Serious Bacterial Infection
Conditions
Keywords
Serious bacterial infection, cIAI, HAP/(VAP, cUTI, BSI, MBL
Brief summary
Phase 3 study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel group, comparative study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria. The study will randomize approximately 60 subjects in a 2:1 randomization scheme (ATM-AVI: BAT) with infections due to MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Molecular testing at the central microbiology laboratory will be performed to confirm the MBL status of the organism upon study completion or at pre-designated intervals. The study will consist of a Screening Visit (Visit 1), a Baseline visit (Visit 2) on Day 1 of the study treatment, ongoing treatment visits (Visits 3 to 15) from Day 2 to Day 14, an End of Treatment (EOT) visit (Visit 16) within 24 hours after the last infusion, a Test of Cure (TOC) visit (Visit 17) on Day 28 (±3 days) and a Late Follow Up (LFU) visit (Visit 18) on Day 45 (±3 days). Subjects will be stratified at randomization based on infection type (cIAI, HAP/VAP, cUTI or BSI). The number of subjects with cUTI will be no more than approximately 75% of the study population. After obtaining written informed consent and confirming eligibility, subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the ATM AVI treatment arm or the BAT treatment arm according to a central randomization schedule (approximately 40 (ATM AVI) and approximately 20 (BAT) subjects per group). The duration of treatment is 5 to 14 days for cIAI, cUTI and BSI and 7 to 14 days for HAP/VAP. Each subject is expected to complete the study, including the LFU visit. The precise duration of treatment will be determined by the investigator based on the subject's severity of infection and subsequent response to treatment. For subjects randomized to ATM AVI treatment arm, sparse blood samples will be collected for population pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships will be evaluated in subjects where plasma samples and microbiological response data have been collected.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTATM-AVI
ATM-AVI doses (loading, extended loading and maintenance) and the dosing frequency of the maintenance dose are dependent on renal function. Subjects will be given a loading dose of 500 mg ATM plus 167 mg AVI or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI over a period of 30 minutes. This treatment will immediately be followed by an extended loading dose of 1500 mg ATM plus 500 mg AVI or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI over a period of 3 hours. Then there will be a 3 hour or 5 hour gap. Subjects will receive a maintenance dose of 1500 mg ATM plus 500 mg AVI every 6 hours or 750 mg ATM plus 250 mg AVI every 6 hours, or 675 mg ATM plus 225 mg AVI every 8 hours. Subjects with cIAI will also receive Metronidazole (MTZ) 500 mg IV q8h over 60 minutes. The first dose of MTZ will be started immediately after the extended loading dose of ATM-AVI has completed and treatment will be continued until the end of the treatment period.
DRUGBAT
The comparator treatment in this study is best available therapy (BAT) based upon site practice and local epidemiology. The choice of BAT (monotherapy or combination) for each subject must be recorded prior to randomization. If the chosen BAT does not provide adequate anaerobic coverage for cIAI subjects MTZ is to be administered as a co therapy. BAT dose, frequency, dose adjustments with renal impairment will be based on per local package inserts.
Sponsors
Allergan
Pfizer
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
All Subjects 1. Subject must be ≥18 years of age. 2. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject or a legally acceptable representative has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. 3. Subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of serious bacterial infection, specifically cIAI, HAP/VAP, cUTI, or BSI requiring administration of IV antibacterial therapy. 4. Subjects must have an MBL- positive Gram- negative bacteria (an Enterobacteriaceae and/or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia for which the imipenem or meropenem MIC is ≥ 4 µg/mL), that was isolated from an appropriate specimen obtained within 7 days prior to screening. 5. Female subject of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test, with sensitivity of at least 25 mIU/mL. 6. Subjects who have received more than 48 hours of an appropriate prior systemic antibiotic\[s\] for a carbapenem non -susceptible pathogen may be enrolled if they demonstrate worsening or lack of improvement of objective symptoms or signs of infection (Note: antibiotic\[s\] is considered appropriate if microbiological susceptibility test results show that all carbapenem non -susceptible pathogens are susceptible to the systemic antibiotic\[s\] received). Additional Inclusion Criteria- cIAI Subjects 1. Subject must have a specimen obtained from an abdominal source during a surgical intervention within 7 days prior to screening from which a study qualifying pathogen was isolated upon culture. Surgical intervention includes open laparotomy, percutaneous drainage of an abscess, or laparoscopic surgery. 2. The subject has at least 1 of the following diagnosed during the surgical intervention: • Cholecystitis with gangrenous rupture or perforation or progression of the infection beyond the gallbladder wall; • Diverticular disease with perforation or abscess; * Appendiceal perforation or peri-appendiceal abscess; * Acute gastric or duodenal perforations, only if operated on \>24 hours after diagnosis; * Traumatic perforation of the intestines, only if operated on \>12 hours after diagnosis; * Other secondary peritonitis (not primary/ spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cirrhosis or chronic ascites); * Intra abdominal abscess (including of the liver and spleen provided that there is extension beyond the organ with evidence of intra peritoneal involvement). 3. Subject has at least 1 of the following signs / symptoms from each of the following 2 groups: • Group A: Evidence of systemic inflammatory response: • Documented fever (defined as body temperature ≥38°C) or hypothermia (with a rectal core body temperature ≤35°C); • Elevated white blood cells (WBC) (\>12000 cells/µL); • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) \<70 mmHg, or a SBP decrease of \>40 mmHg; • Increased heart rate ( \>90 beats per minute \[bpm\]) and respiratory rate (\>20 breaths/min); • Hypoxemia (defined as oxygen \[O2\] saturation \<95% by pulse oximetry); • Altered mental status. • Group B: Physical findings consistent with intra abdominal infection, such as: • Abdominal pain and/or tenderness, with or without rebound; • Localized or diffuse abdominal wall rigidity; • Abdominal mass. Additional Inclusion Criteria - HAP/VAP Subjects 1. Onset of symptoms \>48 hours after admission or \<7 days after discharge from an inpatient care facility (for which the duration of admission was \>3 days). 2. New or worsening infiltrate on chest X- ray (or computerized tomography \[CT\]- scan) obtained within 48 hours prior to randomization. 3. At least 1 of the following: * Documented fever (temperature ≥38°C) or hypothermia (rectal/core temperature ≤35°C); * WBC ≥10,000 cells/mm3, leukopenia with total WBC ≤4500 cells/mm3, or \>15% immature neutrophils (bands) noted on peripheral blood smear. 4. At least 2 of the following: • A new cough (or worsening of cough at Baseline); • Production of purulent sputum or purulent endotracheal secretions; • Auscultatory finding consistent with pneumonia/pulmonary consolidation (eg, rales, rhonchi, bronchial breath sounds, dullness on percussion, egophony); • Dyspnea, tachypnea, or hypoxemia (O2 saturation \<90% or partial pressure of O2 \[pO2\]\<60 mmHg while breathing room air); • Need for acute changes in the ventilator support status/system to enhance oxygenation, as determined by worsening oxygenation (arterial blood gas \[ABG\] or pO2 in arterial blood \[PaO2\]/fraction of inspired O2 \[FiO2\]) or needed changes in the amount of positive end expiratory pressure. 5. Subjects must have a respiratory specimen obtained within 7 days prior to screening for Gram stain and culture from which a study qualifying pathogen was isolated upon culture. This includes culture of either an expectorated sputum or a specimen of respiratory secretions obtained by endotracheal aspiration in intubated subjects, or by bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), mini BAL or protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Additional Inclusion Criteria - cUTI Subjects 1. Subject had urine within 7 days prior to screening that cultured positive; containing ≥10\^5 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL of at least 1 carbapenem non susceptible, MBL positive Gram-negative bacteria, ie, the isolate from the study qualifying culture. 2. Subject had pyuria in the 7 days prior to screening as determined by a midstream clean catch or catheterized urine specimen with ≥10 white blood cells (WBCs) per HighPower Field (HPF) on standard examination of urine sediment or ≥10 WBCs/mm3 in unspun urine. 3. Subject demonstrates either acute pyelonephritis or complicated lower UTI without pyelonephritis as defined by the following criteria: a. Acute pyelonephritis indicated by flank pain (which must have onset or worsened within 7 days of enrollment) or costovertebral angle tenderness on examination and at least 1 of the following: i) Fever, defined as body temperature ≥38°C (with or without patient symptoms of rigor, chills, or warmth); ii) Nausea and/or vomiting. OR b. Complicated lower UTI, as indicated by qualifying symptoms plus at least 1 complicating factor as follows: i) Qualifying symptoms: subject must have at least 2 of the following symptoms with at least 1 symptom from Group A: • Group A symptoms include dysuria, urgency, frequency, and or suprapubic pain; • Group B symptoms include fever (defined as body temperature ≥38°C with or without patient symptoms of rigor, chills, warmth), nausea, and/or vomiting. ii) Complicating factors: subject must have at least 1 of the following complicating factors: • Documented history of urinary retention (male subjects); • Obstructive uropathy that is scheduled to be medically or surgically relieved during study therapy and before the EOT; • Functional or anatomical abnormality of the urogenital tract, including anatomic malformations or neurogenic bladder, or with a postvoid residual urine volume of at least 100 mL; • Use of intermittent bladder catheterization or presence of an indwelling bladder catheter for at least 48 hours; • Urogenital procedure (such as cystoscopy or urogenital surgery) within the 7 days prior to obtainment of the specimen used for the study qualifying culture. Additional Inclusion Criteria - BSI Subjects <!-- --> 1. Subject has a confirmed diagnosis of primary BSI or catheter related BSI (CR- BSI). 2. Signs and symptoms of systemic infection characterized by at least one of the following: 1. Chills, rigors, or fever (temperature of ≥38.0°C or ≥100.4°F); 2. Elevated white blood cell count (≥10,000/mm3) or left shift (\>15% immature polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs)).
Exclusion criteria
All Subjects 1. History of serious allergic reaction (anaphylaxis, angioedema, bronchospasm, hypersensitivity) to any systemic antibacterial allowed per protocol. 2. Subject has a concurrent infection that may interfere with the evaluation of response to the study antibiotics. 3. Subject has a need for effective concomitant systemic antibacterials in addition to those allowed per protocol for the diagnoses under study. 4. Estimated CrCL ≤15 mL/min or anticipated requirement for dialysis during the study. Additional
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set | Day 28 | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Day 28 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Day 28 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Day 28 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). |
| Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | Day 28 | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set | From randomization up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set | From randomization up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until late follow-up visit (Up to Day 45) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; considered an important medical event. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study medication start date and time. |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28) | Vital signs included blood pressure and heart rate and were measured in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest for the participants. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: systolic blood pressure (SBP): value \>150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>=30 mmHg and value \<90 and decrease from baseline ≥30. Diastolic BP (mm Hg) Value \>100 and increase from baseline \>= 20 and Value \<50 and decrease from baseline \>=20. Heart Rate (beats per minute \[BPM\]): Value \<40 or \>120. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Baseline (last non-missing value observed before start of treatment on Day 1), EOT (Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14), TOC (Day 28) | Physical examination included assessment of the following: abdomen, cardiovascular, ears, eyes, general appearance, head, lungs, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal, neurological, nose, skin and throat. Number of participants with abnormal physical examination findings for each body system is reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28) | Potential clinically significant criteria included: Hematocrit \<0.7\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Hemoglobin: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline and\>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline;;Erythrocytes: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>60% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes and Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>4.0\*ULN and\>300% Increase from Baseline; Lymphocytes/Leukocytes \<0.25\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline and \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.6\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Platelets\<0.65\*LLN and \>50% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28) | Criteria for potential clinically significant results were: Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase: \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% increase from baseline (IFB); Bilirubin: \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Direct Bilirubin: \>2.0\* ULN and \>150% IFB; Alkaline Phosphatase: 80% decrease from baseline (DFB) and \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Urea Nitrogen:100% DFB and \>3.0\* ULN and \>200% IFB; Creatinine \>2.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Sodium :10% DFB or \>1.1\* ULN and \>10% IFB; Potassium: 20% DFB or \>1.2\* ULN and \>20% IFB; Chloride: 20% DFB or \>1.2\*ULN and \>20% IFB; Bicarbonate: 40% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>40% IFB; Calcium: 30% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>30% IFB; Albumin: 50% DFB or \>1.5\* ULN and \>50% IFB; Glucose: 40% DFB or \>3.0\*ULN and \>200% IFB. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28) | A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest. The following ECG parameters were recorded: heart rate, PR-interval, QRS-duration, QT-interval, QTc-interval, RR interval. Clinical significance of ECG abnormalities was judged by Investigator. |
| Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Day 28 | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC. |
Countries
Argentina, China, Greece, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Romania, Russia, Taiwan, Thailand, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Metallo-beta-Lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria were enrolled. This study was conducted across 9 countries from 25 Dec-2020 to 23-Jan-2023.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 15 participants signed the informed consent form and were randomized in the study. The study was terminated as recruitment of participants with serious infections caused by gram-negative bacteria producing MBL was challenging.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) Participants were administered a loading dose of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM-AVI) by intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes immediately followed by an extended loading dose of ATM-AVI by infusion over 3 hours, and then started a maintenance dose of ATM-AVI by IV infusion over 3 hours on Day 1. Participants with creatinine clearance \>50 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and \>30 to 50 mL per minute were administered maintenance dose once every 6 hours for maximum of 14 days. Participants with creatinine clearance \>15 to 30 mL/min were administered maintenance dose once every 8 hours for maximum of 14 days. Participants with cIAI also received metronidazole (MTZ) 500 milligram (mg) every 8 hours by IV infusion over 60 minutes. | 12 |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) Participants who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of cIAI, NP, HAP, VAP, cUTI or BSI received Best Available Therapy (BAT) based upon site practice and local epidemiology for a maximum of 14 days. Participants with cIAI in the BAT arm received metronidazole if BAT did not provide adequate anaerobic coverage. | 3 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14 | 65.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66 | 58.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.85 |
| Age, Customized 65-74 years | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Age, Customized <65 years | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age, Customized 75-84 years | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 3 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 12 | 1 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 12 | 1 / 2 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 12 | 2 / 2 |
Outcome results
Primary
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Day 28
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Physical examination included assessment of the following: abdomen, cardiovascular, ears, eyes, general appearance, head, lungs, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal, neurological, nose, skin and throat. Number of participants with abnormal physical examination findings for each body system is reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline (last non-missing value observed before start of treatment on Day 1), EOT (Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14), TOC (Day 28)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received. Here, 'Number Analyzed'= participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen - Baseline | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen - End of Treatment | 4 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen -Test of cure | 2 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular - Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular - End of Treatment | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular -Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears- Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears - End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes - Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes - End of Treatment | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes -Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance- Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance - End of Treatment | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- End of Treatment | 2 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs- Baseline | 4 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs-End of Treatment | 2 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs-Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-Baseline | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-End of Treatment | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-Baseline | 8 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-End of Treatment | 5 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-Test of cure | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-End of Treatment | 3 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-End of Treatment | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen - Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen - End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Abdomen -Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular - Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular - End of Treatment | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Cardiovascular -Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears- Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears - End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lymph Nodes-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Ears-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes - Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes - End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Eyes -Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-End of Treatment | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance- Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Nose-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance - End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Musculoskeletal-Test of cure | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | General Appearance-Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Skin-Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Head- Test of cure | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Neurological-End of Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Lungs- Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Throat-Baseline | 1 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments
Criteria for potential clinically significant results were: Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase: \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% increase from baseline (IFB); Bilirubin: \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Direct Bilirubin: \>2.0\* ULN and \>150% IFB; Alkaline Phosphatase: 80% decrease from baseline (DFB) and \>3.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Urea Nitrogen:100% DFB and \>3.0\* ULN and \>200% IFB; Creatinine \>2.0\* ULN and \>100% IFB; Sodium :10% DFB or \>1.1\* ULN and \>10% IFB; Potassium: 20% DFB or \>1.2\* ULN and \>20% IFB; Chloride: 20% DFB or \>1.2\*ULN and \>20% IFB; Bicarbonate: 40% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>40% IFB; Calcium: 30% DFB or \>1.3\* ULN and \>30% IFB; Albumin: 50% DFB or \>1.5\* ULN and \>50% IFB; Glucose: 40% DFB or \>3.0\*ULN and \>200% IFB.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed'= participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Calcium:>1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alanine Aminotransferase: >3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bilirubin: >1.5* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Direct Bilirubin: >2.0* ULN and >150% Increase from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alkaline Phosphatase:80% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alkaline Phosphatase:>3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Urea Nitrogen:100% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Urea Nitrogen:>3.0* ULN and >200% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Creatinine:>2.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Sodium:10% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Sodium:>1.1* ULN and >10% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Potassium:20% Decrease from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Potassium:>1.2* ULN and >20% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Chloride:20% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Chloride:>1.2*ULN and >20% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bicarbonate:40% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bicarbonate:>1.3* ULN and >40% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Aspartate Aminotransferase: >3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Albumin:50% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Albumin:>1.5* ULN and >50% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Glucose:40% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Glucose:>3.0*ULN and >200% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Calcium:30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Potassium:20% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Aspartate Aminotransferase: >3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Albumin:>1.5* ULN and >50% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alanine Aminotransferase: >3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Potassium:>1.2* ULN and >20% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bilirubin: >1.5* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Calcium:>1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Direct Bilirubin: >2.0* ULN and >150% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Chloride:20% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alkaline Phosphatase:80% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Glucose:>3.0*ULN and >200% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Alkaline Phosphatase:>3.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Chloride:>1.2*ULN and >20% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Urea Nitrogen:100% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Albumin:50% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Urea Nitrogen:>3.0* ULN and >200% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bicarbonate:40% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Creatinine:>2.0* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Glucose:40% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Sodium:10% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Bicarbonate:>1.3* ULN and >40% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Sodium:>1.1* ULN and >10% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments | Calcium:30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest. The following ECG parameters were recorded: heart rate, PR-interval, QRS-duration, QT-interval, QTc-interval, RR interval. Clinical significance of ECG abnormalities was judged by Investigator.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments
Potential clinically significant criteria included: Hematocrit \<0.7\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Hemoglobin: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline and\>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline;;Erythrocytes: \<0.7\*LLN and \>30% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.3\*ULN and \>30% Increase from Baseline; Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>60% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes and Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>4.0\*ULN and\>300% Increase from Baseline; Lymphocytes/Leukocytes \<0.25\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline and \>1.5\* ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<0.65\*LLN and \>75% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.6\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline; Platelets\<0.65\*LLN and \>50% Decrease from Baseline or \>1.5\*ULN and \>100% Increase from Baseline.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed'= participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hematocrit: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Erythrocytes: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <0.25* LLN and >75% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hemoglobin: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Lymphocytes/ Leukocytes: >1.5*ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Leukocytes: <0.65* LLN and >60% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Monocytes/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hemoglobin: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <0.65*LLN and >75% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Leukocytes:>1.5* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >1.6*ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Erythrocytes: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Platelets: <0.65*LLN and >50% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Basophils/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Platelets: >1.5 *ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hematocrit: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Platelets: >1.5 *ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hematocrit: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hematocrit: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hemoglobin: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Hemoglobin: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Erythrocytes: <0.7* LLN and >30% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Erythrocytes: >1.3* ULN and >30% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Leukocytes: <0.65* LLN and >60% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Leukocytes:>1.5* ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Basophils/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <0.25* LLN and >75% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Lymphocytes/ Leukocytes: >1.5*ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Monocytes/Leukocytes: >4.0* ULN and >300% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <0.65*LLN and >75% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >1.6*ULN and >100% Increase from Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments | Platelets: <0.65*LLN and >50% Decrease from Baseline | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; considered an important medical event. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study medication start date and time.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until late follow-up visit (Up to Day 45)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | TEAEs | 11 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | SAEs | 2 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital signs included blood pressure and heart rate and were measured in a supine position after at least 10 minutes of rest for the participants. Criteria for vital sign abnormalities included: systolic blood pressure (SBP): value \>150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and increase from baseline \>=30 mmHg and value \<90 and decrease from baseline ≥30. Diastolic BP (mm Hg) Value \>100 and increase from baseline \>= 20 and Value \<50 and decrease from baseline \>=20. Heart Rate (beats per minute \[BPM\]): Value \<40 or \>120.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | SBP: Value <90 and decrease from baseline >=30 | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | DBP: Value <50 and decrease from baseline >=20 | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | DBP: Value >100 and increase from baseline >=20 | 0 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | Heart Rate (BPM): <40 or >120 | 6 Participants |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | SBP: Value >150 and increase from baseline >=30 | 3 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | Heart Rate (BPM): <40 or >120 | 2 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | SBP: Value >150 and increase from baseline >=30 | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | SBP: Value <90 and decrease from baseline >=30 | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | DBP: Value >100 and increase from baseline >=20 | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities | DBP: Value <50 and decrease from baseline >=20 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization up to Day 28
Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants regardless of receipt of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set | 8.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause on or before 28 days after randomization were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization up to Day 28
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set | 8.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: ME analysis set: Participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours of study therapy or \<48 hours before discontinuation due to an adverse event; no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between first dose of study therapy and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed) and no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | 66.67 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | 0.00 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment. Participants with a per participant response of Indeterminate were excluded from this analysis. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 81.82 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Population: ME analysis set: Participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours of study therapy or \<48 hours before discontinuation due to an adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between first dose of study therapy and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed) and no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | 0.00 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment. Participants with a per participant response of indeterminate were excluded from this analysis. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 60.00 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 58.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: ME analysis set: Participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours of study therapy or \<48 hours before discontinuation due to an adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between first dose of study therapy and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed) and no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: Day 28
Population: ME analysis set: Participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours of study therapy or \<48 hours before discontinuation due to an adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between first dose of study therapy and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed) and no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: ME analysis set. All pathogens reported under 'Overall Number of Pathogens Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. n= pathogens evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 80.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 100.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterococcus faecium | 100.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
Secondary
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment. All pathogens reported under 'Overall Number of Pathogens Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed (n)'= pathogens evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 75.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 50.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 66.7 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterococcus faecium | 100.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
Secondary
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). ME analysis set comprised of participants from micro-ITT who received at least 48 hours or \<48 hours of study therapy before discontinuation due to AE, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline MBL positive pathogens between 1st dose and TOC (excluding those with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing (except when locally confirmed); no indeterminate clinical outcomes at TOC.
Time frame: Day 28
Population: ME analysis set. All pathogens reported under 'Overall Number of Pathogens Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. n= pathogens evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 60.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 50.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterococcus faecium | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
Secondary
Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants).
Time frame: Day 28
Population: Micro-ITT analysis set was a subset of the ITT analysis set and included all participants who had at least 1 MBL-positive Gram-negative baseline pathogen from an adequate specimen at the start of study treatment. All pathogens reported under 'Overall Number of Pathogens Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. n= pathogens evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 50.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 33.3 Percentage of pathogens |
| Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM- AVI) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterococcus faecium | 0.0 Percentage of pathogens |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set | Enterobacterales | 0.00 Percentage of pathogens |