Skip to content

A 6-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Quillichew ERCT in 4-5 Year Old Children With ADHD.

A Phase 4, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Quillichew (Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (Hcl)) Extended Release Chewable Tablets (Erct) In 4-5 Year Old Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Adhd)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03580005
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-07-09
Start date
2018-10-31
Completion date
2021-10-12
Last updated
2018-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Brief summary

A 6-week double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Quillichew extended release chewable tablets in 4-5 year old children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Interventions

methylphenidate HCl ERCT

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo to Match Quillichew ERCT

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female child 4-5 years of age at baseline. 2. Signed and dated informed consent document. 3. Meets DSM-V criteria for ADHD based on the K-SADS-PL. 4. ADHD RS-IV Preschool Home Version score at Screening and Baseline \>/= 90th percentile for gender and age in \>/=1 of the following: hyperactive-impulsive subscale, inattentive subscale, or total score. 5. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4 (PPVT4)Standard Score \>/=70. 6. Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) score \</= 55.

Exclusion criteria

1. Treated with atomoxetine within 30 days prior to the Baseline. 2. Received any investigational products or devices within 30 days prior to the Baseline visit. 3. History of stimulant nonresponse, intolerability or hypersensitivity to any dose of Quillichew ERCT or other stimulant. 4. An intelligence quotient (IQ) \<70. 5. History of acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or cardiac or laboratory abnormality. 6. Less than 5th percentile for height or weight at Screening. 7. History of recent clinically significant self-harming behaviors.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety-incidence of treatment emergent adverse events6 monthsincidence of treatment emergent adverse events
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Rating Scale - IV (ADHD RS-IV) Preschool-Home Version6 weeksChange from Baseline to end of double-blind treatment in the total score of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Rating Scale - IV (ADHD RS-IV) Preschool-Home Version

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intellectual Performance of Children Using Child Behavior Checklist 4-18 Years (CBCL 4-18)Weeks 1-6CBCL was standardized for children ages 4 to 18 years and measured child internalizing and externalizing behaviors and total problems. The 4-18 years' checklist contains 140 questions and responses were recorded on a Likert scale: 0 = Not True, 1 = Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2 = Very True or Often True. The range of possible values was 0-280 (0=good to 280=worst).
incidence of adverse events6 weeksincidence of adverse events
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scoreWeeks 1-6CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected
Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)Week 6CGAS: clinician-rated global assessment item for children based on symptoms and social functioning in home, school, and community settings. Scores on this single item range from 1 (most impaired) to 100 (healthiest); higher levels indicate greater health, with descriptive anchors for every 10-point interval. Scores above 70 on this scale are considered within the normal range; lower score indicates need for increased supervision.
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Scoreweeks 1-6CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?. Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026