0133.3 minStandard Deviation 8.41
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1325.6 minStandard Deviation 3.59
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2621 minStandard Deviation 13.1
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3926.2 minStandard Deviation 5.46
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0141.1 minStandard Deviation 18.8
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1326.2 minStandard Deviation 7.1
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2619.2 minStandard Deviation 6.14
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3922.7 minStandard Deviation 5.36
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5224.3 minStandard Deviation 6.58
SentinelPK Parameter: Elimination Half-life (t1/2) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5240.1 minStandard Deviation 15.2
Secondary

PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 012840 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1230
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 135970 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2390
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 266800 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3360
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 394600 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2150
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 523870 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2120
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0114500 pg/mlStandard Deviation 5950
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1313400 pg/mlStandard Deviation 6070
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2610100 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2970
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 396980 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1140
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5212900 pg/mlStandard Deviation 6260
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0113400 pg/mlStandard Deviation 5710
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1310500 pg/mlStandard Deviation 6850
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2611500 pg/mlStandard Deviation 4290
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 014430 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3670
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 134350 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1670
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 265850 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3260
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 395600 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2200
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 525640 pg/mlStandard Deviation 2740
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3918400 pg/mlStandard Deviation 11900
SentinelPK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5213500 pg/mlStandard Deviation 6770
Secondary

PK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52

Time frame: At Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52.

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 1314.3 minStandard Deviation 5.5
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2616.1 minStandard Deviation 8.69
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3917.4 minStandard Deviation 11.9
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Week 5216.1 minStandard Deviation 6.27
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0111.3 minStandard Deviation 6.35
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 136 minStandard Deviation 1.41
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 2610.8 minStandard Deviation 5.5
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 3915.4 minStandard Deviation 11.6
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 15 μg/kg/day: Week 5214.2 minStandard Deviation 5.76
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Day 0112.9 minStandard Deviation 9.1
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 1314 minStandard Deviation 8.42
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 2612 minStandard Deviation 5.2
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3915 minStandard Deviation 0
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 2 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5214.3 minStandard Deviation 1.53
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Day 017.36 minStandard Deviation 3.53
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 139.43 minStandard Deviation 5.22
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 269 minStandard Deviation 4.69
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 3911.3 minStandard Deviation 3.59
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 3 30 μg/kg/day: Week 5214.5 minStandard Deviation 3.51
SentinelPK Parameter: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) at Day 01, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, & Week 52Cohort 1 15 μg/kg/day: Day 0113.1 minStandard Deviation 6.33

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026