Skip to content

Organization of the Dietetic Service in a Hospital

Organization of the Dietetic Service in a Hospital - on the Ward or Centralized?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03582202
Enrollment
33
Registered
2018-07-10
Start date
2015-04-18
Completion date
2017-04-22
Last updated
2018-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malnutrition, Nutritional Disease

Keywords

dietitic service, organization of service

Brief summary

In Denmark the dieticians can be organized centrally and called upon if needed, or locally in larger units, or very locally related to bed-units. The organization form is based on tradition not on measurements of quality. We wanted to compare the very local form with the traditional centralized. Methods: Randomized, unblinded, parallel design. The intervention group (IT) was nutritionally handled by the dietician, and the control group (C) by the nurses as previously with the possibility for dietetic help from the center.

Detailed description

All patients were screened by NRS-2002 and had their estimated needs calculated (equations in IT, tables in C). The IT was in addition assessed for adapted weight-loss, counseled with a plan for nutrition and followed-up daily by the dietician if at nutritional risk. All patients were re-screened weekly and had their intake registered. Hand-grib-strength (HGS) was measured in both groups at admittance and discharge, and weight three times weekly. The primary endpoint was re-admission rate to hospital within 2 months.

Interventions

PROCEDURENutritional assessment and therapy

Nutritional screening, nutritional plan, follow-up and instructions on discharge

PROCEDUREStandard care

Nutritional handling by nurse

Sponsors

Jens Rikardt Andersen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Results handled without knowledge of randomization group

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult * acutely admitted to hospital

Exclusion criteria

* dementia * unable to comply with the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
re-admission-rate after discharge (%)2 monthsadmission for the same diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intake of protein during hospital stay1 week% of estimated needs
intake of energy during hospital stay1 week% of estimated needs

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026