Skip to content

Microbial Basis of Systemic Malodor and People Allergic To Me Conditions

Dynamics of the Gut Microbiota in Idiopathic Malodor Production

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03582826
Acronym
PATM
Enrollment
125
Registered
2018-07-11
Start date
2018-06-16
Completion date
2020-02-10
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Keywords

systemic malodor, body odor, bad breath, PATM, microbiome, TMAU, Malabsorption, Dysbiosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to identify microbial signatures associated with remission and recurrence of idiopathic malodor and PATM conditions.

Detailed description

Human odorprints, mostly owing to the microbiome, have proven their value as biomarkers of health and environmental exposures. In recent years, microbial networks responsible for localized malodors such as halitosis or axillary odor have been mapped by using next generation sequencing approaches. Intestinal microbes responsible for psychologically debilitating systemic malodor (whole-body and extraoral halitosis), however, remain to be identified. Even a relatively straightforward disorder of choline metabolism trimethylaminuria (TMAU) is thought to exhibit complex host-gene microbiome interactions and has not been sufficiently studied. Proposed controlled pilot study aims to explore the dynamics of microbial communities in remission and flare-up periods. Better knowledge of the important aspects of disease fluctuation should enhance patient care and, combined with our prior data, will help to develop new therapies and treatments.

Interventions

Behavioral nutritional counselling delivered via the Internet.

BEHAVIORALStress-reduction counseling

The psycho-behavioral intervention includes administering questionnaires and monthly maintenance psychological support delivered via the Internet.

Sponsors

uBiome
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Aurametrix
CollaboratorOTHER
Mebo Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* idiopathic malodor or PATM symptoms experienced over a period of several months or years * able to read and understand the study information * willing and able to comply with questionnaires, nutritional recommendations, and other study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* consistent inability to communicate and process things related to their symptoms * consistent inability to distinguish physical symptoms from pure emotional reactions * lack of motivation to start feeling better

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gut Microbiome1 yearAbundance \[operational taxonomic units\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life [Score]1 yearQoL: Scores range from 20 (lowest level of satisfaction with life) to 150 (maximal life satisfaction). Quality of life (QOL) will be measured with MEBO quality of life assessment questionnaire, a new tool designed on the basis of the Halitosis Associated Life-quality Test (HALT), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and WHOQOL-100 questionnaires. Most questions were devised with a Likert scale of 0-5 where a higher score indicated a higher quality of life. Scores for five negatively framed questions are transformed to positively framed questions. Total QOL score (minimum score of 20 and maximum score of 150) is computed based on four aspects of QOL: physical health, psychological health, social support and environment.
Idiopathic Malodor Episodes1 year after study enrollmentThe number of flareups after study enrollment
Change in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and Improvements1 yearThe fecal microbial composition will be measured via taxonomic profiling using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing of submitted gut samples
Alpha Diversity1 yearAlpha (within-sample) diversity measure using microbial abundance information in a phylogenetic framework. Represented by abundance-weighted phylogenetic entropy.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MEBO/PATM Cohort
The cohort is 119 individuals who experienced symptoms of idiopathic malodor (MEBO: 70 participants) and/or PATM (people allergic to me condition: 39 participants)
119
Non-MEBO/PATM Cohort
6 data volunteers that never experienced episodes of uncontrollable socially debilitating odor or PATM.
6
Total125

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up390
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMEBO/PATM CohortNon-MEBO/PATM CohortTotal
Age, Continuous40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
PATM status
MEBO
59 Participants0 Participants59 Participants
PATM status
neither MEBO nor PATM
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
PATM status
PATM with or without MEBO
60 Participants0 Participants60 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Burkina Faso
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants0 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Morocco
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Nigeria
3 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Pakistan
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 participants1 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
10 participants0 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
70 participants5 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants1 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants5 Participants45 Participants
TMAU status
Negative TMAU test result
26 Participants0 Participants26 Participants
TMAU status
Not tested for TMAU
58 Participants6 Participants64 Participants
TMAU status
Primary TMAU
23 Participants0 Participants23 Participants
TMAU status
Secondary TMAU
12 Participants0 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 125
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Gut Microbiome

Abundance \[operational taxonomic units\]

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Study volunteers that submitted gut microbiome samples (84 out of 125 enrolled)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesGut MicrobiomePhylum Bacteroidetes25 Normalized OTU counts
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesGut MicrobiomePhylum Actinobacteria3.73 Normalized OTU counts
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesGut MicrobiomePhylum Tenericutes0.04 Normalized OTU counts
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesGut MicrobiomePhylum Proteobacteria4.64 Normalized OTU counts
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesGut MicrobiomePhylum Firmicutes52 Normalized OTU counts
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortGut MicrobiomePhylum Proteobacteria3.70 Normalized OTU counts
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortGut MicrobiomePhylum Firmicutes64 Normalized OTU counts
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortGut MicrobiomePhylum Bacteroidetes33 Normalized OTU counts
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortGut MicrobiomePhylum Tenericutes0.35 Normalized OTU counts
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortGut MicrobiomePhylum Actinobacteria3.37 Normalized OTU counts
Secondary

Alpha Diversity

Alpha (within-sample) diversity measure using microbial abundance information in a phylogenetic framework. Represented by abundance-weighted phylogenetic entropy.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Participants that submitted valid stool samples. Since 16 individuals who observed improvement of their symptoms changed the status of their MEBO/PATM condition from active to remission/regression, their samples were grouped in two subgroups (38+33+23+6 = 84+16) Units analyzed represents samples submitted, 233 total.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesAlpha Diversity1.7 unitless
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortAlpha Diversity1.6 unitless
Subjects in Regression or RemissionAlpha Diversity1.7 unitless
Non MEBO/PATM CohortAlpha Diversity1.9 unitless
Secondary

Change in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and Improvements

The fecal microbial composition will be measured via taxonomic profiling using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing of submitted gut samples

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Study participants that submitted two or more microbiome samples (each accompanied by answers to QoL questionnaire) and observed improvement of their symptoms (22 participants that documented their improvement out of 119 participants in MEBO/PATM cohort).~Participants from Non-MEBO Cohort are not included since they did not participate in the intervention; there was no difference between their entries in terms of flareups or improvements of MEBO/PATM conditions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesChange in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and ImprovementsSelected dermatological bacteria, normalized counts162 Normalized OTU counts in gut sample
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesChange in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and ImprovementsCorynebacteriales order, normalized counts302 Normalized OTU counts in gut sample
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortChange in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and ImprovementsSelected dermatological bacteria, normalized counts15 Normalized OTU counts in gut sample
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortChange in Fecal Microbiome Composition Between Flare-ups and ImprovementsCorynebacteriales order, normalized counts91 Normalized OTU counts in gut sample
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [26, 163]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Idiopathic Malodor Episodes

The number of flareups after study enrollment

Time frame: 1 year after study enrollment

Population: Individuals from MEBO/PATM cohort who submitted at least one gut microbiome sample accompanied by a QoL survey. Non-MEBO Cohort is not included since they never experienced MEBO/PATM flareups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesIdiopathic Malodor Episodessevere flareups81 observations
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesIdiopathic Malodor Episodesmoderate flareups27 observations
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesIdiopathic Malodor Episodesremission episodes6 observations
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesIdiopathic Malodor Episodesnot sure40 observations
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortIdiopathic Malodor Episodesnot sure3 observations
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortIdiopathic Malodor Episodessevere flareups7 observations
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortIdiopathic Malodor Episodesremission episodes12 observations
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortIdiopathic Malodor Episodesmoderate flareups12 observations
Secondary

Quality of Life [Score]

QoL: Scores range from 20 (lowest level of satisfaction with life) to 150 (maximal life satisfaction). Quality of life (QOL) will be measured with MEBO quality of life assessment questionnaire, a new tool designed on the basis of the Halitosis Associated Life-quality Test (HALT), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and WHOQOL-100 questionnaires. Most questions were devised with a Likert scale of 0-5 where a higher score indicated a higher quality of life. Scores for five negatively framed questions are transformed to positively framed questions. Total QOL score (minimum score of 20 and maximum score of 150) is computed based on four aspects of QOL: physical health, psychological health, social support and environment.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Study participants from MEBO/PATM cohort that answered QoL survey (71 out of 119 in MEBO/PATM cohort). Since QOL questionnaire was administered multiple times for each participant, type of units analyzed is number of QoL submissions. Non MEBO/PATM cohort did not participate in this intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MEBO/PATM Cohort That Submitted Gut SamplesQuality of Life [Score]57 score on a scale
Non-MEBO/PATM CohortQuality of Life [Score]97 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026