Skip to content

Reliability of Hammersmith Examination in Prediction of Neurological Outcomes (REHAPENO)

Reliability of Hammersmith Examination in Prediction of Neurological Outcomes In Preterm Infants - Observational Study (REHAPENO)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03580252
Acronym
REHAPENO
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-07-09
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-01-25
Last updated
2019-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Child Development Disorders, Preterm Infant

Keywords

preterm, Child Development Disorders, Hammersmith, neurological outcomes, epidemiology

Brief summary

In this study workers are trying to test the correlation between Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination and MRI brain/cranial ultrasound with early prediction of neurological developmental outcome of preterm neonates. This study is prospective cross-sectional collecting the data of patients according to daily standard medical practice

Detailed description

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the neurobehavioural performance of infants born preterm using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) in standard medical practice and compare it with the gold standard MRI and ultrasound imagings. It would be possible to check do we need to use all the 3 examinations or Hammersmith examination would be enough reliable predictor. Secondary aim is to explore the relationships between MRI brain /cranial us abnormalities and HINE at term-equivalent age in infants born preterm in prediction of neurological outcome at 1 year of chronological age. This study will be only single arm/single group. This group would receive the regular practice of MRI, Ultrasound (US) and Hammersmith assessments. The 3 assessments would be compared in relationships with the neonatal developmental outcomes (developmental milestones).

Interventions

OTHERCorrelation analyses for the outcomes

No medical intervention would be done. The single arm would receive regular practice of Hammersmith Assessment and MRI / Ultrasound

Sponsors

Abha International Private Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Preterm infants \<37 weeks' GA at birth admitted to the neonatal nurseries at the Abha Private Hospital in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This project aims to recruit 50 infants \<37weeks at birth over a 1-year stating from march 2018

Exclusion criteria

* -infants with congenital or chromosomal abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non inferiority of MRI to Hammersmith assessments in developmental outcomes12 monthHammersmith assessment will be tested for non-inferiority to gold standard assessment method by MRI in terms of sensitivity for early prediction of delayed neurological syndrome (DNS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hammersmith health economic analyses if primary endpoint is achieved12 monthBoth cost minimization analyses and cost effective analyses would be applied
Superiority testing for Hammersmith assessment to gold standard MRI12 monthTesting the superiority of Hammersmith assessment versus gold standard MRI in terms sensitivity for early prediction of DNS
Comparing the correlations of MRI and US scans with early prediction of DNS12 monthComparing the correlations of MRI and US scans with the early prediction of DNS
Comparing the correlations of US scan and Hammersmith assessment12 monthComparing the correlations of US scan and Hammersmith assessment with the early prediction of DNS
Specificity and sensitivity for all techniques MRI, US and Hammersmith12 monthCalculations for specificity and sensitivity would be applied for MRI, US and Hammersmith

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026