Skip to content

Pivotal Study in Nosocomial Pneumonia Suspected or Confirmed to be Due to Pseudomonas

A Multicenter, Open Label, Sponsor Blinded, Randomized, Active Controlled, Parallel Group, Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Murepavadin Given With Ertapenem Versus an Anti-pseudomonal-β-lactam-based Antibiotic in Adult Subjects With Nosocomial Pneumonia Suspected or Confirmed to be Due to Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03582007
Acronym
PRISM-UDR
Enrollment
2
Registered
2018-07-10
Start date
2018-10-22
Completion date
2019-07-17
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia

Brief summary

This is a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, sponsor blinded, randomized active-controlled, parallel group to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravenous murepavadin given with ertapenem versus an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam based antibiotic in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in adult subjects

Interventions

Murepavadin + ertapenem

DRUGOne anti-pseudomonal antibiotic

Either meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam

Sponsors

Polyphor Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sponsor blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Subject has received mechanical ventilation for at least 48h at the time of the randomisation OR at least 2 of the following signs or symptoms presenting within 24 hours prior to randomization: New onset of cough or worsening of baseline cough and/or dyspnea, tachypnea and/or hypoxemia and/or new onset of sputum or suctioned respiratory secretion characterized by purulent appearance indicative of bacterial infection or a worsening in character of purulent appearance * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) of 8 to 25, inclusive, within 24h prior to randomization * Presence of new or progressive infiltrate on chest X-ray * Presence of clinical criteria consistent with Pneumonia * Strong clinical suspicion of pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa Key

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or viral, fungal, or parasitic pneumonia * known hypersensitivity to any component of ertapenem, meropenem or to other drugs in the same class or demonstrated anaphylactic reactions to beta-lactams or a history of allergic reactions to any of the penicillins, cephalosporins, or β-lactamase inhibitors * Severe liver or renal impairment * Expected survival \< 72 hours * Evidence from an available surveillance culture of co infection with ertapenem , meropenem or piperacillin tazobactam resistant Gram negative pathogen(s) * Women who are pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
All cause mortality rates28 days after start of study treatment

Countries

Czechia, France, Israel, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026