Skip to content

Evaluation of Profile Changes and Torque Control in Dental Bimaxillary Proclination Cases Using Lingual Lever Arm Mechanics vs Conventional Lingual Orthodontic Mechanics A Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of Profile Changes and Torque Control in Dental Bimaxillary Proclination Cases Using Lingual Lever Arm Mechanics vs Conventional Lingual Orthodontic Mechanics A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03579745
Enrollment
24
Registered
2018-07-09
Start date
2018-10-31
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2018-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bimaxillary Proclination

Keywords

lingual orthodontics, Lever arm, En masse retraction

Brief summary

This study evaluates the profile changes and torque control using lingual lever arm vs conventional lingual mechanics. Half of the patients will receive lever arms and the other half will receive conventional lingual orthodontics.

Detailed description

Conventional lingual orthodontic biomechanics leads to torque loss during en masse retraction of the anterior segment in the bimaxillary proclination cases treated by first premolar extraction. Torque loss affects the final outcome of the treatment negatively. Adding a lever arm to the lingual wire will transmit the point of force application at or apical to the center of rotation which will reduce or eliminate toqrue loss during anterior segment retraction.

Interventions

A coil spring will be attached from the lever arm to the first molar tube

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female adult patients with age range 18-30 yrs old. * Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar proclination. * Full permanent dentition. * Good oral hygiene. * Maximum anchorage is required. * Healthy bone around the first molars is needed.

Exclusion criteria

.Systemic disease. * Severe crowding. * Extracted or missing upper permanent tooth/teeth (except for third molars). * Signs, symptoms or previous history of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). * Previous orthodontic treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasolabial angle12 monthsSoft tissue lateral cephalometric radiograph measurement
Profile convexity reduction12 monthsN'-sn -Pog' soft tissue angle

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Torque control12 monthsU1 - Palatal plane angle

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed Kandil Al Asfar, Masters
Kandilahmed04@gmail.com01008087762
Backup ContactSherif Kordy, PhD
sherif-kordi@hotmail.com01224015821

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026